Comments by "Mike W" (@mikew764) on "Hunter Biden's IRS Lawsuit Is 'Not The Smartest Move In The World': Mark Penn" video.

@sharp3552 There was no whistleblower authorization. And that does not not mean you get to release a private citizens tax information
2
You dont know the difference between a charge and an indictment?
1
@sabaha4637 You said the same about HRC
1
@dustinbarlow1623 most likely Hunter will get probation and diversion, which is standard for the crime he’s been charged with.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 nobody goes to jail for a first time offense for what he’s been charged with. Lol
1
@dustinbarlow1623 if there was a deeper underlying crime then it would be in the indictment lol
1
@dustinbarlow1623 not even close to what judge Noriega said. Lol
1
@dustinbarlow1623 just go look up the sentencing guidelines for his charge. Doesn’t say anything about going to jail for first time offense.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 he didn’t throw a gun away in the trash. That was someone else. And if they wanted to use that they have to include it in the indictment!
1
@dustinbarlow1623 You clearly have no idea how any of this works
1
@dustinbarlow1623 it doesn’t raise the sentencing standard. That’s my point. Are you not listening?
1
@dustinbarlow1623 NO. you cannot be charged with murder or homicide if someone steals your gun and uses it to kill someone😂
1
@dustinbarlow1623 The judge hasn’t brought up prison. You’ve demonstrated multiple times that you have no idea what the judge has actually said.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 nobody gets the maximum sentence, or even a half for a first time nonviolent offense.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 you’re basically just admitting that you do not understand how the sentencing guidelines works.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 it’s not just made up on the fly lol
1
@dustinbarlow1623 she gave her personal opinion. Not the actual standard.😂
1
@dustinbarlow1623 do you really not understand the difference?
1
@dustinbarlow1623 are you trying to argue that this one judges opinion is somehow the gate keeper of what standard and what’s not?
1
@dustinbarlow1623 nothing in RCW 9.41.360 says you would be charged with murder if somebody else killed somebody after stealing your firearm. Lol
1
@dustinbarlow1623 you will be charged with community endangerment. A completely different thing.😂
1
@dustinbarlow1623 I never said you wouldn’t be found criminally liable. I said you wouldn’t be charged for murder. You should learn to read more carefully
1
@dustinbarlow1623 she didn’t say anything about precedent. She talked about her opinion in her own court. Two different things.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 just because she doesn’t personally see it often does not mean it’s not standard
1
@dustinbarlow1623 she made it personal about herself. That’s what we call an opinion.😂
1
@dustinbarlow1623 "the court may make factual and legal determinations that differ from these stipulations " But they haven't. I dont think you know what This means
1
@dustinbarlow1623 "Nowhere in the transcripts does it say Biden gets a free ride because he is a first time offender" You just proved that you dont understand that the sentencing guidelines are.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 Judges cant bring charges or just make up whatever sentence they want.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 What does prosecutors discretion have anything to do with this? Weiss is the prosecutor. He has yet to bring any other charges. Until he does, you point is moot.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 IF Weiss brings more charges THEN the sentencing guideline math will change. No one is saying otherwise
1
@dustinbarlow1623 But for his CURRENT charges, he nor anyone else would see jail for a first time,nonviolent offence
1
@dustinbarlow1623 Again, the judge does not get to make up whatever sentence she wants. Look it up.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 Thats not what the guidelines say.
1
@dustinbarlow1623 You're just making up you're own math. Thats not how it works lol
1
@CommonSense823 Still against the law.
1