Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW165) on "Alan Dershowitz: 'Never Seen' Anybody Attempt What Jack Smith Is Trying To Do" video.

  1.  @dhillman7522  He told jan6 ers to "fight and take back their country before its destroyed" 20 times
    3
  2.  @sundial-el3nt  prosecutors are allowed to be as partisan as they want.
    2
  3. False
    2
  4.  @freakyninja3545  so you admit you have no proof. got it
    2
  5.  @dhillman7522  "This all happened after the vote does not apply." False. Still applies
    2
  6.  @dhillman7522  HRC did not obstruct or attempt to obstruct official processings
    2
  7.  @dhillman7522  You clearly have no idea how the law works
    2
  8.  @freakyninja3545  False
    2
  9. There is no evidence that biden committed any crimes in the first place
    2
  10.  @aarongoff1111  Just proving my point that you cant cope
    1
  11.  @aarongoff1111  Why are you so obsessed with the election?
    1
  12.  @aarongoff1111  All of his many crimes have been directly cited in the indictments. You just haven't read them
    1
  13. False
    1
  14.  @sundial-el3nt  Thats not what I said.
    1
  15. They did not make a law respecting an establishment of religion in this country
    1
  16. The 1A deals with laws IN OUR country lol
    1
  17.  @hjm5885  You're clearly confused
    1
  18.  @hjm5885  Learn how to cope
    1
  19.  @alpha-omega2362  Well if they dont take it up it spells doom for trump
    1
  20.  @freakyninja3545  Prove it
    1
  21.  @freakyninja3545  Just wanted to follow me about like triggered puppy I see
    1
  22.  @freakyninja3545  I know you already admitted you have no proof. Thats why I said it.
    1
  23.  @freakyninja3545  Why are you crying after you already admitted there is no evidence ?
    1
  24. False
    1
  25.  @buddysumner4022  What do you mean why? Because trump filed an appeal that he has immunity
    1
  26.  @buddysumner4022  This was always going to go to SCOTUS. Hes just getting it over with
    1
  27.  @buddysumner4022  A federal court decision would apply to them both same as SCOTUS would. So what difference does it make?
    1
  28.  @buddysumner4022  Hes doing this to stop trump from continuing to delay the case. Not that hard to understand
    1
  29.  @buddysumner4022  " u will see he got a federal judge to rule trump can’t be prosecuted, but the Supreme Court has the final say over everything" I know all this. Whats your point??
    1
  30.  @buddysumner4022  Why is it that everyone knows why except for you?
    1
  31.  @buddysumner4022  Funny how you cant say what the actual problem is
    1
  32.  @freakyninja3545  Following me around, proving my point that you're obsessed with me
    1
  33.  @freakyninja3545  I have not spoken about my political views
    1
  34.  @freakyninja3545  Please continue to prove how obsessed you are with me
    1
  35.  @freakyninja3545  Quote a political view i've made then. Bet you cant
    1
  36.  @freakyninja3545  Look at what? Specifically
    1
  37.  @freakyninja3545  Explain how they are related
    1
  38.  @freakyninja3545  aka. you have nothing. Got it
    1
  39.  @freakyninja3545  Whatever you need to tell yourself to feel better.
    1
  40. False
    1
  41. Has been found guilty of civil fraud and SA
    1
  42.  @freakyninja3545  Learn how to cope
    1
  43. ​ @freakyninja3545  Just embarrassing yourself
    1
  44.  @freakyninja3545  Project more
    1
  45.  @freakyninja3545  Thanks for proving my point
    1
  46.  @freakyninja3545  I said you proved it for me. Try reading more carefully
    1
  47.  @freakyninja3545  You're clearly confused
    1
  48.  @freakyninja3545  You dont even know what you're talking about
    1
  49.  @freakyninja3545  Can you even read english?
    1
  50.  @freakyninja3545  Google says he was found guilty of fraud and SA
    1