General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Mike W
Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "Mike W" (@MikeW165) on "Trump Colorado Case: What Is The 14th Amendment And How Has It Historically Been Used?" video.

@oldschoolzone5711 No it doesn't
3
@Aaron-fo1sy "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, OR HOLD ANY OFFICE, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state" Why do you keep trying to ignoring the "any office" part?
3
@Aaron-fo1sy The Constitution does not say "committed insurrection" It says "engaged in". Two different things.
3
@Aaron-fo1sy You're entire argument is that the 14th does not apply to him and the case should be be brought. Who are you kidding?
3
@Aaron-fo1sy You have not given any legitimate legal reasoning.
3
@4x4nerd80 You just admitted you have not read the Constitution. hahaha
3
@MG_Franklin_Kirby If you were familiar with the Constitution you would know this is not an abuse. His actions are those of engaging in insurrection. Try and keep up
3
@4x4nerd80 Congress gave the courts the power to enforce it
3
@growthmindset2039 Hes kicked off because his actions disqualify him under the constitution
3
False
2
@RobHoffman83 It was ruled an insurrection by multiple courts
2
@samdelossantos2864 Its a statue issue. Does not need federal power
2
@Aaron-fo1sy Then why do we even have courts? You're not making any sense
2
@oldschoolzone5711 How would democrat's be removed? What insurrection did they engage in?
2
@oldschoolzone5711 You clearly dont understand whats going on here or how this works.
2
@Aaron-fo1sy It includes "ANY OFFICE". including the office of the president
2
@oldschoolzone5711 How would section 3 of the 14th apply to any democrat?
2
@Aaron-fo1sy Your response is wrong.
2
@Aaron-fo1sy I already proved this to be wrong
2
@Aaron-fo1sy Do you not understand what the word "any office" means?
2
@Aaron-fo1sy So you're saying that the term "any office" would somehow not include the office of the president? What sense does that make?
2
@Aaron-fo1sy You keep trying to twist things. Why that?
2
@oldschoolzone5711 He does not been to be tried or convicted. Thats the entire point of these cases
2
@oldschoolzone5711 How would democrats be removed? Please explain
2
@oldschoolzone5711 How its the ruling unconditional?
2
@oldschoolzone5711 Nothing about is unconstitutional. you just dont know how the Constitution works
2
@Aaron-fo1sy You're talking like you know better then the judges.
2
@oldschoolzone5711 FBI did not say that
2
@oldschoolzone5711 Why are you lying and who do you're think you're fooling??
2
@Aaron-fo1sy None of those judges were in these trials so I guess they dont matter either
2
@Aaron-fo1sy My opinion is at the law and constitutional process was followed and the decisions is legitimate. I never said a higher court couldn't overrule it. Thats how the process works and I have no problem with it
2
@Aaron-fo1sy YOU dont think this case should have been allowed to be brought in the first place. Thats just wrong
2
False
2
@jeffkardosjr.3825 How do you prove something? With evidence
2
@arthurmorgan42069 You have not even read section 3 so how would you know?
2
@4x4nerd80 "where does it say in the constitution that you need an allegation of insurrection to be removed from the ballot," It says that in section 3 of the 14th.
2
@curtismatsune3147 Learn how to cope
2
@M.J.212 Yes, Which means that it applies to trump
2
@4x4nerd80 The court determined he did. And you clearly cant handle it
2
@happymedium. He does not need to be arrested or charged with anything
2
@happymedium. Write ins would not be counted if hes been disqualified. Nice try though
2
@happymedium. Not all trials have jurys. And he did have a defence. He just lost
2
@4x4nerd80 It was determined with evidence. Just like everything else
2
@4x4nerd80 Its a civil case so the burden of proof would be "a preponderance of the evidence"
2
@happymedium. This is a civil trial. not a criminal one. Please educate yourself
2
@dwreal1717 Article 1, Section 4 of the Constitution explains that the States have the primary authority over election administration
2
The case and a preponderance of the evidence is a lot bigger then one speech
1
@Aaron-fo1sy The office of the president is, in fact and office of the United States. Two separate courts recently affirmed that
1
@Aaron-fo1sy The judges who just ruled are the ones who do it for a living and they say you are wrong
1
@grben9959 False
1
@grben9959 The disagrees with you
1
@bigtenfourrubberducky You can deny it all you want. not going to change the facts
1
@bigtenfourrubberducky You're literally holding water for someone who tried to overturn the election and take power and you wanna talk about dictatorship? hahahaha
1
@xx_HI_xx7 False
1
@happymedium. How was this done unconstitutionally? Where does it say he needs to be charged or convicted?
1
@xx_HI_xx7 The entire thing.
1
@happymedium. Im not talking about the committee. Im talking about state and federal courts
1
@growthmindset2039 Biden lives rent free in your head
1
@growthmindset2039 Stop acting like you have done "research" hanging out in your echo chamber is not "doing research"
1
@curtismatsune3147 Still crying about it I see
1
@growthmindset2039 This has nothing to do with politics
1
@happymedium. You clearly dont understand anything about states rights
1
@happymedium. The election clearly gives states the power to run ALL elections. Including national ones. If you had bothered to read it you might know that
1
@4x4nerd80 I don't think you understand whats going on there. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GUILT
1
@4x4nerd80 EVerytime you post you demonstrate you have no idea how the law works
1
@4x4nerd80 Where in the 14th section 3 does it say anything about being charged or found guilty of anything?
1
@4x4nerd80 Have you even read the Constitution?
1
@dwreal1717 Congress made legislation that moves it to the states.
1
@dwreal1717 Congress is a political body. Not a legal one
1
@dwreal1717 Congressional Acquittal has literally no bearing on the law or legal charges
1
@dwreal1717 You showed me text that proves MY point. You cant even understand what you're saying
1
@happymedium. You have not read the constitution so how would you know
1
@dwreal1717 Thats not what the constitution says. Not even close
1
@dwreal1717 And since you seem to have forgotten, he's not the president.
1
@dwreal1717 You proved you have not read the Constitution hahahaha
1
@jonathannelson103 so you’re arguing over semantics? The point is he was found liable by the court.
1