Youtube comments of 八雲紫 (@WomanSlayer69420).
-
87000
-
2400
-
2300
-
1200
-
539
-
446
-
210
-
123
-
116
-
91
-
31
-
23
-
21
-
17
-
13
-
13
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
7
-
6
-
@hugehappygrin since when did I talk about the big bang?
I never said I believed in it... anyways... here we fucking go again.
Many people theorize that the universe came from a single point, because of the universe's continual expansion, so thinking that the world came from a singularity is definitely more logical than thinking an entity that literally could do anything poofed the world into existence.
About evolution: do not use de-evolved, because remember. Evolution does not mean changing to look better, stronger, or "looking like it's more viable" if you survive and reproduce, your genes will live on. The other ape species still exist, because they were still viable enough in the current world. Tool use isn't needed to survive. High intelligence isn't needed to survive. All that matters is that you don't die before you have children.
Just because the dinosaurs died out and their relatives (crocodilians) didn't, does not make that "de-evolving"
(this is to ignore the fact that people have already seen evolution with bacteria/viruses going on, but I know you would just say "microevolution isn't equal to macroevolution" which, although illogical... welp. I don't want to waste my time discussing this. I have a life.)
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@henokhboanerges3252 The same can be said about anything, but to me, unless if there is concrete proof of God's existence that doesn't rely on pointing out contradictory scripture, God's existence would be fictional, and every time something bad happens and people begin blaming god, it's always the same two excuses. 1. "Satan did it, not God's fault" well really, not so omnipotent anymore since you allowed ONE OF YOUR ROUGE EX-FOLLOWERS to take more control over the world, huh? and 2. "He's testing your faith" well, he doesn't seem like somebody I could trust, if he continuously tries to "test my faith" after causing a really fucked up incident. Should I go out scamming somebody of $50k by saying that I'll give them double the money back if they wait a year, and after they wait a year, I don't give the money and say "I'm testing your faith lulz" to cover up the fact that it's no different from a scam?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jasonkandahq1003 The ozone layer was created from cyanobacteria billions of years ago, and it didn't "protect" us from UV light, it only filtered out some of it. That means you stay out there for long enough you will still get burned. The mere fact that disease existed before human advancement proves that humans are not the cause of disease. Humans are living organisms so a large population (which we have right now) is more prone to a spreadable disease than a small population. It's not rocket science. The 3rd law was never violated. It states that entropy may decrease when there is almost no energy in a system, which makes sense. Imagine the energy as particles that move randomly. A small amount of particles has a much greater chance of randomly moving together, but a large amount has a much lower chance of it. It doesn't create or destroy energy. I don't know why you accuse me of violating this and that when you don't even take 5 minutes to think for yourself.
In a nutshell, these are my points. Reply to these first and then I'll talk to you about your "god."
1. Energy is finite, but since it's not able to be created or destroyed, it was probably always there.
2. Evolution is a proven fact and macroevolution is the logical step as the result of many generations of microevolution and a lot of time.
3. There is no intelligent design and the causality of human life is possible and very probable by natural causes. There are too many flaws of the system and the organisms, so it does not seem like something that is scripted. Chances are that there is no miracle, nor supernatural being that directed this, and even if there is a supernatural being that is the reason for the universe's creation, all the evidence we have right now are against the existence of the deities of most, if not all religions, with the only ones that aren't contradicting only being so because their religion only used vague statements based on philosophical truths that don't change, rather than tales of miracles and human interaction that could easily be traceable and proven wrong.
1
-
1
-
@jasonkandahq1003 "God gave me this, God gave me that, God gave me my human rights, etc." Except if you were to stop fighting for it, you'd lose your rights in an instant. Just shows how fragile everything is. What would the "purpose" for everything be? To serve an invisible supernatural entity? That's way more illogical than just saying that nothing exists for a purpose. After all, purpose is also a human concept. The current conditions of the world are caused in part due to advancement, but without that advancement, instead of complaining about having to stay home and wear masks (which you don't even have to, covid death rates are low as fuck even without the vaccine, like 1% right now and basically nobody died of covid after getting the shots.) chances are you'd be in extreme pain and suffering from fucken Guinea Worm, some other unheard parasitic diseases or dying of a bacterial infection with the only "medical" treatments doing more harm than good. We are at a point where technological advancements are creating a better future every day, despite all the media bullshit and fearmongering.
"Survival of the fittest" means that the organisms that are capable of surviving in their environment will survive, while the ones that can't, die off. It's as simple as that. It applies to evolution but really it applies to everything.
"Modern humans" or homo-sapiens have been estimated to split off around 200,000 years ago, and the last ice age lasted from around 90k years ago to about 25k years ago. That's a third of our history, and in that period we had a point where our species almost died out completely.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@aidancanionero7785 it depends on what you mean by "on purpose"
Humans are made of meat, and a desperate shark may very well attack a human to survive. That being said, humans are pretty low on the "preferred food-o-meter" for sharks because of their high ratio of bone to flesh, and most attacks happen because the shark thinks the human was something it does like to eat, like a sea lion. That being said, I do despise shark finning, but I despise it mainly for the reason that it is very unsustainable and is causing havoc in oceanic ecosystems, but spare the cruelty argument. Animals don't care about their prey's pain when they're hunting, and neither should you care about how "cruel" your food is. If you mark an animal as food, then kill it and eat it. Don't take "humane" killing into concern, because you've already decided to give an organism the L in life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1