Comments by "Bo McGillacutty" (@Mrbfgray) on "Bloomberg Technology" channel.

  1. Elon is not seeking more pay, he's seeking more control, do your darn homework Doomberg.
    26
  2.  @jasonbaylor9865  You are dupe. NO ONE is required to work and you can shut in for the rest of your damn life, don't impose your ignorant standards on the rest of us.
    21
  3. She has NO IDEA about Elon's management of employees. Tesla is doing fantastic and Twitter is dramatically improved with a fraction of the overhead in only one month.
    19
  4. Clickbait. Nothing here backs the title.
    10
  5. Correct about everyone except Tesla. 60 minutes 2000: "'Amazon is worth 20% more than Sears!!!'" Stated with humorous astonishment.
    7
  6. Right, MOST will fail. It's suddenly far easier for them to raise capital but they are in a much tougher landscape today and a decade behind Tesla.
    7
  7. This is a rare, exciting entertaining situation kids, likely once in a life time. Stay tuned and I'll stay long for now. :D
    6
  8. Ever see the 60 minutes clip of host laughing at AMZN worth 20% more than Sears Back in 2000 or 2001. Most of the EV bets will not pay off however and do seem to be 'faith' not DD. As always--be very careful.
    5
  9.  @tongtran007  EPIIC, to use a 20th century boomer term. :D Amazon is worth infinitely more that Sears today and you'd be rich just investing a used car's value of shares in 2001 and forgetting about it. (but it wasn't easy with AMZN either, never is)
    5
  10. Maybe but not for your reasons, rescinding Elon's comp package is a stain on Delaware not Tesla and the market agrees. If anything--shrugging off BS "bad news" is good news for the stock, nothing new, we've been dealing with extreme bias against Tesla/Elon for over a decade.
    4
  11. Not a chance Elon will approve such an idiotic ad, a Tesla advert will be entertaining and informative above all else.
    4
  12. This clip is from an hour long interview some 6 months ago when there weren't many 3's around.
    3
  13. Sure...THAT's why they lost, hahahaha.
    3
  14.  @seans2876  What was she LYING about? Sounds like you got nothing but childish emotional reactions.
    3
  15.  @seans2876  What numbers she articulated are you talking about? Why don't you look and see where she was in the past, it's the reason she's treated with extra respect by the panel here.
    3
  16. Nope. They just don't get it which is a GOOD thing for TSLA going forward. (they are right about most of the others in this space tho)
    3
  17.  @ProjektUnity  Already 'brought me' the liberty to consider earlier retirement. ;-)
    3
  18. They might get lucky and become a minor niche player, 2025 is laughably late, I don't think they'll get far with a car. They'll make it so you have to go to Apple Service to fix a freaking flat tire. ;-)
    3
  19. IDK but this is what we should expect from identity selection criteria...mindless quotas, etc.
    3
  20. Anyone disappointed didn't pay attention. A product unveil would be stupid, first it would Osborn 3 and Y, 2nd it wasn't a product day it was investor day.
    2
  21. Always calmly lays out a compelling case. (but I'm highly biased going on half decade in TSLA)
    2
  22. Really? Must be an emotional fangirl. Pretty straight up reality in the vid.
    2
  23. Lying about what?
    2
  24. @seokhee Han Quit IT! hahaha
    2
  25.  @neeljavia2965  Profit is irrelevant for a high growth company, many good stocks have infinite PE. Growth, future prospects and free cash flow matter. Zoom and many other tech companies have MUCH higher price to revenue. This is why you missed out making a fortune on AMZN. Smart investors want low to zero profits when the growth opportunities are spectacular as they are for TSLA.
    2
  26.  @neeljavia2965  5 yrs it will be 5 to 10X higher most likely. Most have NO IDEA how much potential they have from software and autonomous, and probably energy eventually. Wall St. still doesn't get it with a few exceptions, but they will.
    2
  27.  @neeljavia2965  Another way to look at it--TSLA is approximately the same price to revenue as it was in 2014, granted you could say it was overvalued then too and it went nowhere for 5 yrs but it was also on the verge of insolvency the entire time. That risk has passed and the execution has been phenomenal, once in a generation opportunity. You can keep saying it's "overvalued" as it continues to dramatically rise but at some point you have to simply admit you were WRONG. AMZN broke ground in this area focusing on long term and growth making MANY folks wealthy. TSLA will surpass all the other big caps IMO, within 5 yrs, even as AAPL, GOOGL, AMZN, MSFT continue to grow substantially.
    2
  28.  @ProjektUnity  If you are young and seriously committed to long term investing you might be ahead of me. :D TSLA has at least a decade or two to run like the wind.
    2
  29. Sounds classic Brooklyn accent to me.
    2
  30.  @toddleichtfuss  HA! Well Now You Know. :D
    2
  31. I wouldn't touch the 3. It stops as poorly as a FORD F-150 pickup truck?? Seriously? Some things are deal breakers and that's one of them. Must be 95% FanGirls viewing this, nothing here that wasn't already clear.
    2
  32.  @pattiekim9615  Right. And while I definitely do not want him working for me for free, as he has been for sometime now, he's focused on avoiding some nefarious institutional investor take over down the pike, not at all out of the question or unreasonable. (Blackrock, a gaggle of billionaires or group of big funds, say) I want Elon to be incentivized, highly rewarded and 'locked in' for as long as possible. Not too concerned about the price, just make him content and tie performance to rewards just as before, that's the way he likes it and the rest of us should too. Never was a more just and proper comp pkg in the brief history of capitalism, than his previous pkgs.
    2
  33. However--I'm not thrilled with paying Establishment Media Mafia protection racket like everyone else does.
    2
  34.  @fatisdead7150  That's over the top. I don't know what his sexual tendencies are because it DOESN'T MATTER, it's irrelevant to any considerations I have. Every company and CEO need to be scrutinized but your a damn fool if you-- for example....shun AAPL because the CEO happens to be gay. Elon misses his multi-year time frames no doubt but he has accomplished astounding things even if behind his ridiculously ambitious 'scheduled'. Sounds like you have emotional issues concerning Elon instead of good reasons.
    2
  35. Station 2Station: This is normal, proper skepticism, the same sort of scrutiny any company deserves and get's from the investment community. TSLA gets away with a valuation and stock holder loyalty that very few stocks can immagine. You have no biz owning individual stocks if you don't check your 'thesis', understand the "other side of the trade". (I have a sliver of the TSLA myself, but it's high risk) She was just doing her job and not badly.
    1
  36. Damn your simple.
    1
  37. God also told us how to beat our slaves, murder our children and genocide entire cities.
    1
  38. VW will probably do OK and the Chinese are poised to make a big dent globally.
    1
  39. OMG--paranoid much??
    1
  40. Equally important they asked some good questions.
    1
  41. He was there. Get over it child.
    1
  42.  @kiwim3p587  Have you bothered to tune in to him previously? I doubt it. It's childish to vilify ppl with opinions you don't 100% agree. As a heavy long TSLA I don't need constant reaffirmation of my bull thesis, that's a disaster in the making.
    1
  43.  @Rsmith420  What did he say that was wrong?
    1
  44. The slightest reality check is propaganda to the Cultists. What do you have a problem with here?
    1
  45. The 250 to 500k he's talking about (I believe) is run rate by yr end, very optimistic, way beyond Tesla's expectations but not close to 250/500k production for 2024.
    1
  46. Creative destruction is NOT SAD it's healthy and essential.
    1
  47. Keep parroting that ignorant line and continue to be a penniless loser. :D
    1
  48. BigHeadClan Motor Trend simply praises whoever is spending advertising dollars on them, right? Those aren't remotely objective "reviews" they are extensions of ads.
    1
  49. stinkyfungus Surely that ranks near the bottom of 100 things they did "wrong" at most.
    1
  50. Josh McCullough Seriously?? The point is that they will favor the company that DOES advertise with them. Is that over your head? Same goes for Road & Track, Car & Driver and probably many others.
    1