Comments by "HaJo Os." (@hajoos.8360) on "Kantai Kessen (Japanese Decisive Battle Doctrine) - Method or Madness?" video.

Now Australia is owned by China without one shot.
10
@lordbrain8867 the policy in Russia under the last Tsar had certain aspects, mainly the stupidity of the Tsar. Even in Germany and Habsburg the nobles were degenerated. Drach's japanese strategy of Kentai Kessen was simply wrong. To enforce major battles at sea, you have to enforce the melee at your own conditions. In the conflict against Russia, it was no problem for the IJN, because Russia wanted to expand it's strategic position from Vladivostok to the south (Port Arthur). In the conflict against the US, this was not the case. The US and Britain enforced the war by an oil embargo, which would had brought the Empire of Japan on it's knees. So, to enforce a major battle at sea, the Japanese had to attack the US mainland. At this time the US west coast was difficult to defend and easy to attack, only a few strongholds. The strength of the US and Britain were the economic ressources, not the education of the soldiers and seamen. The political mistakes of the Axxis-powers were that they never intended the total annihilation of the enemy's forces. The Allies intended this target.
3
@Dragon-Believer yes of course, but not in 1941. Someone who can read, gains the advantage.
3
No, Sir, the US defences were poor. The USA is not to defend if an aggressor attacks, even today. Homeland security is a joke. US army is everywhere, but not in the US. Why there is no terror in the United States? Because there is no US embassy.
2
The point is, Britain declared war and lost it, without being conquered.
2
@lordbrain8867 how many Natives or Blacks were Officers in the US navy?
2
@lordbrain8867 This might be a point of view. When Turkey denied to expand Nato-outposts on their territories in the 90s, the US army went to Romania. I saw the big transports coming in at Constanta airport in '98. The first thing the army established was a whorehouse as the Japanese did it, too. We should not rely on formal acts as the abolition. In fact slavery was not abandoned, only officially. For the Vietnamese was any difference with Chinese, French- or US superiority? I like Drach's work so much. It is much better than any german subsidised TV productions. But the political picture of colonialsm made no difference between any colonial masters. The Empress of India was not elected.
2
@allangibson2408 you mean political terror or just shootouts of some cultural cowboys? The US have 30k deadly shots as per year. 10k of those are suicides. This is more than western average.
1
@allangibson2408 a major reason for this is a amendment to the constitution. handfire-weapons are cheap for all....
1
@allangibson2408 There is a Drach-Post for anti-slavery action of the RN. The formal abolition of slavery or serfdom did not changed anything on the planet. What's the difference between the enforcement to work on a cotton-field oder 12hours a day, 6 days a week for a small return? the main difference is, that now everyone can be enslaved....
1
Fine report of Drach! The only other point of view to enforce a sea-born melee in the Pacific, was, to attack the US mainland. And on the US west-coast there are/were not so many maritime hotspots to blockade, beside Panama. The japanese way in reality was not concludent. As the French in the Napoleonic wars, they did not really intended to destroy the enemy's fleet. The US navy could always dodge IJN-operations and focus their own. The oil-wells in Texas must have been the major strategic target of the Japanese. But the Japanese waged war to keep their face, not to win.
1
@DoddyIshamel nice idiot
1
@zaurakdigis this is what Carl von Clausewitz mentioned, who strong is the political purpose? The political intent steers the dimension of war.
1
@Dragon-Believer no Sir, not to conquer Pearl Harbour was the decisive blow against Japanese military interests. The US still could use it as a base to disturb the Japanese supply lines, so the attack remained a fool's mission. At this time, 1941, not to target the major US supply lines destinated to japanese defeat.
1
@jameshannagan7830 Already in 1939 on paper no one could defeat the Sovjetunion. The Red Army had more warplaines and tanks than the rest of the planet including the US. Only the lack of officers, killed in the Great Purge, gave a single percentage-chance to defeat them. Basic factor is Hitler's major political mistake to support Franco in the Spanish Civil War. A stalinistic Spain would have enforced a change of the political stance of the West, mainly Britain. Spanish Biscaya-Ports for Stalin's battleships would have been a major threat. And there is no way for the Germans to keep the US out. On one hand the German progress with nuclear weapons, the US do not mess with nukes, and on the other hand US doctrin to avoid a German-Russian partnership. There are still more reasons, but to return on this channel, the Germans used their afew forces badly. The German admiralty promoted the cowards and sent the brave home.
1
@jameshannagan7830 check the quotes of Winston Churchill, our most famous alcoholic. The Allies never cared about Hitler, they waged war against the Germans to wipe them out according to the M-o-rgenth-au-plan, anyway which government they elected. Hitler was only a good propaganda vehicle for Hollywood and Disney who made it for US-tax-money.
1
@waltergraves3273 Roosevelt and his secretary for marine-affaires knew about the attack on Pearl Harbour, the department which decoded japanese wires was called "magic". But they did not provided Adm. Kimmel on Pearl Harbour with this information. They sacrificed 2.400 GIs to bring the US into war, which Roosevelt intended. But war against Japan was only a curcuit, because Roosevelt's intention was waging war against Germany to wipe the Germans out. Kimmel was used as a scapegoat, and got posthum his honour back in the 90s. Additionally the US betrayed their own declaration of independence to the current day. The kingdom of Hawai was occupied in 1893. The unlucky hawaian people had no chance, but did not organized any military resistance. In 1899 the US made a genozide on the Philippines and killed more than 1 Mio. people (out of 5 Mio.) during the illegal occupation. Who cares for it in the US? The US was and is always the bad guy, simply the major rogue-state on earth betraying everything mentioned in the constitution.
1