Comments by "HaJo Os." (@hajoos.8360) on "Stalingrad class - Guide 061" video.

Sovietunion was an Empire with 123 tribes and nations. So it is very similar to the British Empire, where many nations and tribes got lost.
6
@turbzjjc310 No, Nukes are for everyone on the planet. Better is the distribution of cudgels.
3
@turbzjjc310 Japan attacked (before the Pacific War) only those Chinese areas, where no Entente Powers were active. The Sovjets made an non-aggression-pact withe the Japanese after the Japanese lost the major battles of Khalkhin Gol against the Sovjets in 1939. This pact was needed by Stalin to throw his Siberian armies against the Germans. This was a major strategic failure by the Japanese. And by the way the Brits (with some allies) tortured China (with a minimum of 20 Mio. victims) several times during the 19th century. Now this is the result we have do deal with. Thanks Britain.
2
@ravenkk4816 as ACED mentioned, Stalin was focussed on land-conquest, mainly for Germany. With Germany in his pocket, Britain and the US would have been done for. This is the strategic Stalinism the Brits never understood in their former imperial self-conception. Brits are/were the real fascists, they still believe in their British cultural superiority and live, as here clear to see, in the past.
2
This might be not the truth. With turbines producing more than 200.000 horsepowers, Iowa-class battleships were slow, means the hull is not well designed. And the armor (belt) did not match Scharnhorst-class lvl. So it is no wonder, that the US navy never exposed Iowa-class battle-ships in sea-battles. They served as a AA-platform in WWII.
2
@EvoraGT430 Using Nukes there will be nobody to fear anything again. Cudgels were used (beside Kalashnikovs) in the Gulags, because they produce fear for the living.
1
wkruit1 Yes, this works always on the cost of armament. And US-admirals avoided to send them in battle. For battle they sent slower better armed ships.
1
Hipper-class KGM Lützow was sold to the Sovietunion in 1939. Interesting, isn't it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_cruiser_L%C3%BCtzow_(1939) The Germans donated very careless a lot of airplane know-how to the Sovietunion during the 20s. Maybe the German navy was more careful.
1
@AdamMGTF Yes, of course. Germany paid all Reichsbank-Gold for reparations during the Weimar Republic. So the currency had no real value, which invited foreigners to buy cheap properties over forex-relations. This was not a smart action by the Entente powers. A political escalation between extreme german parties might have been wanted by the Entente, mainly the US, to get the opportunity to eliminate the Germans once and forever.
1
@OtterTreySSArmy For a part of the former German US-population your statement might be true. But Germanic people are federal focussed, a diametrical opposite to Romanic people who lived centralised. For the Germanics nationbuilding is less important, as you can see, how the I. Reich consisted for more than 1.000 years. The US population is in place by the elite of Africa and the scum of Europe. Former US-Europeans were the weak, underdogs, poor, religious minorities, who left Europe, because they had nothing to lose. Since George Washington the US are led by the freemasons, anyway to which party they belong. And the bourgeois freemasons hated their noble drinking buddies and fought successfully for the destruction of the noble rule, which lasted many thousends of years. Already the era before Wilson planned the disturbance between Germans and Russians till today. A close relation between Russia and Germany would have achieved the development of the world leading power. This is the major political US-target in the foreign policy of the US. Any war in Europe against Germany was supported by the US and will be supported by the US.
1
But they had spacecraft-carriers.
1
Romans 13:4 the Germans were too late with Walter Uboats as you can see here https://uboat.net/types/walter_hist.htm
1
@arthurfisher1857 i accept, my sentences are not understandable for everyone. But, you understand surely, dear Arthur, for further lessons in history i will charge you with fees. It becomes cheaper if do you buy books from Mr. Suvorov https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icebreaker_(Suvorov)
1
@crazydiamondrequiem4236 Of course, that's true. BBs made only sense, if air-superiority was existing. There are some exceptions, for example when Scharnhorst made the lucky hit on Glorious from a far distance or in the Battle off Samar, the Japanese (as the Germans) were too reluctant to expose their bigships. Better to sink in battle than to be bombed to the bottom.
1