Comments by "HaJo Os." (@hajoos.8360) on "Why The Dark Ages Were Actually A Time Of Great Achievement | King Arthur's Britain | Timeline" video.

  1. This is a hoax, too. The invasion of Anglo-Saxons was not a brutal one, these guys came fluently in a period of hundred years.
    1
  2.  @Boric78  you mean same as the Neanderthals? We Europeans have 2-4% of their female genes.
    1
  3. Only churchmen and nobles talked Latin. You are too manipulated by the circumstances of the British empire, where those poor indigenes were enforced to learn english by the fascist John Company. Celtic and Germanic tribes talked many different slangs, but they could understand each other. Sean Bean talks Yorkshire, a very anglo-saxon dominated english tongue, what means only a few Normans were present after the invasion of William the conquerer. But you have no difficulties to understand Mr. Bean.
    1
  4.  @andrewwigglesworth3030  Sir, this might be not correct, ´The Brits talked Celtic before the Romans age as some Welsh still do it in our days. The Romans stayed for 400 years in Britain. After the Romans left, the Anglo-Saxon tribes infiltrated Britain in around hundred years. They talked Germanic dialects. After 1066, 200 Norman nobles replaced 3.000 Anglo-Saxon nobles. The Normans talked French. We do not know Richard Lionheart Plantagenet could talk in English at all. From our historical point of view there are some funny coincidences. The word City is Latin, Town Westphalian, it means Zaun (a fence around a settlement). The word Window is Westphalian, too, it means Windooch or Windeye, whereas the Germans say "Fenster", which is Latin and comes from fenestra. So we can dissect each word to analyse it's heritage.
    1
  5.  @andrewwigglesworth3030  What relevance had this what you wrote?
    1
  6. Of course, they left. They were mercinaries, were needed and paid elsewhere.
    1