Comments by "Science Daemon" (@sciencedaemon) on "Linux Code of Conduct Board Blocks File System Changes" video.

  1. ReiserFS was in the kernel long before that murder occurred. Now I suspect it can still be used as a module compiled separately, through DKMS. I don't see how code that is useful should be removed due to the character of the person who wrote it. It's not a living being.
    92
  2. He has gone commie.
    41
  3. communism is painful.
    15
  4. It is the only way commies can take control and ruin freedom.
    3
  5. Code of Communism has no place in any Free Open Speech Software. It is completely anathema to the spirit of FOSS, GPL, etc.
    3
  6. You got it wrong. This is not about those big bucks from corporations at its core. It is about commies, wokies, DEI types, and related that have infiltrated those corporations and the linux foundation to push their ideologies into linux. This is the same thing that happens with organizations and companies that have nothing to do with linux, software. It is a mass plan to control the narrative and censor free speech.
    3
  7. That doesn't make him wrong. Appeal to protocol is still censorship, anti-free speech as Code of Communism is.
    2
  8.  @doltBmB  irrelevant.
    2
  9. you have your bad guys mixed up.
    2
  10. The python dev ban proves my point that this is about commie ideologies taking over, removing freedom. It is not predominantly about money.
    2
  11.  @Rubafix989  then you fail to follow where all these ideas are rooted. Who wants to take away free speech? Who benefits from wokies in the US? You are just looking at the surface.
    1
  12.  @misatokatsuragi9122  If you understood communism you would we that is encompassed.
    1
  13.  @Gigachad-mc5qz  get a dictionary.
    1
  14.  @No-mq5lw  you should be saying free software, not open source. Open source is a business term used to make it sound friendlier to commercial entities. It is pure BS and has nothing to do with the true spirit of free software.
    1
  15.  @jannikheidemann3805  you have no knowledge of how the term came about then. Go do research rookie.
    1
  16.  @acex222  you can't read.
    1
  17.  @acex222  still irrelevant to my point. You can't read.
    1