Comments by "Science Daemon" (@sciencedaemon) on "Banned C++ Contributor Speaks Out" video.

  1. See AIPAC for reference.
    25
  2. You have lost the plot. It is the group that is at fault for taking any kind of complaint seriously. It means they are already compromised, unethical, and give special treatment to certain groups of people over others.
    23
  3. This is the truth that almost all other deny, especially lunduke.
    20
  4. Give you one guess.
    14
  5. Irrelevant if the group kowtows to complaints. It means they are compromised and willingly give special privileges to certain religious groups for a mere word.
    12
  6. Code of Communism. Now find out who created communism.
    12
  7. Who is that person, their background? This fundamentally matters in all questions of this type to get at the truth because as we can see, even lunduke is in denial that it could ever be those of his own belief system.
    10
  8.  @Cybeonix  why did you make your face hit my hand, wah!
    9
  9. All of chemistry is dead now.
    9
  10. Provide name and background of professor. It will speak volumes.
    8
  11. It is a classic and fundamental tactic of communists, not wokies. Wokies are later comers to this game, albeit they aid the commie cause.
    6
  12. lunduke can't because it is impossible in his mind due to massive denial and cognitive dissonance.
    4
  13. They are clearly the ones doing this in one form or another, contrary to lunduke's irrational impossible claim.
    4
  14.  @souljastation5463  you left out all the religions.
    4
  15. If we can get their names, what their beliefs are. Won't turn out as lunduke thinks if I am right. It very well be his own people.
    3
  16. Get lunduke to wake up to it.
    3
  17. Very naive of you. It is very likely it is them or people that support them. Without evidence to the contrary who else is logically going to get offended by a "question"? This is not hard to understand. Why do you poses ideas that are not supported by reality.
    2
  18.  @horusfalcon  how do you know it is "equally" possible, as if it has the same probability? Proper logic dictates that the simplest answer is the most logically correct one. The more convoluted one is more unlikely. Those that directly want to be offended are the most likely to complain, not some person with a devious plan to blames others.
    2
  19.  @brammeijboom-mj9ld  wrong. the ideas are already out at that point and others can look at it no matter what persecution ensues. You seem to think this somehow stops the ideas completely, that no one can read them at all afterwards, that no one else could possibly come to the same conclusions. Instead you pose this convoluted scenario that ignores facts and posits a strawman.
    1
  20.  @PredatoryQQmber  neoliberalism is communism. level up.
    1
  21.  @user-dc9zo7ek5j  that is what the Code of Communism is about. Don't be a CoC-sucker.
    1
  22.  @horusfalcon  How dare he use that word!!!
    1
  23.  @horusfalcon  Oh, you mean you should understand the medium you are communicating in and indicated your meaning when it is not clear from standard writing. You could try that if it makes you fell better about your incompetence, yes. You do realize people cannot read your mind, right?
    1
  24. It is a red pill moment for him to see who is pulling the strings if he wakes up from that equality nonsense he spouted. He might start taking names and checking backgrounds and find the truth. It won't be what he thinks it is.
    1
  25. You mean communist.
    1
  26.  @quintrankid8045  want to join?
    1
  27. Overall, this is a red pill moment bringing attention to some "special" group of people that others always try to divert attention away from (e.g. lunduke himself). Most won't understand, but a few more will wake up each time these incidents keep pointing more and more at them. You have to be very bad at logic (or in denial of reality) if you can't make the connection, find the readily available evidence. Most are like that, not very bright, NPCs that follow the artificial societal narratives rather than think and use ethics.
    1
  28. Wrong. It looks like communism and a religion trying to push itself into everything.
    1
  29. Uh oh, you used the phrase to be frank, as in ann frank. No one can be her except her, you racist. Banned!!!
    1
  30. You should figure out the origins of that term before you start throwing it around. It was created by communists. Now figure out who created communism. If you have any brains you will realize it has no real meaning and is used to control others, a means of coercion, an attack on freedom of thought and speech.
    1
  31. Hello jellyfish. How is life without a spine? Do you always kowtow to your self-selected masters or are they paying you for this crud you post?
    1
  32. I think you are completely wrong about who is behind this. Get information about the people involved before you say it is impossible for those of your religion to think and behave this way. Have you never heard of the ADL, southern poverty law center, etc. that run around targeting people for any imagined slight against that religion, viciously trying to destroy those people's lives? Have you never heard of false flag events by people of your beliefs that have been done so they can play victims and drum up the idea of anti-s? There is documented video evidence of this behavior, criminal cases. It is completely possible it is your own kind. You are living in a bubble. Who is more likely going to think that this "question" is actually being posed? People connected to or not connected to your religion? If they are not connected then they wouldn't care, even notice probably. It is only those of your religion or those that genuflect to it (e.g. communists) that would make a point of it. You are just blowing a lot of hot air as it stands that only acts as a diversion if I am right. Are you going to call out your own kind if it turns out to be them behind it? I think not.
    1
  33. And what do wokies believe in? Special treatment for certain religions. Now where would they get that idea if not from the religion itself?
    1
  34. Now look at society and see who the biggest professional victims are. One big candidate is people that run around calling others anti-s for any idea they do not like.
    1
  35. Raises the question as to who are the "globalists". Who is running all that?
    1
  36. you forgot the J.
    1
  37.  @diadetediotedio6918  nope, the simplest answer is the often correct one. The simplest answer is that the group itself were offended, not some other party operating by proxy.
    1
  38.  @horusfalcon  why are you rambling on then. Seems you want to just be right and can't stand other ideas so you concoct this dribble that tries to make you seem (more) reasonable. I have seen it all before. It is typical nonsense people use to sound like the better party when actually they have extreme ideas they want to ram down others throats because they haven't got the mental fitness to withstand opposition.
    1
  39.  @horusfalcon  where are you running away to, again. :P
    1
  40.  @horusfalcon  then shut up already.
    1
  41.  @Seth9809  You need to get out more then. You are trying to make it sound like only non-blacks get offended on their behalf when it isn't true. Seeing some "hundreds" is what percentage of all offences taken?
    1
  42. You mean communist.
    1