Comments by "Tom Bombadill" (@pefo1674) on "The impact of the SCOTUS immunity ruling on the New York v. Trump case" video.

  1.  @KcityMikeThomas  With regards to presidential duties, yes...
    2
  2.  @soia421  Or he´s the reason why someone got to Jeffrey...
    2
  3.  @gen_z_hippichikk  "Pink squall" ?
    2
  4.  @corit8976  Russian trolls doesn´t "kid"... They bring up "stoopid" fake points...
    1
  5.  @goldbud2287  Exemplify, comrade...
    1
  6.  @ReeCooks14579  Since there´s no mention of "absolute immunity" in there shouldn´t it, according to Scotus "logic", be up to the states ?
    1
  7.  @ReeCooks14579  Did you not read my comment ? It´s not in there, silly...
    1
  8.  @ReeCooks14579  There´s, STILL nothing about it in the US constitution... Or could you provide an excerpt ?
    1
  9.  @ReeCooks14579  So then, according to a certain earlier Scotus decision, they can´t rule on it and it´s "up to the states"... Or should there be different rules for different things that´s NOT in there ?
    1
  10.  @ReeCooks14579  Well, since there´s no mention of it in any constitution...
    1
  11.  @sabaha4637  Yep, you´re a Russian troll...
    1
  12. Zero...
    1
  13. Or you can learn to read...
    1
  14.  @bestlaidplans4511  Nope... This confirms what we knew...
    1
  15.  @stanleynguyen1797  Who TF is "Branden" ?
    1
  16.  @ghostman1063  And no one but the extreme right is arguing against what he does with regards to his presidential duties...
    1
  17.  @Cass-lv1on  Sure we do...
    1
  18.  @dennispatrick4999  Except, unlike with #45 Cheato, there´s no evidence or even a non-biased suspicion...
    1
  19.  @youngmarl9351  Wouldn´t that be "unAmerican" ?
    1