Comments by "Tracy S" (@tracys169) on "Idaho Murder House Demolition Delayed" video.

  1. I'm going to guess that the owner of the rental property/house just wants to get out from under it (or need money) so that's why they want to just demolish and sell/rent out or rebuilt then sell/rent out. I mean, okay, this happened from last year, at least 9-10 months ago, no one has occupied the house, but the owner of the property has to keep paying the mortgage monthly and the property tax on a 'dead' property, they can't live there, no can do to selling/renting it out. It's good and dandy to not demolish the property before the trial is over but who's going to keep paying a property you can't use? Do you just let it go to foreclosure and screw up your credit? What if you're not part of the 1 percenter and can't afford to keep up paying the mortgage and property tax (plus insurance) so having this house is like money pit or some sort? I can kind of understand why the owner of the property wants to move on immediately to recoup any financial loss they have. If they don't want the house to be demolished, they probably should either purchase the property or pay the mortgage and tax and insurance for it until the trial is over....ETA: Oh so the house belongs to the University now, like the previous owner, the university is not in the business of losing $$. They're all about making $$, so I'm not surprised they want to move the property quickly.
    1
  2. money is the main reason. Whoever owns the property wants to make money because property cost--mortgage-property tax-insurance. A property (house plus land in this case) not being used by anyone is loss of money. Imagine you just threw $5-6k a month on something you can not use. You can't live in it, you can't rent it out, you can't do anything to it and it's just standing there while you're bleeding money monthly.
    1