Comments by "" (@louistournas120) on "COP28 president says comments on science behind eliminating fossil fuels "taken out of context"" video.

@OceanFrontVilla3 Dude, everyone is collapsing because of those boosters. I am collapsed right now. I even work on the project and my goal is to cause harm. It has always been my dream to become a scientist and become megarich and fly in private jets and that is what I a doing right now. The only thing that matters is making money. I am also getting my pilot's license. I am going to fly the chemtrail planes.
5
@Smokedouttasian I don’t know what technology you want to invent that you regard as the perfect solution, but there has been a strong push back for EV. I think it was the Ford EV1. It was part of the contract that you do not own it. Ford took all the vehicles back, crush them, destroyed them. Behind the scene, my guess is that at Ford and the same goes for the other large companies, research into new battery technology was banned. Developing an EV is banned. The only solution was a new company: Tesla. Ford and such large companies offered Telsa to come and sell it at their dealership. Tesla refused. Tesla sold directly to consumers and became a large success. How is it that Ford, Chrysler, GM, Lincoln, Volkwagen, Honda, Hyundai, Toyota are well established and could not do this themselves? There is something weird going on. What about Dell, Apple, Compaq, HP and the other megacorporations? They are unable to make an easily repairable and parts interchangeable cellphone and laptop? Yet, you have the PinePhone, Tuxedo, Framework who are small guys and they do exactly that. How is that possible? The big corporations do exactly what they want to do, they know what they want to know, they don’t know what they don’t want to know. “the average citizen changing their life to a sustainable one will not make a difference its already proven in many studies, the only ways we can mitigate human effects on the climate is we need to invent new tech and techniques for resource collection” ==I am interested in these studies. Show them to me. Look at the difference between Alberta and Quebec. Alberta wants to push for mining their oil sands. The natives who live near there and other people are against it since processing oil sands is very polluting. I would like to know if Alberta has any plans long term. Look at Quebec. They are putting vehicle charging places all over the place. Most of the energy production or all of it is Hydro power. They calculate that if all vehicles are converted to EV, Quebec will need 3.5 Romain power plants. Romain is the name of one of their power plants. I don’t know how how many megawatt it produces. They are already building one or near completion. 2 y or 1 y ago, they signed a 24 billion$ contract to sell power to New York. //Edit: I think Romaine-1 is a 1550 MW station.
2
@rockymountainman7 " It shows that Al Gore's credibility is also not that high." ==Sure. Then we should listen to what the climate scientists are telling us.
2
@schrempskynate8944 He said You just wait around and do nothing except for stuffing your face with popcorn, friend. Maybe english is not his first language. You should see my mother. Her french is of poor quality but when she speaks with people, people are able to understand her.
1
Is this evidence that global warming is not caused by humans?
1
@Smokedouttasian I don’t know how reliable solar, wind, geothermal is. For Quebec, most of the energy is hydro power and it is very reliable. It will always depend on the region. For example, Germany is moving away from coal and are investing heavily into wind power. Some people use batteries. Some use molten salt: NaNO3. When there is a dip in power generation, the molten NaNO3 at 450 C is used to generate power. I assume they use the Peltier effect. Germany seems to have a long history of having great chemists, great physicist. It is also a benefit to them when they don’t have oil tycoons. Quebec also doesn’t have petrol and no petrol tycoons here. In the case of the USA, the republican party seems to be all oil tycoons. For example, Donald is not an oil tycoon but since he is a republican, he says “Wind energy? It causes cancer. And what do you do when there is no wind. Little johhny will be in the dark, unable to do his homework.” I am paraphrasing but I saw he say something like that in a couple of speeches. What he is saying “Absolutely not. We are not going to invest in anything else.” There was the case of the electric tank. Donald was making fun of it. He said, now they are trying to make an eco friendly tank. The reality is that China is doing research on it. The benefit is to have a silent vehicle. I don’t know much else about it. I don’t know if it is a practical idea. I’m just showing you the attitude of the republicans. I told you about the attitude of Ford, Chrysler and the rest. I don’t know how reliable industrial scale batteries are. Instead of crushing the EV1, how about the CEOs and their team of research act like teachers: get on TV, show us what the data shows, what the problems are, what they are trying to solve. If a battery needs replacement, the energy generated by the system (wind, solar, etc) would be used by the factories to make a new one. Exactly how much it would cost, I wouldn’t know. “what people perceive as living a sustainable life style” ==That is something else. I’m not even sure what a sustainable life style is. If you want to recycle metal and glass, that is the best. For plastic, they tend to recycle PET and polyethylene but most of it goes to land fills or some other country. People are being lied to about this plastic recycling stuff. The EV is here. The big boys found out that it is hard to push back. The top guys are getting older and they will die. The next generation realizes that the problems will happen on their time. So, now we have the big car boys advertising their EV on TV here in Quebec. I am seeing plenty of Teslas and other EV in the streets. I would not be surprised if half of cars on the street become EV by 2030. Another solution would be to keep using gasoline cars. Make industry that will use the hydro electricity to make something like gasoline. That way, all cars from 1900 and upwards continue to function.
1
@Smokedouttasian Yes, petrol is used as a starting point to make other chemicals. We know that ethene is produced from which polyethylene is made. That is one example. Various color chemicals are made. Drugs are made as well. It is a concentrated ready source of molecules and also energy. The problem is that in the ~1900s, when petrol was discovered in Texas, it was viewed as an Atlantic ocean of petrol. They didn’t take into account the population explosion and gradually, more people leave rural life and become city dwellers. Every nation wants to live like this. Yes, petrol will still be used since society is entirely founded on it. In fact, the reason why we exist is petrol. They use the energy of petrol to make fertilizers, which is used for growing wheat and stuff Maybe they should move such companies nearer to hydro power production. For the USA, the republican party and half the population is married to petrol. They are not interested in anything else at all. To me it looks like only the USA is in trouble. Their deals with Kuweit and Saudi Arabia is helping them get cheap petrol but that is not going to last forever. Saudi Arabia is said to have 1400 y of petrol at the current rape of consumption. Imaging how much CO2 that will release by the year 3400. Other countries are already changing. Everything is an experiment since everything is being done for the first time. Don’t worry. The usage of petrol won’t suddenly stop.
1
@waxpants "remember when he said the ice caps would be melted by 2013" ==Global warming is a hot political topic and as usual, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Al Gore said something like that. Citing researchers during a 2009 climate change conference, Al Gore said there was a 75% chance that ice in the Arctic could be gone during at least some summer months within 5 to 7 years. Reports indicate that he misrepresented the details of the research. The exact quote from Al Gore is: "Some of the models suggest to Dr. Wieslav Maslowski that there is a 75% chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next 5 to 7 years." Dr. Wieslav Maslowski responded to that a day after by saying he had not given exact numbers, such as 75%.
1
@alexisborden3191 “Literally every single Manufacturer you mentioned sells an EV except Lincoln which is just a subsidiary of Ford.” ==That’s only recently. The demand for EV was present in the 90s. The EV-1 of Ford was working well but they have too few components that could fail and therefore, this is counter to the capitalism market. So, I don’t know what they discussed behind closed doors and they decided to destroy all the cars and bury the project. It is only when Tesla came along and became a big success, that they realized, that Tesla is going to get bigger. You can’t convince people to not recycle and not care about the environment. By 2016, it was possible to buy a EV from the other big boys but you can’t just show up at the dealership and pick one up. You have to place an order and wait at least 6 months. I don’t know what the situation is today. Yes, capitalism comes into conflict with being ecofriendly. One group says to recycle, not waste energy. The other group causes more waste to be produced.
1
@Smokedouttasian “stopping in using oil will only reduce the funding for research, development, infrastructure building and make the lives of the average citizen harder to higher prices” ==Maybe you are taking it too literally. I don’t think the people with the “stop oil” posters mean to stop petrol usage suddenly. We are alive bc of petrol. The energy from petrol and coal is used to make a lot of NH3, some of which is converted to NO2, which is converted to HNO3. Some of the NH3 goes directly to the farming fields. They spray it into the soil and it mixes with the water in the soil. Some of the NH3 is combined with HNO3 to make NH4NO3 which goes to the soil as a solid. They also make Ca(NO3)3 which goes to the soil as a solid. Ca3(PO4)2 is mined and goes to the soil. Perhaps, MgSO4 goes to the soil as well. Without all that fertilizer, there would not be enough food per meter square, which means less humans. This is why running out of petrol is dangerous. It could lead to famine.
1
Is that important?
1
@rockymountainman7 "It looks like you don't understand. "Climate change" is political and not environmental." ==What do you mean?
1
@toedrag-release I don't have a problem with that. Use the petrol and build hydro plants, solar plants, wind power plants and electric cars. Also, make some biodiesel. Do that today. Not in 100,000 y. The same goes for your seat belt. The time to put it on is today, not after having an accident. How many people died and became handicap before someone thought "Hey, maybe cars are dangerous and we should invent something." PS: building such plants is going to cost a lot of money and put your country in debt. Your other option is to not build them and keep using petrol and coal forever and enjoy a great economy.
1
@toedrag-release “Right now electric vehicles are great if you live in the city and don't drive much” ==What happens if you drive a lot? What my friend did was that he went to video tape a wedding. The camera’s battery lasts a few hours. Then he switches batteries. The empty battery is placed on charge. He continues to video tape. That is something that has already been proposed but EV car batteries are expensive. Are people willing to pay and keep such batteries at home? “Second you see all the cars at the gas station?” ==Yes, the population has gone up and lifestyle has shifted. Farmers quit and come to the city. We all want the good life. How many are willing to turn backwards, go to the old days of riding a horse or mule and just doing farming? “Now imagine those cars taking hours to fill up and how clogged they'll be” ==The thing is that a discharged battery contains “unprepared chemicals”. They contain the waste product. For example, lead acid batteries contains PbSO4 on the cathode and anode. You need to charge them to get the “prepared chemicals”. We need Pb on the anode and PbO2 on the cathode. That takes energy and time. It is like converting CO2 and H2O back to gasoline. Should we throw the PbSO4 into the streets and just fill up on Pb and PbO2? It can’t be done. The petrol mines contain nearly “prepared chemicals”. They just need to do distillation and reforming and we get the mixture that is called gasoline. They also use petrol as a source of energy to do that work. I don’t know. Maybe capacitors are the solution. “I'm not even going to get into transportation trucks and the fiasco that would be. E.Vs are only competitive because gasoline cars exist so there's less pressure on the charge stations.” ==You think that will be a fiasco? What do you think the future will be like. Let’s say the year is 2300. The world population is 20 billion and even more people are living the good life. Is there going to be enough petrol, platinum, palladium, rhodium, indium in the mines or lithium in the mines? The world is headed to famine, chaos, violence. That is the question: what should we do today? Should we only focus on today’s problems? Should we worry about the year 2300 or 2500 or 4000 or what? “Nuclear is a far better option if an area is able to do so.” ==Whatever humans do, there will be a price to pay since there is no mechanism in nature to deal with the waste. If you mean using uranium, there is a limited amount of U235. Most reactors just split U235 while the U238 gets converted to Pu239 which tends to go to making nuclear weapons. “The building solar fields takes up alot of space for little reward.” ==Solar panels last a long time. I suppose the silicon will suffer from electron migration eventually. I assume each cell can go beyond 100 y. I really don’t know. There is too much I don’t know. Wind power: maybe the turbine would last 50 y. I don’t know. I’m sure that it will suffer from gear wear slowly. “I'm not against renewable energy but the technology we currently have isn't where we need it to be to actually make the country into a sustainable one. The other issue arises that you could take Canada into the stone age literally no emmisions whatsoever and you won't put a dent in climate change. So really it's just a waste of money it'll put Canadians into more hardship and it won't impact anything...so just a waste of time, money and resources.” ==Hydro-Quebec has a research department. The work on battery technology and various things. They collaborate with other labs. Also, for Quebec, if everyone today switches to all EV, there needs to be 1.5 new Romain Power plants built. The Romain is the name of one of their hydro plants. I don’t know how many megawatts it generates. They are building one now or is near completion. Also, last year, they signed a contact with New York. I think it is 24 billion$ worth. They are selling electricity to New York. //Edit: sorry, that is 3.5 Romaine power plants will be needed. I think Romaine-1 is a 1550 W station.
1
@OceanFrontVilla3 I took Moderna for the CV thing. By evening, the area was very warm and swollen. At 1 AM, I woke up feeling very sick. I was feeling weak and on the bathroom floor. I vomited. That was pretty intense. My second dose almost had the same effect. I think a lot of the fear comes from some pediatrician who wrote something about autism in the 199x. Although it was not founded, it spread like wildfire. People point to corruption, capitalism and just various medical malpractices. But you have to look at the entire picture and not just focus on the bad cases. There are plenty of cases where medicine works, where an operation works. Some think that getting the CV is safer than the vaccine. Some people think that there is mercury in the vix (No such thing. There is no vaccne that has mercury. There is thiomersal). There is too much nonsense being spread. These same people drive cars or walk across the street although there are horrific accidents out there.
1