Comments by "afasfedawzdsrf" (@afasfedawzdsrf) on "Do All White People Think The Same About Race? | Spectrum" video.

  1. 301
  2. 54
  3. 39
  4. 37
  5. 37
  6. 37
  7. 34
  8. 33
  9. 26
  10. 21
  11. 17
  12. 16
  13. 14
  14. 13
  15. 12
  16. 12
  17. 11
  18. 9
  19. 9
  20. 9
  21. 8
  22. 8
  23. 8
  24. 7
  25. 7
  26. 7
  27. 7
  28. 7
  29. 7
  30. 7
  31. 7
  32. 7
  33. 7
  34. 7
  35. 6
  36. 6
  37. 6
  38. 6
  39. 6
  40. 6
  41. 6
  42. 6
  43. 6
  44. 6
  45. 5
  46. 5
  47. 5
  48. 5
  49. 5
  50. 5
  51. 5
  52. 5
  53. 5
  54. 5
  55. 5
  56. 5
  57. 5
  58. 5
  59. 5
  60. 4
  61. 4
  62. 4
  63. 4
  64. 4
  65. 4
  66. 4
  67. 4
  68. 4
  69. 4
  70. 4
  71. 4
  72. 4
  73. 4
  74. 4
  75. 4
  76. 4
  77. 4
  78. 4
  79. 4
  80. 4
  81. 4
  82. 4
  83. 4
  84. 4
  85. 4
  86. 4
  87. 4
  88. 4
  89. 3
  90. 3
  91. 3
  92. 3
  93. 3
  94. 3
  95. 3
  96. 3
  97. 3
  98. 3
  99. 3
  100. 3
  101. 3
  102. 3
  103. 3
  104. 3
  105. 3
  106. 3
  107. 3
  108. 3
  109. 3
  110. 3
  111. 3
  112. 3
  113. 3
  114. 3
  115. 3
  116. 3
  117. 3
  118. 3
  119. 3
  120. 3
  121. 3
  122. 3
  123. 3
  124. 3
  125. 3
  126. 3
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. 3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 2
  166. 2
  167. 2
  168.  @deanndramurry1726  no anger issues? The original post is talking about throwing their phone simply because someone said something or almost throwing their phone because someone said something. I'm pretty sure that is basically a huge sign of having anger issues that you are willing to throw something that cost hundreds of dollars as a reaction because of what you hear. I'm kind of worried about you and people around you if you don't consider that reaction out of anger and a possible anger issue. Also it's kind of concerning that you are willing to generalize a whole race by saying "the fact that white people are so entitled" instead of freezing that in a way that shows you realize that not all white people are the same but then again maybe you do things they are all the same. It's also not a fact that black people cannot express their emotions without being called angry or something. It is a fact that black people express their emotions just like every other human being and quite often are able to do it without being called angry. A lot of your comment is just riddled with inaccuracies and generalizations. I find it funny that you try to talk like that to me when you can't even properly handle a conversation yourself without going off the rails and saying inaccurate things and losing your temper and making comments that YouTube immediately deletes which the only reason I know that you said that, is because I got a notification of it despite the fact it was deleted immediately lol. I'll go ahead and respond to that, too though. You don't know for a fact why I'm leaving any comment and you can't prove it either so you don't know that I'm leaving comments just to get reactions and technically speaking any comment to somebody is basically looking for a reaction so you are doing the same but also it's fine if you think I'm a problematic person as you put it, in the comment of yours that YouTube deleted, because that's just your opinion and you are free to have it but your opinion is subjective like everybody else's so it's not a fact just like pretty much everything else you have stated to be a fact when in reality it is not.
    2
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365. 2
  366. 2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379. 2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408. 2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. @backinBlack likeafuneral If you go to Google and type in the word racism then the first dictionary you see won't be Webster. It will look like it's the first dictionary but the first dictionary is the Oxford Dictionary. When you look at the fine print at the bottom of the definition that Google gives you you will see that it says that the definition comes from the Oxford Dictionary. The very next dictionary you see is the web link for the Webster dictionary. The Oxford dictionary doesn't really prove your point. It proves my point. The part that you quoted says nothing about systemic oppression being required therefore it's proving my point and disproving your point. I never said that the word typical doesn't have the word opposite in its definition. I just said that the definition of typical refers to something that commonly happens. If the definition of racism says something about it typically happening to one thing or another then that just means it more often than not happens that way, that does not mean that it doesn't happen outside of what typically happens. An example would be someone asking what their friend usually orders at Subway. You an example would be someone asking what their friend usually orders at Subway. You could say your friend typically gets the tuna sub or the meatball sub. That doesn't mean that your friend only gets one of those two subs. It just means that it's the most common thing that they get. The definition of the word "typically" does not absolutely exclude anything, it just highlights what the most common thing is. I already pointed out that the first thing you find when you search up the word racism on Google is not the Webster dictionary but it's actually Oxford though the way they have it written out it's very easy to miss the little notation and think that it's not the first results because there's no web link but Google is giving you the definition from Oxford dictionaries so that is actually the very first result because it's not Google telling you it's Google showing you the most popular search result for what you looked up which is in this case from Oxford Dictionary.
    1
  530. 1
  531. @backinBlack likeafuneral   Yes the part where it says the right, needs, dignity, or value of people or particular races or geographical Origins. That part right there says nothing about a requirement of Oppression or power Dynamic needed to be present for it to count as racism. It does nothing to prove your point because the word Devaluation Means to underestimate or reduce the worth of someone or something. It has nothing to do with taking something away from anybody. " rac·ism /ˈrāˌsizəm/ Learn to pronounce noun prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized. "a program to combat racism" Similar: racial discrimination racialism racial prejudice/bigotry xenophobia chauvinism bigotry bias intolerance anti-Semitism apartheid the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another. "theories of racism" Definitions from Oxford Languages" There's the oxford dictionary quote with prejudice. I never said that the Oxford dictionary was outdated, that was you that said that and it is not outdated. Even the source that you provided , Webster dictionary's, Basically has the Same multiple different definitions as Oxford but you are only choosing one definition and ignoring the other definitions . I did not answer your question regarding racism and Prejudice because it has no relevancy and I don't know why you brought it up.
    1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. @backinBlack likeafuneral   But the original definition doesn't require power. If anything all that means is they poorly constructed a word for the definition that they had in mind. Either way it still has definitions that don't require power to be present. The idea of the word racism is to have a word defined when all races aren't being regarded equally. For that to happen that means all races have to be considered equally able to fall prey to racism from others. If power is required to be racist then all races aren't equal because then that suggests that one race is immune to racism but for that to happen one race would have to be superior then the others but that would be the very definition of racism so there can be a form of racism that requires power but it can't be the only form of racism otherwise it means they a race could be superior to other races because it couldn't fall prey to racism. Systemic racism aka racism with a power dynamic is a subcategory of racism but it doesn't completely define all possible forms of racism even with ism in the word it doesn't mean that all forms of racism involve power dynamics, practice or a system. Discrimination doesn't require an act of power either to be discrimination. The words may have changed a little with modern society but they still use the old meanings as well as the newer ones depending on each individual situation. Racism is the unequal treatment or belief that one race is better or worse then another. It can also become a racist system of power of enough racists gather together and create a system that treats people unequally based on their race. Prejudice is a preconceived opinion that is not based on reason or actual experience. Gay has meant joy or happiness since the 12th century. It only gained another meaning such as homosexual around 1960 when it was used as slang to refer to homosexuals. It still means happy to this day. The meaning of a word changes depending on the context of the subject and how it's used. The word gay never changed. It just gained another use. Same with the word racism. It never changed, only gained another meaning.
    1
  544. 1
  545. @backinBlack likeafuneral  sorry, I didn't notice the other messages until later. As for the Discrimination part I misunderstood. I thought you were referring to discrimination being an active power in a systemic way. Basically the same thing. Happy. Being happy or lighthearted and carefree. It's not used as often as it used to be but just because it's not used as often doesn't mean that it has lost that definition and that definition no longer applies. If the definition no longer applied then it would not be registered as a definition because it would be incorrect to do so because the dictionary is supposed to list definitions. Words don't fade away and suddenly not exist anymore based on how often people use them and it's the same way with definitions. Just because a word isn't used very often with a specific definition in mind does not mean that definition no longer exists. I still didn't really prove your point. The reason being because if you have prejudice against someone specifically because of their race then the Prejudice then becomes what we call racism by definition. Because no race is better than the other. No race is naturally Superior or inferior to the other. On a base level all races are equal. Even if they are not treated equal that does not change the fact that they are equal. There's a difference between being equal and being treated equally. What is considered professional looking changes with the society and overtime but current-day Society you can pretty easily figure out what is considered professional by thinking of what looks clean and well-kept and does not draw attention. In my opinion I understand how it's easy to see that from a racial Viewpoint given the fact that at least in America the majority of people are white but it doesn't necessarily have to tie in with race. For example tattoos are not restricted by any race but if the majority of people in the country got tattoos then the idea of tattoos being considered unprofessional would probably change. It is possible that it has something to do with race but it's not always guaranteed to have something to do with race and it could just look like it has something to do with race. I mention which parts are my opinion because I don't want you to mistake them as me saying they are fact. I don't see how white people dreads and black people dreads could be different if they are done the exact same way. It seems more like a human or social construct to say they aren't the same if they are done the same way. Actually you can compare anything in the universe. It might not be a comparison that's good enough in your opinion but I literally can compare anything in the universe. Not trying to be rude but a lot of people get that wrong. Just because you don't like a comparison doesn't mean it's not actually comparable. In this instance they are comparable because they are both deemed unprofessional. That is something they both share therefore they are comparable. Like I said it may not seem like a good comparison to you but by definition they are comparable because they both share the issue that they are deemed to appear unprofessional in a workplace. I Can't Tell You Why racism has ism in the word because I was not alive at the time but I can tell you that it has it in the word all the same but it does not change what the definition is. Not everything always makes sense in the world and it just is what it is because it is. Just because it might not make sense doesn't change the fact that it still is what it is. It doesn't matter if they wanted to use a different term instead of homosexual because it just goes to prove my point that the definition doesn't have to have anything to do with the word itself to gain a new meaning. Words can have definitions that have nothing to do with their root meaning and homosexuals adding the definition of being a homosexual to the word gay just proves my point. The reason why they did that doesn't matter because the end result is that they still added a new definition to the word even though the new definition has nothing to do with the roots of the word. In the end it doesn't matter if new definitions are added to words because it doesn't get rid of the old definitions. Even if they aren't used as often they are still a definition of that word. The dictionary has not removed them and it still says that's what the word means. The definition still applies even if it's an older definition. It doesn't matter if one of the definitions doesn't match all the root meanings of the word because it's still the definition of the word. It doesn't have to make sense because not everything in the world makes sense. Human beings are not perfect creatures and therefore their Creations are not perfect.
    1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571.  @milis1963  there are so many things that are factually false, fallacies and just straight-up incorrect with what you have just said. First off the oppressor can be oppressed. That phrase has always been a terrible one because depending on the type of Oppression it is a fact that the oppressor can be oppressed. For example a white person can racially oppress a different person but that same white person can be oppressed for their sexuality aka the oppressor is being oppressed or they could just be oppressed any other number of ways by somebody else so it is a fact that the oppressor can be oppressed. As they say there's always a bigger fish. It's also a fallacy that you were saying that these different races have people being racist to them because they are not white. To a certain degree you are correct but some people are just racist to them because they aren't other races as well. Sometimes it has nothing to do with the fact that they are white, it could be that they aren't Indian, that they are Asian instead of black or vice versa. I know somebody who dated an Indian girl and the girl's mother was racist to him because he wasn't Indian. It's not always about whether or not someone is white. You are now changing your words, you said in your very opening comment that she was made fun of because she was white and now you are changing that and saying that she wasn't. You are changing what you said just to fit your narrative but your narrative is false anyways. You don't speak for the entire Hispanic community. You don't get to say what the whole Hispanic Community does, doesn't do, believes or doesn't believe. You are also factually incorrect saying that white people can only experience bullying and not racism because the definition of the word racism does not exclude them from being able to suffer racism anywhere on the planet under any circumstances.
    1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. @ok and?  I didn't say that you said reverse racism was a thing, you brought it up and so I continued that thought. You open the door to that line of conversation and I was just pointing out that I'm aware it's not a real thing, I was not inferring that you believed it was either because it was pretty clear that you thought it wasn't but I was also mentioning that Reverse Racism is just racism. If you read my comment more clearly you would have most likely understood that and not believed that I was putting words in your mouth which I clearly wasn't. Once again typically means usually, it doesn't mean only so your argument they're still does not stand. Tying that to your next point I will argue both of those with a fact, racism isn't about the oppression olympics, it doesn't matter who has it worse, if something is racist it is racist. One person suffering more than another does not erase that the other is suffering, it does not change their suffering into something else. As I have said your arguments aren't holding any logical standing, rather they are holding more emotional standing. Logic does not dictate, as I have stated that one's suffering is now erased because someone has it worse. If someone has an apple but you give somebody to Apples both people still possess an apple oh, you don't say that now the other person who has less apples has no apples. What you are trying to suggest though is that if a person doesn't experience the same level of racism that they are no longer experiencing racism because it's not as bad or doesn't happen as often but that's not how it works. That is a more emotional response rather than a logical one. No I don't feel personally attacked in the slightest, I honestly wouldn't care much about it if you try to personally attack me. You did say that you believe you can't be racially prejudiced to White people, it's in your own comment. No as I went back to go read further on your previous comment to reply further it seems that you've deleted it so I will just post this hear as is with what I was able to respond with before you deleted your comment preventing me from reading it further since I was writing the message out as I was reading what you wrote.
    1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704. 1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707.  @preciousogunsakin3695  it is a fact that you are judging differently. You are judging people differently deciding what their experiences are, are not, will be and will never be and deciding and judging on what is someone's place to do or say something based on the color of their skin. What is somebody's place to do or not do is not a fact, that's an opinion so yes it is a fact that you are judging based on their skin. People of any race are not the same and do not go through the same experiences all over the world and you do not know what those experiences are going to be like throughout the end of time as you clearly have said that you do know because you said that their experiences will always be the same by saying that they will always go through hardship but the fact is not every person of any race is going to experience the same hardship because things change over time and things are different for different people in different parts of the world. You clearly are judging people and what you think about them based on their skin color based on a small part of the world and what is realistically speaking a small amount of time when you think about how long people have been on the face of the planet yet you're assuming it's always going to be that way and it's going to be the same way all over the planet for the rest of time which is actually quite a logical and not factual because humans change over time just like civilizations among another of other things. Now was it right for her to place the majority of the blame on other people? No it wasn't because she has as much responsibility has anybody when it comes to saying derogatory words but she has just as much right to say it as anybody else does because context is what matters, not the color of her skin when she says a word and words are for everybody. You are clearly judging people based on the color of their skin, you are doing it for moral reasons which is understandable but you are still judging someone by the color of their skin and telling them this is wrong for you or saying this is only right for you which is racist to judge people differently simply because of their skin color which does not define them as a person, what they have done or what they have experienced. It may be an indicator of what they have gone through but it does not decide for them what they will or have gone through despite all your implications that it does.
    1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712.  @FRANXMMM  it was at the very beginning, about 1 minute and 24 seconds into it, it was one of the very first things he said. He said that he believes all black people can relate because they've been through similar experiences like oppression and whatnot, paraphrasing slightly but like I said you can look at the one minute 24 second Mark for the exact quoting. He was asked the same thing about white people but he said no so he didn't view white people the same way but he grouped all black people together and a black person or anybody of any color in one part of the world is going to have completely different life experiences in a different part of the world, they aren't going to be able to connect simply because of their skin color like he is suggesting. They might have similar experiences but they're not guaranteed to like he is suggesting simply because of their skin color. I also didn't care for his misunderstanding of culture believing that there is a thing such as race culture. There is racial culture in specific areas but that's more of race plus culture plus location. Culture is the way you live your life, your traditions and whatnot so there might be black American culture and white American culture but it's not Black Culture or white culture because if that was true then it'd be the same in other countries but it's not. Irish culture and Indian culture are the same wherever you go, there might be different subsections kind of like religion but even those will be the same wherever you go but black American culture and white American culture will be different from black European culture and white European culture and he was completely ignorant on that and I don't mean that in an offensive way I just mean it in the way that he lacked knowledge.
    1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. On one hand I understand where you're coming from but on the other there's a lot of issues with your logic. The first and one of the most glaring issues is that no race completely thinks the same way. You will find black people who have no issue with anybody saying it, some that have issues with others saying it depending on their race and then some that will have issues with anybody saying it regardless of your race. It's a bit of a case by case basis at best but there will also be hypocrisy where people will say what you have said but then they will say ignore those black people because it's my opinion that matters, I don't like their opinion regarding this topic so ignore theirs. Another glaring issue with your logic is that though your opinion on the matter is understandable it's still racist thinking. One's race is not going to stop a word from being offensive, a black person saying the word could have it be just as offensive, on purpose, and a white person, an asian, and Indian Etc so to say that Only One race can say it doesn't actually do anything except create more racism because the difference is based on someone's race. Now I'm not necessarily saying that you think it's only okay if black people say it but you are saying that the only person's opinion that matters on the topic is a black person but this as I just described is how some black people feel which is illogical and as I have stated also racist. One's race doesn't inherently Grant you extra intelligence or logic or less of such things. It also doesn't guarantee that you have suffered the same way as another person or that you suffered more or even less so it's kind of racist to say only their opinion matters versus saying that someone who has gone through things of such nature has a more valid opinion because race as I have stated does not guarantee that they have experienced anything. Like I said at first your opinion on the matter is completely understandable and afterwards it still is to a degree but it's also very flawed reasoning and more so emotional reasoning than it is logical.
    1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002.  @sbn6340   First off I didn't answer your question what my race was but it seems that you made the assumption anyway and likely simply because I have told you that you're wrong. Making assumptions like that simply because you don't like what you hear isn't very productive. Secondly cannot prove that is always and always will be the truth about white people. Right now and specifically in certain places of the world that is likely to be the case and to be the case for a long time but I highly doubt you can factually prove that is true everywhere in the world and it will always stay that way. It is a fact that all races can experience "racism". It is clearly shown in the Oxford dictionary, one of the most well known and most accepted dictionaries in the world, that no race is excluded under any condition from being able to be the victim of "racism". You seem to keep trying to change the direction of the conversation. First you say white people cannot experience racism and I point out how that is factually incorrect and then you change gears and attempt to say it would never be the same kind of racism. The thing is that racism is still racism. If something is bad then it is still bad, just because something is worse or happens to a worst degree doesn't negate the fact that it's still bad in both cases. Even if one group has greater experiences with racism then another that does not mean that either case of racism is any more acceptable then the other. Trying to say that white people won't experience the same level of racism as a counter to my point that white people can experience racism really does not reflect well on you because it makes you come across as if you want to play the victim, either you want to be the only one who can experience racism and if that won't work then you want to be the one that experiences worse racism excetera excetera. The point was that you were wrong that white people can't experience racism so it was kind of irrelevant for you to suddenly talk about who experiences or could experience worse levels of racism. Also I feel I should probably point out to you since one of your other comments on this video involved you saying that racism was a system built by white people, that is horrifically incorrect. All races have had a part in racism. For example slavery started in the United States not because of white people but because African-Americans sold other African-Americans to white people in the United States and that's how slavery started in the United States.
    1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041.  @omartistry  yes and no. There's no such thing as a race culture per say, things tend to get more confusing. Race describes facial features and things like that but it doesn't describe a way of life. It's something that is honestly very easy to confuse and get mixed up with because of how the media and everything has portrayed things. There is kind of a thing as race + geography + culture such as African-American or white American culture but there isn't exactly Black Culture or white culture because that changes from place to place. Black Culture in America is different from Black Culture in Europe and so on and so forth. It's one of those things that is named one thing but it's not actually what it's named after if that makes any sense. Like in America something is named a part of black culture but black culture in the United States is completely different from Black Culture in a different part of the world so it's really not Black Culture it's more of African American culture but honestly even at that point there is the possibility that African-American culture on one side of the country is different from African-American culture on another side of the country, a bit less likely than it is to be different in another country entirely but yeah so it's really more of race plus culture plus geography rather than an actual race culture and that is the same for any race because race isn't culture but you can have racial culture of sorts in certain geographies but they will differ based on geography.
    1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089.  @jeksoudnemei  can you factually proved beyond a doubt though that white people are the creators of racism? I mean you're basically claiming that white people created hate. You're claiming that white people are the reason that there's racism with all races all over the world. It's also not something all that sudden just because you are hearing about it in the news or because you were hearing about it personally. There have been white people talking about suffering from racism for over fifty years. On top of that not every part of the world has white people in power or white people as the majority so you are really seeming to speak with a very United States centric mindset but acting as if that's the way the whole world is which is very far from the truth. You are making a fallacy assuming that just because someone says they suffered racism that they want to be oppressed which is completely inaccurate. Let's say that you are correct, hypothetically speaking that white people created racism. Just because they created racism doesn't mean they can't suffer from it. The person who created fire can still be burned, the person who created the concept of con artists could still be conned. Just because something is created by somebody doesn't mean they can't suffer from their own creation. I'm not sure why people seem to think that it's not possible. If you want to know how a white person can suffered racism just Look up the definition which you should already know because you say that it needs to be changed which suggests that you already know the definition. All you have to do is believe that white people are inferior to another race or treat someone differently in a negative manner specifically because they are white.
    1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123.  @AllenQuatermain2de    yes I could have gone on and on but no one would want to read that and you could still end up ignorantly saying the same thing because the world is so vast that no matter how many examples I could give you could still ignorantly claim that it's not enough. Also you are correct that they are similar but that does not mean they are the same so they are all separate examples in the end. It seems you're unhappy with that fact. If you want to prove anything then at the very least you have to list off more examples supporting your argument than mine but I have some pretty high doubts that you will go that far to prove your point or rather attempt to prove your point. I already proved you wrong by proving that according to definitions that feelings and opinions are the same thing. Everybody can feel differently about things, nobody is guaranteed to feel the same way about something as the next person AKA their opinions aren't guaranteed to be the same. You are choosing to blindly be ignorant about this because you don't want things to be this way. Honestly I doubt you would even agree if YouTube would let me show a screenshot of the definitions to prove you wrong but all you have to do is Google the words "opinion definition" and "feeling definition" to see that you are incorrect on this subject. If you want to try and prove me wrong I suggest trying to put some more effort into your argument because as it stands it's only your opinion AKA your feelings and not a fact.
    1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. 1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176.  @hhwwaa  it's kind of funny that you say it's not your place to decide who should and should not say it when your whole argument gives off huge Vibes that you do believe it is your place. I mean if it is not your place to say then it is not your place to tell other people to learn their place either because if it is not your place all you are is to be an observer unless specifically asked but you were not specifically asked therefore you are going back on what you are saying with the whole thing of it not being your place. Like I said before a slur is a slur. It doesn't matter if it was used improperly, if someone uses it towards somebody with negative connotation then they are trying to insult somebody. If the N word is used with negative intent towards an Asian it doesn't matter that the person is Asian because the person saying the word is trying to hurt the other person. You are getting too hung up on things and missing the important details. It is true that it was mainly used as an oppressive word towards black people but that does not mean that only black people can suffer from it. Tell me do you have factual statistics to prove that most black people on the face of the planet say that it's only okay when a black person uses the word? To me it seems more like you are just basing off of your personal experience. To say that "most say" is to say that over 50% are saying that and given how many people there are that's highly unlikely that you have statistics on that to prove what you say and it's more of just your opinion based off of your personal experience. So once again do you have statistics to prove that over 50% of the black population of the entire world are saying what you are saying with this word? Let me also point out that you are correct as I said earlier that it has historically been used towards black people but it is not a word that is highly likely to have been used against them much at all these days. It is much easier to go through life without hearing that word once nowadays and much likelier that someone will not be called that word these days so your argument doesn't really hold a whole lot of water there either because it suggests that every black person has been oppressed by this word when they haven't. The argument isn't why can't I say this word, the argument is about equality. You aren't treating people equally based on their race. You are looking at people and treating them differently based off of the color of their skin and telling them that an action is right or wrong simply because of the way they were born which is racism. You are trying not to be racist but you are going so far over the edge that you are into racist territory now. Now we come back full-circle to the whole know your place thing oh, you said it is not your place but here you are telling other people that they should know their place. If you truly thought it was not your place then you can't tell other people what you are saying. It is important to listen to everybody's voices especially particular groups about their struggles but just because they belong to a particular group doesn't mean that they are right or they are not being racist. Just because someone does something because they are white doesn't mean they are racist and just because someone is black doesn't mean that what they feel isn't racist either. Equality is treating everybody equally and telling somebody that what they are doing is wrong simply because of the color of their skin and if they're skin color was different then it would be okay for them, it doesn't matter your reasoning that is treating someone unequally and by definition racist.
    1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271.  @AgentNolies  this situation and what would likely occur in that situation are different though. Chances are very high that there would be at least one person asking for proof where you have not. I never said that there wasn't proof that I was correct, I simply didn't mention it because it was unnecessary at the current time. If you would like me to go ahead I can do so. Think about it, there are many ways to prove that something belongs to someone, that it is exclusively theirs. There are legal documents, there are customer receipts and things of such nature but there is no such thing for language. It is definitely true that we attribute certain languages to certain groups but all languages are used across all Races and anybody can use them at any time, it doesn't belong to any one person or group despite the fact it may have been created solely by A specific group. On top of that the argument that they could take a word back implies that it was theirs to begin with but if we go with the argument that language could belong to anybody then the word would actually belong to those who created the English language so even if we adopt that line of logic it still doesn't make sense to say that they could take it back but as I've already said language does not belong to anybody. When I was inferring that nobody could factually prove me wrong it was to state that there was no way to prove that one could own language unlike being able to prove ownership over anything else and if you cannot prove that it is yours then it is not yours legally speaking.
    1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1