Comments by "I am Kesha" (@iamkesha.) on "Tucker responds to Pentagon's criticism of his show" video.
-
34
-
18
-
13
-
11
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
@11111110 Who said it is stupid to have maternity? I didn’t. Tucker didn’t. His discussion was specific to ‘maternity flight suits, combat and scuba gear.’ What Biden bragged about. Yes, women serves in multiple roles and remain active while pregnant. Again, I’m retired from the Navy, had 3 different pregnancies, 1 live birth. I’m speaking from my experience, having been stationed on an air craft carrier, not stationed on but frequent Air Force bases for medical/dental, groceries, PT, child care, basically all of my needs except living there, those who wore flight suits were all pilots or worked within that field or community. As a former cryptologist/IT wouldn’t wear a flight suit UNLESS I was stationed with a helo squadron or that community. Not being on the carrier but being within those air communities.
1
-
@stacihilliard3761 For me, it seems like you just want to be offended by Tucker and you did exactly at you accuse Tucker of doing by choosing to use dissect only his talking point while ignoring biden comment was left open to scrutiny. But we are living in a time when msms will never comment on biden wrongdoing, (the exact opposite from how they treated the previous administration) so when one person does, people attack.
As for him pointing out Austin race got him hired, when this press secretary loves to say ‘person in x position is a woman,’ shouting out identity politics not experience for the appointment to that position, you are being selective. If you don’t see something suspicious or actually unethical with SECDEF previous job coming from a top position in one of the top defense contracting companies, when DoD is the largest portion of the government budget, the reality of the military industry complex, bidding for billion dollar defense contracts, it seems your complaints about Tucker report is being led by the same identity politics this administration focuses on the superficial and not experience or logistics.
I don’t watch Tucker but you claim he is using ‘red meat’ and then ‘criticize his base.’ Do you do that to cnn, msnbc and others where some of their on air personalities spout ‘red meat for their base’ biases as well? It seems like that’s how they attract their audience but only one side gets criticized.
1
-
1
-
@stacihilliard3761 You can say the same why biden handlers wrote for him to read something or promoted what is logistically not accurate without them doing basic research on its accuracy. It goes both ways. The whole thing is a distraction and a waste of time and money on research, development and implementation for something that makes no sense. My problem with this promoting a one piece maternity flight suit makes no sense. Think about this, your pregnant with a growing belly and butt, having to go to the bathroom frequently, every time you have to pull down that one piece suit, pull it down from over your shoulders, wiggle it down past your belly and butt under your knees, do you think that’s more comfortable than just pulling down a pants, leaving your top in place. It is about the logistics of it. How many one piece pants-like not dresses maternity clothing have long sleeves? The one piece pants-like that is available for regular maternity wear are normally overalls with snap closures. FYI, flight suits/coveralls are tailored for men because it zips in both directs so ‘he’ can zip up, pull out, pee, zip down, finish. Personally speaking, I don’t see how that can be changed to better suit women while keeping its functionality.
Going back to the distraction, this made the rounds on the news and continue to be talked about meanwhile biden dismantled Title IX protection for biological women by adding identity in it. No one is talking about that. The reason Title IX was implemented is no longer relevant since male bodies can now take women scholarships and opportunities they were once purview to. Why isn’t that headline news?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1