Comments by "Robert Atkins" (@robertatkins9419) on "Ukraine could “force Putin into a ceasefire” as China withdraws support | Michael Binyon" video.

  1. And that won't happen - Child
    4
  2. Because it can't be. How dare you even suggest that I wouldn't win a fifteen round boxing match against Mile Tyson?
    2
  3. But what you advocate - more arms supplies - is precisely the opposite of 'support'.
    2
  4. And this comment of yours makes YOU the monster
    2
  5. You obviously haven't been following this conflict at all
    2
  6.  @TheLucidscreamz  Who's 'corpse mountain'? Ukraine's? Well, that's what Lindsey Graham openly advocates, whilst claiming at the same time to be on Ukraine's side. Guess you two are birds of the same putrid feather
    2
  7. And how do you 'tell' us all that? How and when did you get inside info on how the Russian navy and air force were feeling?
    2
  8. That's would be Michael Clarke.
    2
  9. There will be no Russian retreat, haven't you got that yet?
    2
  10. And how do you account for that 'dithering'? How come there's no 'dithering' whatever in all the support that Russia is supposedly getting from China, Iran, and North Korea? Are they just not ditherers, while the west is?
    2
  11. And all you can do is spout a cheap western propaganda talking point
    2
  12. And you are a cheap LIAR
    1
  13.  @TauNomm  They're not being 'conquered'. You need to change your perspective in order to understand what Russia is doing and why it is doing it. It is not about Russia 'conquering' anyone. It is about@ 1/ Stopping NATO expansion into Ukraine; and 2/ Ensuring the security of the people of Donbass.
    1
  14.  @TauNomm  But it isn't lies, that's the point, and that's the truth.
    1
  15.  @sunnypedaal  All creeps like you can do is accuse anyone who makes a point of being a 'kremlin troll'. Don't ever address any point that's made - just hurl a cheap, childish insult
    1
  16. Your take, in line with that of the entire collective west, is disastrously wrong. For Russia, they are absolutely defending their homeland
    1
  17. NO, actually it's 60,000 - and that's from the Pentagon. What's 'scary' is the extent that LIARS like you are willing to go
    1
  18. But the Black Sea Fleet hasn't left. And you posses not a single jot of sophrosune.
    1
  19.  @wenterinfaer1656  They never claimed that they would take Kiev in three days. When are you going to stop falling for western propaganda lies?
    1
  20. Yet another cheap trash-taking LIAR
    1
  21. And you know precisely nothing
    1
  22.  @mnoot7209  Langley Liar Alert!
    1
  23. Hello Mr Dumbo
    1
  24. And thinking that you would be capable of making a sensible non-bigoted point - now that would really be idiotic
    1
  25.  @dennisshaw1195  What 'facts'? You haven't got any facts. And that's one problem with bigots: all they've got, and to them all they need, is their bigotry. Another problem is that they accuse others of the very blindness that they themselves are stricken by. And there's nothing 'funny' about any of that.
    1
  26.  @dennisshaw1195  Try to be informed yourself. The fact is that Putin said that he had no desire to invade, which was the truth, but that circumstances may force their hand. Try to be better informed instead of just listening to your petty, jealous, bigotry.
    1
  27. And Russia too has zero desire or intention of a ceasefire. But, contrary to what you say, the vast majority of ordinary Ukrainians actually do want a ceasefire, its only their psychopathic leaders who don't. Is there something about that you can't understand?
    1
  28. But he isn't 'following the Moscow line'. If he was he would have pointed to the demonstrable fact that China is not withdrawing its support.
    1
  29.  @leetommerson639  Completely agree. Do you think that maybe they've got two implicit propaganda suggestions to infiltrate into as many as they can: 1/ That China is withdrawing its support from Russia, a provably false statement; and 2/ That our leaders in the collective west are still hankering after that 'ceasefire' or 'conflict freeze' idea, the one floated months ago by, e.g. Richard Haas, the idea being to have a pause in which the west can re-arm itself, and then they can get the ball rolling all over again?
    1
  30. I say old boy, you're so woefully benighted
    1
  31. The trouble is, though, that China hasn't withdrawn its support, and all that propaganda like this can do is further consolidate China's support. That's the problem with lies - they have no substance
    1
  32.  @jacksmith-mu3ee  What's Israel got to do with this?
    1
  33.  @jacksmith-mu3ee  Okay, but I didn't mention Israel. My purpose was to highlight the fact that Times Radio simply made up the story about Russia - China division. But furthermore, even if China did actually withdraw its support of Russia it would not, anyway, 'force Putin into a ceasefire'.
    1
  34.  @Tiasung  Good point. I reckon that this person actually doesn't think before they write, perhaps because they're just too consumed by their own Russophobic hatred.
    1
  35. And I call BS on this utterly ignorant comment of yours
    1
  36.  @samhaskins2506  You might as well ask me why I think that, for example, the Pentagon, won't be allowing squatters to move in there anytime soon.
    1
  37. But, as always, nowhere near as many as the Langley Liars
    1
  38.  @majorrgeek  Why are you misquoting me? I never said that anything 'won't happen'. What I said is that it hasn't happened - China has not withdrawn its support to Russia.
    1
  39. But they don't have them. Don't you follow the news of something? Didn't you hear what NATO Admiral Rob Bauer confessed six months ago?
    1
  40.  @cap3001  Actually, nothing was 'granted', and nothing needed needed to be 'granted'.
    1
  41. And too bad you suffer from the same lack of knowledge, otherwise you'd realize that that's the lesson Russia is teaching the collective thugs of the west.
    1
  42. And you. no doubt, are on Langley's payroll
    1
  43. No one 'granted' Crimea to Russia. The fact that you have to lie means there is no substance whatever in what you say.
    1