Comments by "bas kir" (@vinsin328) on "Why do NRIs u0026 immigrants feel so strongly about Hindu nationalism" video.

  1. It is not Hindu nationalism but Brahmavadi nationalism.
    4
  2. Pride in what? Caste system, women discrimination, Brahmavad, food terrorism, etc.
    4
  3. Congress pampered Brahmavadi not Muslims. Congess is not responsible if hindus converted to Brahmavadi and stopped having beef. West issue is different compared to Indians. Indians issue is Brahmavad and low meat consumption and for which no one is responsible expect they themselves. Food terrorism is the issue of Hindus.
    3
  4. File a case with evidence then.
    2
  5. There were no lies and propaganda.
    2
  6. And what is that?
    2
  7. You must be a Brahmavadi slave I can bet.
    2
  8. Still they failed to translate Ramayana in any language before done by an American Professor. Yep proud of Sati, Untouchability, food terrorism, breast tax etc. Assertive in and for what?
    2
  9. They support Brahmavad, that is the problem.
    2
  10. Hindus are standing for what that is the problem - majority of them are Brahmavadi and are food terrorists and support untouchability and human decrimination based on food habits. HIndus are incapabale of doing any reforms, all were forced on them.
    2
  11. Same is with Brahmavad.
    2
  12. Those politicians were not anti-hindu but anti-Brahmavad.
    2
  13. true, but they are seen as Brahmavadi - food terrorists, sati, praticing untouchability, anti-women etc. If you do not support those things then why do they support Modi. In USA, hindus took rally with bulldozer symbolizing to destroy each and every Muslim house, why? In UK Hindus took street shouting Jai Shree Ram and wanted to kill Muslims in the name of Ram, in germany some demanded ban on beef.
    1
  14.  @adityakumarranjan4429  Then why forcing beef eating Hindus to convert.
    1
  15. So you are proud of Sati?
    1
  16. food terroism is not inclusion. lack of dignity of work is not inclusion. sati is not inclusion, breast tax is not inclusion, two marriage if you own a cow is not inclusion, etc. What you are talking about Hinduism and what is he talking about is Brahmavad.
    1
  17. Tibet was gifted by India. Chinese in other countries do not support those unlike Brahmavadi.
    1
  18. There is lot more critique on Pan Islamism than Brahmavad. Islamism is not anti-human as compared to Islam. Baal Ganghar tilak killed 10 millions Hindus for refusing to pray to rats and getting rabies. You will not find such examples in any other culture. HIndus and Hindutva are different.
    1
  19. And who begged for it - Brahmavadi (Nehru and Gandhi) under liaquat Nehru Pact.
    1
  20. Then why beef is banned by some states.
    1
  21. And brahmavadi?
    1
  22. Because all indologists exists in the west as Brahmavadi has banned the conversion of Hindu books into regional languages as they fear that Hindus will start eating beef. So where should a hindu go?
    1
  23. There is no Christian Ummah. Nope beef eating Hindus cannot visit Ayodhya. It is the Britishers who made India best by opposing Brahmavad,
    1
  24.  @nivnara  Not true. Most migrate India because of Brahmavad.
    1
  25. Nope no british lords invaded India, they liberated it and made India. Beef eating culture is gobe, sati is gone, two marriages is gone, breat tax is gone, Brahmins sleeping with lower caste on the day of marriage is gone : what is left?
    1
  26. True but why then beef is banned in many states of India. Nope British saved Hindutva from Brahmavad as long as possible. British are not reposible for a beef eating nation to suddenly start worshiping cows. British banned Brahmins to collect breast tax, sati, sleeping with non-Brahmins etc.
    1
  27. Brahmavad is a religion, not Hinduism.
    1
  28. Muslims are not majority in Britain.
    1
  29. Not true. Only Brahmavadi support Modi. Modi has nothing to do with hindutva.
    1
  30. Nope they are not. They are food terrorists and Brahmavadi.
    1
  31. Millions of back humans were not there. That is the problem with Brahmavad psyche. Trying to save themselves under beef eating Hindus.
    1
  32. Nope print never asked for beef ban for Hindus. You are Brahmavadi so why worried about Hindus? Do you love beef eating Hindus and meat eating Rama and Btutcher Sita? Nope you hate Hindus, I can bet.
    1
  33. Brahmavadi does not.
    1
  34. So you eat beef. You are correct but the west sees that as a support for Brahmavad. There is a big difference between Chistianity and Brahmavad.
    1