Comments by "bas kir" (@vinsin328) on "The new ‘Hindu rate of growth’ is here. It’s called 7% and it’s just not enough" video.

  1. Okay, but they were Hindus.
    1
  2.  @bhikariman-sigmamale  Because Nehru was a stauch Hindu. Indian freedom fighting is socialism.
    1
  3. You need to have social changes too, you have to fight with Brahmavad.
    1
  4.  @NN-wh6fn  Not true, per capita meat consumption is quite low which means high diabetes and stunted children. It has become headquater of Brahmavadi.
    1
  5. india is divided by food habits or Brahmavad
    1
  6. You have to ask Raj Krishna. That is how Brahmavadi decided to mock Hindus.
    1
  7. He was not communist. He was anti-communists. But he was Brahmavadi.
    1
  8. Brahmavad is a better word.
    1
  9. He is not an economists.
    1
  10. You are not 100% correct. Ban on beef, low meat consumption, depending on state subsidies, stunted growth but at the same time high export of protein - who is responsible.China cultural revolition led the pave for those high growth rate.
    1
  11. That was population. Population isn't equivalent to GDP since the industrial revolution, or 400 years. Why not before Brahmavad?
    1
  12. Check with economists.
    1
  13. That would be liberal growth rate or secular growth rate.
    1
  14. So socialist were not Hindus.
    1