Comments by "bas kir" (@vinsin328) on "India's fraught new neighbourhood — hostile, under pressure, tense u0026 compromised" video.

  1. Why Indians worried about BD future? Most of the Indians wanted to attack BD.
    1
  2. Do Hindus worry about hindus of India?
    1
  3. cows?
    1
  4. The official states was loaded with domestic politics.
    1
  5. We are Kafirs, we are non-Brahmins, we are untouchable, we are against food terrorism, we mensurate etc.
    1
  6. Marwaris are also hate hindus and spread food terroism, what about that?
    1
  7. Here comes a bania.
    1
  8. Too much expectation from Brahmavadi.
    1
  9. Okay and for what?
    1
  10. Why Brahmavad is not seen as issue for you but Islamization?
    1
  11. Nope. The solution remained the same destroy Brahmavad by eating beef.
    1
  12. Bangladesh would have got the independence irrespective of India. Muslim and Brahmins appeasement is not secularism. Both the countries are third world. Nope it is the food terrorism that has engulfed India.
    1
  13. okay. Hindus get targeted by Brahmavadi also in Gujarat.
    1
  14. And who is a Hindu? And who will eat beef then? That is only possible if bengali hindu start having beef or stop consuming cow's milk.
    1
  15. Because there is something called national security.
    1
  16. Vishwaguru in what?
    1
  17. How long beef eating hindus will remain pacifist?
    1
  18. When subcontinent was stablized.
    1
  19. No hindutva growing in India. What is growing is Brahmavad? And that is internal to India. Giving citizenship to people those who migrate to India due to partition is anti-Muslim - great. So you are saying that Bangladeshi people want to join India and return all the properties back to non-Muslims who migrate due to partition, whom you are trying to make food - yourself or Indians?
    1
  20. So? Same is with Kashmiri Muslims. But same is with non-Brahmins who support Brahmavad.
    1
  21. Bangladesh indicators are still better. Why Indians are giving those work illegally? Shame for what?
    1
  22. 1. Lately they have become ambassador of food terrorism. 2. Yep, those are called Brahmavadi. That is what internet is controlled in China.
    1
  23. Except war India cannot think about anything else.
    1
  24. There is nothing called Hindutva foreign policy. What is he running called Brahmavad foreign policy?
    1
  25. And who is a Hindu? Same is with Brahmavadi. Do hindus raise voice against food terrorism, nope?
    1
  26. And what is India's interest?
    1
  27. That depends upon how you look at the things. Economically and politically Modi has done a lot, but Modi has failed in social policies, that is stopping food terrorism and promoting beef as a stable diet among Indians. World praises Bangladesh development. From social perspective Rahul is better, so do Akhilesh. Economically wise Rahul is not good. Food terrorism has led to stunting of 30% of Children and another 30% having diabetes.
    1
  28. India was and is also getting money from outside including USA.
    1
  29. And india - a food terrorist country.
    1
  30. Not only Shekhar whole world praises Bangladesh againsy India on its development and women rights. There is no food terrorism in Bangladesh, you can eat beef.
    1
  31. Brahmins sees everyone as enemy.
    1
  32. Why are they in Bangladesh?
    1
  33. Do you consider Brahmavad and food terrorism as a threat?
    1
  34. The question is who was financing it.
    1
  35. Nope - 175. We do not need a Brahmavadi and a food terrorist as a PM. We deserve better.
    1
  36. By that logic India should be defined as a Brahmavdi and a food terrorism country.
    1
  37. Majority not every. But in India also it happened for Brahmavad and over cows.
    1
  38. Yes it is better than India.
    1
  39. Caste system has no relationship with poverty.
    1
  40. By that definition India is a also a Brahmavadi and an Islamic country.
    1
  41. And move where? They will prefer to convert rather than move.
    1
  42. It is not a threat, it is a wisdom.
    1
  43. They do not want to stay in a food terrorist country. Bangladeshi Hindus voted three times to stay in East Pakistan than with India due to beef eating from 1946-1947. Before that they voted continuously for 40yrs. Those who do not eat beef are adharma - do you believe that? Their HIndus are not food terrorism but beef eater Heroes like Tagore, Aurbindo. Hindus do not feel safe in India because of Brahmavadi like you.
    1
  44. Beacause of Brahmavad i.e food terrorism.
    1
  45. What about in India?
    1
  46. The who would be eating the cow. Only thing India used to export was beef. It was Brahmins who opposed it.
    1
  47. And what that has to do with India. What about violence on Hindus in India?
    1
  48. Everyone was involved in communal killing and parition. You need to get a brain check for your first statement.
    1