Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "BBC inside airbase where Russia carries out Syria airstrikes - BBC News" video.

  1. +Dhruv Yadav He did nothing wrong, he presented TWO views which is what News organisations are supposed to do. Not trumpet Putin propaganda, which is why people like you dont like the BBC>
    2
  2. +vofidevanpay caracas This is western News, the BBC.
    1
  3. +gino gesmundo He is a reporter, he doesnt need people to like him he gets paid just the same whatever the news.
    1
  4. +Juan Euge Irizarry A smack in the face who like telling everyone the BBC is biased against Russia, the propagandists wont like this one.
    1
  5. +Pinch Hitter I bet he doesnt remember you.
    1
  6. I bet he doesn't remember you.Pinch Hitter
    1
  7. Karl Pershing I will be busy decorating East coast beaches with Russian blood.
    1
  8. +alan bodifa MI5 , dont think so, they are UK "internal security", you cant even get your insults right lol
    1
  9. alan bodifa MI6 have probably recruited a few journalists in their time, the same as any national intelligence  org does, FSB, MOSSAD, etc,  but even if he has been they can see much more on satellites, comms intercepts by GCHQ and ELINT gathering that any well known journo can glean, relax brother, this was just a basic story.
    1
  10. I have a pal who was an aircraft  maintainer in the RAF, we were watching this report together and he said the equipment the Russian maintainers were using seems very very old, so the SU-34s etc seem the main beneficiary of upgrades but it doesnt seem to have been done throughout every section of the airforce?
    1
  11. alan bodifa Yeah for sure, the Russians sure do know how to make do, what puzzles me is why they are not using their Laser guided bombs in Syria, its very very odd. It may be a stockpile level issue or a lack of designation I do not know but cluster bombs and Fragmentation bombs, dumb bombs  aren't going to win an asymmetric war these days. ISIS and the rebels know the Russian sortie pattern by now, they know when raids are incoming, so they just dig in, wait for the booms then come up for air because to be honest, accuracy isn't great with dumb weapons, a near miss inst going to collapse a bunker with a 500 lb`er.
    1
  12. Yes but the problem is the Syria army are a mess, 5 years of civil war has depleted them of armour and man power, even Assad has said this.alan bodifa
    1
  13. Umm no they don`t, the TOW missiles outnumber all Russian tanks on the planet and the TOW is wiping out Syrian armour.alan bodifa
    1
  14. alan bodifa Nonsense lad. Do you think people can conjure up armoured vehicles out of thin air? The Syrians have advanced in only two places, painfully slowly, and guess what? ISIS have moved into the places vacated by some Rebels. You clearly dont realize whats happening on the ground. I suggest you do some reading away from RT.
    1
  15. Russia doesn't have a bottomless pit of foreign currency reserve either .:P alan bodifa
    1
  16. We can talk again when Russia comes to the rescue and expunges ISIS from Syria forever, but umm, we may both be skeletons by the time that happens :P alan bodifa
    1
  17. alan bodifa "An RAF spokesman responded: "In our opinion this letter is factually inaccurate. In layman's terms, it is completely full of holes." Nice try but no cigar, is the Tornado force stretched? You bet, but what I am seeing in your YEAR old article is people complaining about Cheese sandwiches so all I can say is... NEXT.
    1
  18. alan bodifa Again, second article, thanks for the link, if you actually read it, it will tell you why there hasn't been a high Ops tempo in Syria, do you need me to plagiarize some of it on here or are you going to bother reading any of it? "However, this has not happened, partly because both nations, operating under stringent rules to guard against civilian casualties, have largely run out of Syrian targets" What do you want us to do?? Just drop bombs for the hell of it or drop them on civilians, sorry we aint the  Russians. if there are no viable targets, we dont do missions, and right now, all the action is in Iraq around Ramadi, , next up for the Iraqi army is Mosul.  tsk tsk, you will have to bring your A game next time kiddo.
    1
  19. Flatulence is all I see from you pal lol. You wont see civilian deaths on your beloved RT because they aren't allowed to criticize Mother Russia and they never do.alan bodifa
    1
  20. Dhruv Yadav Stop with the silly semantics, get to the point. People across the world think the BBC is losing its objectivity, how do you come to that conclusion? That is just your political view not held up by any facts whatsoever. the BBC is the MOST watched Foreign news service in more countries than any other News organization and its the worlds largest, people watch the BBC and I think this is what probably pisses you off more than anything else, it seems RT are in fact not taking over hey comrade? You are confusing inaccurate reporting with political agenda. ALL News agencies are guilty of inaccuracy, RT is KING of that and it does it purposely. Stop being butthurt just because I dont swallow the same tepid propaganda your Sock Puppet pals at RT swallow, get a fucking life yourself  and take your head out of Putins rectum.
    1
  21. +Mr Drone Idiot, no it isnt. So what part of this report wasnt true?
    1
  22. +Billy Bunter Its public funded not a commercial venture you dumb ass.
    1