Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "CRUX" channel.

  1. Thats what the USA is for.
    1
  2. The IDF has good intel I doubt a launch site lasts more than a single barrage before they have to relocate.
    1
  3.  @WalkOverHotCoal  Yes I do. But I am speaking as myself here. If you think this missile reaches mach 12 sustained including in the terminal phase then intercept will be improbable.However, I do not believe it does based on the donor missile it came from.
    1
  4.  @GwynBleys  I am always surprised at the number of people who think Russia has a Mach 12 capable Iskander without any evidence.
    1
  5. I am confident Kinzhal is within the engagement envelope of both Patriot and SAMP-T. The issue is UKR has none operational and will never have enough launchers to cover all possiblle targets and these weapons can only really cover small areas with any reasonable effectiveness. At this point Russia is simply testing them against the people of Ukraine.
    1
  6.  @yourholeispotato2628  It is a nuclear power so it could, but it`s not very likely.
    1
  7.  @p_akistani1687  I dont believe Imran is that stupid.
    1
  8.  @BeyondOurSolarSystem bullshit.
    1
  9.  @BeyondOurSolarSystem we heard yesterday Kinzhal only flies at 3.5 Mach or less - this is from those same UKR Patriot operators who shot 7 of them down, you can find the article in The Economist. How do you feel now Copelord?
    1
  10. Turns out the Kinzhal only hits 3.5 Mach in its terminal phase. The Economist cited a Ukraine battery operator who was cleared for an interview. There was no information on the terminal phase flight profile but I’d expect that to be predictable.
    1
  11. It turns out the Kinzhal is not the wonder weapon you were lead to believe and is in reality nothing more advanced than a washing machine.
    1
  12. A well flown helicopter is a nightmare for a jet fighter to shoot down.
    1
  13. I bet Putin wishes he had a USN carrier, that way his disastrous war in Ukraine might have gone differently.
    1
  14. remember when Russia lost 50 vehicles trying to cross a river? This is small potatoes compared to that. https://i0.wp.com/cms.sofrep.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FSj5hnNWUAALGMT.jpg?resize=1536%2C1152&ssl=1
    1
  15.  @novak7970  If you are going to throw shade at UKR for losing a few armoured vehicles and one Leo2 in one failed attack, then you cannot ignore Russia losing 50 vehicles in one failed attack right?
    1
  16.  @one_step_sideways  those look like a wish list of future fantasies. We all have them, enjoy yours.
    1
  17.  @one_step_sideways  You are just white noise in the information void.
    1
  18.  @enriquelaroche5370 you wait for it to slow down to supersonic speeds so it can actually hit something it’s aimed at. The old Pershing had to do the same thing in order to use its terminal radar. The Zircons they used against Kyiv were the anti ship versions that have to shed velocity in the terminal phase. I guess right now they are developing versions that don’t do that and follow a ballistic trajectory end to end at Mach 8 with a kinetic payload. Guidance would still have to be world class.
    1