Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "New concerns over radiation released from Russian blast l ABC News" video.

  1. Nothing like Chernobyl, Nick, I must say i`m depressed by the amount of stupid I see on the internet.
    2
  2. terrible whataboutery.
    1
  3.  @Johnmiccael1  If you dont understand the depth of your dumbfuckery today, it will remain a mystery tomorrow.
    1
  4. Nothing you have misquoted dilutes the fact your mission here is deception. As I said originally, whataboutism is the redoubt of the Kremlin Troll. There was a serious accident in Russia, people and villages have been contaminated, I saw iirefutable standard toxi- triage being carried out in the released videos stop trying to trivialise this event t'varich.
    1
  5.  @nick.p5609  Then you cannot blame me.
    1
  6. Its not remotely comparable.
    1
  7.  @Syzygy629  How stupid do you have to be to compare a civilian power reactor explosion with an event you know nothing about?
    1
  8. If they've covered it up that means you don't have a clue what happened. Do you understand that logic?
    1
  9.  @Syzygy629  Cover up is standard proceudre for virtually every military cock up globally.
    1
  10. This comment is underappreciated Rogue.
    1
  11. Apparently, the dose of msv you receive is directly proportional to the level of medal you get from the State. Order of Lenin, toasty, hero of the Soviet Union, burnt to a crisp. Extra points for direct reactor shine.
    1
  12. Black body radiation FTW.
    1
  13. Ah, the kremlin whataboutists are here.
    1
  14. If the levels reduced within hours i`m pretty sure what that missile was carrying. Different isotopes decay at different rates, some within minutes others within hours, more have half lives of centuries. it was probably some sort of experimental fuel, if so, these people are fucking nuts.
    1
  15. Its probably a codename produced by a computer.
    1
  16. It wasnt a nuclear blast it was a release of radiation.
    1
  17. No, it wasn't. Do you understand the difference between a fission product and nuclear fusion?
    1
  18. By the way we don't use just satellites to detect nuclear detonations we use seismometers as well as SBIRS and the DSP constellation, but this wasn't a nuclear explosion and I doubt any IR imaging satellite saw anything since it was on the ground and at a very small scale. If anything an optional satellite would have seen it if tasked to do so in advance.
    1
  19. A fission device detonation and a fusion detonation , i.e. an atomic bomb of the type used in WWII and a hydrogen bomb (fusion) don't produce the same types of energy in the same amounts even given the same yield. An atomic weapon will actually produce a wider spectrum of gamma and X rays than an H bomb because of the number of neutrons produced in each explosion. Only a surprisingly small fraction of the material used in each weapon is actually used up. It's an easy matter to tell the difference between a hydrogen bomb detonation and a fission weapon, they even "sound" different, if you could actually hear them. The CTBT org have lots of monitoring stations dotted around the world, including the use of infrasound monitoring as well as radionuclide detectors and seismometers. You can't hide a nuclear detonation, even if you do it inside a mountain, the byproducts will get out. The USAF also has WC -135s for air sampling. This isn't just a bad day for the population of the peninsula it's a bad day for Russian military aspirations because NATO analysis will reveal exactly what they have been doing and how, Christmas has come early for the DIA...
    1