Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "The New York Times" channel.

  1.  @loymeetsworld  He got it right, what his model did not predict was the Republicans stealing the election via a recount.
    1
  2.  @chaosXP3RT  No, stop making threats you cant carry out.
    1
  3. The shoot down was intentional but the target ID was not.
    1
  4. elvin l. They engaged a target mistakenly, there is no way they would have if they knew it was an airliner. A 737 is a relatively small aircraft, say compared to a 767. For all we know they could have been ordered to engage a track by somebody else up the chain of command.
    1
  5. They weren’t heat seekers. TOR missiles use radar command guidance. When you look at a TOR M1 unit you will see two radars, the smaller one providing the guidance channels, the big one doing volume search.
    1
  6. Maybe because they are two different aircraft that hit the ground at different angles and velocities, had different mass and the ground isn’t the same. Also add flight 93 was intact on impact, this aircraft was not.
    1
  7. Not likely, the safeguards over who controls nuclear weapons release are usually immense.
    1
  8. ADSB was showing a transponder signal right up to the first missile impact. That’s why the signal was lost.
    1
  9. artemis lwof that was another incident you can’t conflate events like that it’s too simplistic. By the way you are wrong about the timing.
    1
  10.  @artemislwof9264  I was paid to be an expert for 22 years. The transponder timing are open source it just takes a bit of research mate.
    1
  11. Yes, but humans can ignore them.
    1