Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "Daily Mail" channel.

  1.  @mpkid5  So what about the videos of Bradleys recovered inside of buildings what do you make of those videos Vatnik?
    1
  2.  @mpkid5  As Lloyd Austin has said, Russian sources show the same footgae and photos time and time again. If an IFV is burnt out it is not recoverable, but blast damage or punctured armour can be repaired, thrown tracks can be repaired etc etc. If not, replacemenst are being furnished. The US has something like 6,000 Bradleys, and lets not pretend Russia has an endless supply of equipment.
    1
  3. Well, you voted for it dumbo.
    1
  4. Where is the evidence of them all hitting the ground? Do Kinzhals “vanish” in thin air,
    1
  5. Well you keep saying you’ve destroyed the Patriots but we still keep seeing Patriot launches. Make up your mind.
    1
  6.  @jama7538  tanks r us, how many do you need?
    1
  7. No, there were other ballistic missiles too and cruise missiles. The rate of fire from that Patriot battery was impressive. I’d love to see S-400 do that using cold launch.
    1
  8. It’s Kyiv, silly Botnik.
    1
  9. What’s your experience in missile engineering or weapons employment?
    1
  10. Another no channel content BOT.
    1
  11. You only saw one ground impact - which means only one Russian weapon hit the ground. What happened to the other Russian missiles?
    1
  12. Another no channel content BOT.
    1
  13.  @Наденька-в4е  Nonsense, those Sat photos show nothing that can be positively identified as any prior Patriot battery components.
    1
  14.  @BannedByMe  It is because you are carefully selecting a time period to make a point that is totally without meaning, stocks go up and down naturally, investors look at long term trends not snapshots. Any price fluctuations are not affected by equipment performance in the field, if that were the case, Russian defence manufacturers would have all gone bankrupt .
    1
  15.  @BannedByMe  You cannot prove any Patriot was destroyed and the pictures show no such thing, to be honest you should be ashamed or maybe you are just naive.
    1
  16.  @BannedByMe  Now The Economist has gotten access to a UKR Patriot operator for an article, who stated Kinzhal was only capable of 30% of the velocity claimed by the Russians. Now it all makes perfect sense.
    1
  17. Yawn.
    1
  18.  @Britlurker says who?
    1
  19. These are the adults, Leavers are the petulent children.
    1
  20. Shut up.
    1
  21. Where are the impacts from all of the other Russian Kinzhals? Did they miss the city or where they shot down. I think you know the answer.
    1
  22. No MSE. Only CRI.
    1
  23. That was debris, and you’ll notice there was only one. Where are all of the other Russian missiles did they vanish into thin air?
    1
  24. You don’t know what that was so you’re guessing. Is that right.
    1
  25. Article 50 has already been agreed Einstein.
    1