Comments by "romanmir01" (@romanmir01) on "Scott Walker’s Trickle Down Experiment Is Crippling Wisconsin Economy" video.

  1. +Xavier Thorn right, so there was less theft and redistribution. What USA needs is to get rid of all income and wealth theft and redistribution. It needs to get rid of government oppression, laws and regulations in business if it wants to see jobs in the country.
    1
  2. +Xavier Thorn wrong, what I am saying is that without full dismantlement of government theft, redistribution, regulation and inflation USA will not see any prosperity. Full de-governmentazation needs to happen (and will happen) before USA economy will be rebuilt.
    1
  3. +hustler3of4culture3 no, I think you will find an idiot by staring in the mirror instead, not at my comments.
    1
  4. +Xavier Thorn wrong, nobody is doing what I am saying. nobody removes government from business, from money, from education, from healthcare, from utilities, even from defence. Nobody is doing it, but it will happen once the US bonds and the dollar collapse (and they will). There will be the "Great Restructuring" (I coined the term) and it will lead to the solution.
    1
  5. nobody should have to pay for anybody else's life, education, health, food, housing, entertainment, anything at all under the barrel of a government gun. I see Scott Walker as a person standing up for individual liberty. He has my vote.
    1
  6. +sh09un1 facts are these: government is oppression, used to steal and redistribute.
    1
  7. +multidinero government shouldn't be in any business, including health care or education or housing or any sort of taxing of profits with the intent to buy votes via any sort of redistribution. It is immoral and horrible economics.
    1
  8. +hustler3of4culture3 at least I know how to use this forum without reposting the same comment 3 times in a row, moron.
    1
  9. The only thing that works is freedom. Freedom from government, freedom from government oppression. Tax cuts have to be matched by spending cuts, by government cuts, by welfare system cuts.
    1
  10. +egonkirchof the only oppression is that, which is done under the guise of 'legitimacy' of a government. what is 'corporate oppression'? if not for a government oppression there is no such thing. A corporation cannot legitimately oppress you if it is not provided power by some law.
    1
  11. +Jeffrey Xu somalia is full of government, you ignorant asswipe.
    1
  12. +egonkirchof suing is oppression now? Ha! I see you don't understand the meaning of the word.
    1
  13. +egonkirchof competing is oppression now? Ha! I see you don't understand the meaning of the word at all. Taking down competition by using government connections is oppression because government is oppression. Destroying competition by competing without government involvement is not oppression unless you are some psycho
    1
  14. +egonkirchof not even close. I do run a small business and I help to outsource some IT and some trucking related jobs to other places, where there is much less government involvement in business.
    1
  15. +egonkirchof children work when their parents cannot feed them and this collectivism ensures that parents will not be able to feed their kids. It is free market that created the prosperity needed to prevent parents from requiring their children to work so that the family doesn't starve. Collectivism causes thisassive poverty, it is more obvious in some places before others (China before 1970s, Venezuela today, etc.). USA will see the children work again of-course once the US bonds and the dollar collapse. Then free market will return, as the government will shrink, and the prosperity of the free market eventually will let the parents feed their kids without kids labouring.
    1
  16. So the experiment worked just fine, the tax cuts followed by spending and investment, of-course the world is global and much of the spending and investment went out of Wisconsin. Obviously it worked, it absolutely and clearly worked. Nobody should have a single penny of their income stolen from them by any government. Not a penny should be redistributed from anybody to anybody via government oppression.
    1
  17. +Skaarphy because it is immoral and bad economics. because it is oppressive, it is horrible morality, it is theft and it grows government power rather than allowing freedom. Because it creates systems of oppression that are a must if some will have their money stolen so tha t somebody's vote can be bought with the proceeds.
    1
  18. +Haedrix nonsense. government exists to oppress, no other reason. it oppresses the individual and its power to oppress attracts people who use that power for their purposes. nothing you mentioned should ever be in the hands of any government, including roads, fire, police, education, health. AFAIC at this point, not even border security. everything is a private concern. setting up a government is creating systems of oppression of an individual and it is as horribly immoral as it is economically stupid.
    1
  19. +Adronias money is made by production. to extrapolate that to your little comment over there is to equate production to theft, which is quite Orwellian of you.
    1
  20. +wildbattlechicken it worked for those people living in Wisconsin, who had less of their money stolen from them. It worked for the overall global economy. I want to see a person like Scott everywhere, in every state, in every city, in every government, standing up for freedom from government oppression, theft and redistribution.
    1
  21. +Adronias whether you like my argument doesn't matter to me, I know that freedom from government is unpopular among those, who want government to steal and redistribute. What matters is that Scott's policies must be used everywhere
    1
  22. +Euan LP what are you talking about? money for schools, health care, roads, utilities, police, fire, everything comes from individual users, which is why all of these things need to be totally private. A school is not in any way different from any other business.
    1
  23. +Skaarphy schools are a business, like any other business when done privately it offers different products at different price points. there shouldn't be any taxes and any subsidies to any schools, schools would serve people just fine, not different from food stores and everybody shops there, rich and poor. Ditto for healthcare. Police, fire, any utilities are businesses and without government would be provided by multiple competing private firms. Insurance is how people would pay for police and fire.
    1
  24. +Haedrix nonsense, profit motive is the most moral incentive to provide any product or service. Government is immoral by definition because it is built upon a system of oppression - guns.
    1