Comments by "romanmir01" (@romanmir01) on "The Monsanto Protection Act's Bought Republican" video.

  1. No, they will not! However you are attacking 'happy meal' for no reason at all, clearly you don't understand supply chain management, there will be no significant difference in 'happy meal' contents between restaurants and even between time frames the differences will be inconsequential. Tell me something, do you actually believe that FDA tests EVERY SINGLE HAPPY MEAL or something to that effect? Do YOU live in the real world? Here is the truth: most people don't care either way.
    1
  2. You don't get what I am saying. IF (and it's a big IF) there is a market NEED to spend scarce resources on labelling and certifying products THEN YOU (or anybody) can start a company doing exactly that You can make money in this by allowing the market to be as efficient as it wants. There are people WHO DO NOT CARE if they eat rat burgers or whatever. There are companies who will not want to certify with anybody and keep lowest price There are companies that will want a seal of approval
    1
  3. I don't want gov't coming to people and telling them what they can and cannot do on THEIR private property. Private property rights are supposed to be protected, that's the real individual right - to own and operate private property in any way they want. However if they destroy OTHER property in process that does NOT belong to them, then it's an issue that must be investigated and punished, etc.
    1
  4. Again: if somebody does NOT care about the contents of their food and all they care about is it being cheap, I do NOT see how that is ANY of my business and ANY of my responsibility at all to pay taxes to run a huge gov't that would do any of this. I want people to do their own thinking, whether they do it or not is none of my business and none of my concern.
    1
  5. How about government should NOT BE ALLOWED TO REGULATE ANY BUSINESS AT ALL? Which would incidentally also be the Constitutional way to run a government? Gov't is not allowed to regulate business, only to regulate an act of interstate commerce (actual transactions). How about allowing people to make their own decisions and buy or not buy based on labelling of products? Noooo, people are too dumb to make their own decisions, that's the liberal way.
    1
  6. As to trying to "take money out of politics", you fucking idiots, good luck. That can never happen. Money will change hands, it doesn't matter how. Now you can at least SEE it, the way you are proposing to do it will completely take it under the table. You won't SEE the money coming, so there will be MORE money changing hands, not less. The only way to fix this problem is take POWER out of hands of gov't officials that they shouldn't have Constitutionally and let the market actually work.
    1
  7. You can even sell services to concerned INDIVIDUAL buyers to do testing of whatever products that THEY are interested in testing! You can do DNA sequencing, chem tests, hormone tests, tests for bacteria, virus, spores, etc.etc. for the concerned individuals. Again, notice that as an economy of scale it will be cheaper for you to do these tests than for individual customers in the market, so you can provide these services cheap enough, and again, NO TAXES and NO GOV'T REGULATIONS are required
    1
  8. As to private property and destruction of it: I do not care what anybody does to THEIR private property! I really do not care what anybody does to THEIR private property! As long as they are able to contain their destruction to THEIR private property and not affect MY private property it doesn't bother me at all if they figure that any kind of 'destruction' of private property will give them a better return on that investment than not destroying it in the long term.
    1
  9. So you can enter an agreement with a company that you certify its products and if you do a good job, you'll be profitable. By doing a "good job" I mean testing their products off the shelves, doing DNA sequencing and various chemical tests, whatever needs to be done You can sell your certificates and if you are an honest rating agency, you'll establish reputation If you SUCK and/or cost too much, you'll face competition Notice how NONE OF THIS required any gov't involvement and waste of money
    1