Comments by "D. San" (@DSan-kl2yc) on "African leaders meet with Zelenskyy, Putin to push for peace | DW News" video.

 @ahmadahmed214 did you mistyped, Ukraine was the aggressed. And Russia has been messing with them since 2014
3
 @MrThartofwar how can Russia start a war, invade land, and then you're pretending it's being invaded. It doesn't make sense. Russia passed Ukraine's borders and occupied their territory
3
@salam14111 you're not on Ukraine's side because you're saying nonsense. Ukraine didn't hate Russia. The fact you're saying this shows what insane bias you have. Russia was interfering and invading Ukraine. If they dislike the country now, it's because Russia kept giving them reasons to. And it wouldn't matter anyway since it's for protection, against something like this war. Blaming the US makes no sense in this circumstance.
3
 @rayngabo no there isn't. Even the people who favored Russia, a minority, didn't say anything about getting invaded and bombed, or ceding their country.
2
 @DemosBrutus Russia is making a problem out of Ukraine for no reason other than ego. Some say mineral wealth too
2
 @milanuhliar8315 US and NATO aren't invading Ukraine. Russia is. Russia should leave.
2
 @olivka7560 not the donbas. The Junta that took over and dominated over people. Fighting a group trying to take over, working for another country makes sense. Any country would do that.
2
 @gamerisland2729 Russia's. Mental gymnastics isn't appropriate here. Wait for the Olympics or something.
2
 @castanheira99 NATO isn't invading Ukraine.. wut
2
 @milanuhliar8315 how are you justifying the Russians being in Ukraine I wonder
2
 @davlid100 this doesn't make sense. Countries border Russia. You want those countries to get out? Russia is pursuing war.
2
 @mdumisenihlophe4001 No it can't...
1
@bibhuduttamisra6065 they're the same location or closer! The ethics of the action from Russia's side doesn't matter. It's wrong. They're in the wrong. Whatever feelings of ownership they have over Ukraine are wrong too. Another difference with the Cuban missle crisis you like to bring up, other than how they were nuclear missiles, was that it was actually happening. Russia attacked based on an idea that only came about again because they had already attacked. The first attacks were because Ukraine was looking to make a deal with the EU, not NATO. There's no defense of Russia here.
1
 @freddawarren3502 It wasn't. It was 3-4 times weaker. Russia shouldn't be a threat to Ukraine.
1
 @mingwu5659 whether we support it.or not, they have bases. But NATO is not a foreign state. But an alliance, a pact that country's join.
1
@ahmedakhan1 Russia refused to follow Minsk. It owns up to that at times. It didn't consider itself party to it. It also didn't or not enough, tell it's proxies to follow it. Because it obviously wanted them there to destabilize Ukraine, or have an excuse to invade, which it did.
1
 @raffiartinian4527 so you don't have an opinion. So why even comment.
1
 @krishnaisaga4817 you just said India rejected a proposal. I call bs but your own story proves no one is forced. People go to NATO to join.
1
 @ahmedakhan1 good thing the US didn't overthrow the Ukranian government in 2014. It stayed intact except the parts that Russia invaded or overthrew via proxies and agents.
1
@MrThartofwar BS. .let Russia pull out under a promise of a real referendum in a years time for donbas, and 9 years for Crimea. Let Russia have a referendum led by UN peace keepers in Chechnya. The truth is Russia invaded territory. And is trying to claim it by force. And it's trying to justify that force the way all dictators do.
1
@qaz120120 Ukraine is in Ukraine. Russia is in Ukraine illegally. Ukraine can let in anyone they want. The west isn't in Ukraine. Ukraine's values were moving to align with the rest of Europe. That pissed Russia off because they hate democratic countries, and they hate not having control over Ukraine.
1
@qaz120120 Russia doesn't think so, they invaded twice(3times actually) and keep claiming more territory. That was a military junta backed by Russia to give Russia those lands and destabilize Ukraine.
1
@dark_master_Makei he didn't illegal come into power. He very much legally came to power. Just because there was no procedure doesn't mean it's illegal. Just means they had to make it. One president vacated the office, when he has promised to resign. Then they appointed someone. Then they had elections. Like the commenter said, if it was a coup, it was one that ended immediately. But it wasn't a coup, because it was the Ukraine government that appointed an intermediate president. The government was not couped.
1
 @DemosBrutus there's no should. NATO wasn't formed with a single goal in the first place. And Russia has it's csto.
1
 @DemosBrutus Russia decided to be against everyone because it's crazy. NATO, Europe, people were trying to work with Russia.
1
 @qaz120120 no one gets to have it. Ukraine is making ota choices. Russia is being an aggressive invader, trying to steal land.
1
@dark_master_Makei the US didn't intervene. There was no coup. No one overthrew the government. Except for the Russian organized Junta in parts of the donbas. But that overthrow by Russia is okay for you.
1
@qaz120120 that is not only a lie, but it doesn't make sense. 1) why would they, there was no coup. Ukranians didn't want something. Trying to blame the US is nonsensical coping by Russia. 2)There was no coup. The government was not taken over but remained in power. Elections were held. 3) Russia had interfered with their president before the protests. 4) Russia invaded Crimea 5) Russia staged a coup. See how Russia does something and blames the West. It projects it's actions. The people in the east didn't try to defend themselves. Russia was supporting right wing groups for years to destabilize the country. These groups overthrew the civil government and ruled by force of arms, supplied by Russia. With Russian agents, or appointed people ECT. The US or any other country(except Russia in some small regions) didn't gain control or even try to gain, control of the Ukrainian government or people. So how can you say it took control? It didn't. The Ukranian government didn't change, it always has control. It lost some control because of Russia's destabilization and because of irs invasions during that time. So this idea of a western government gaining control is nonsense. There was no military or agents or anything(except from Russia). And Ukraine stayed in control.
1
The incredulous "what do they want from me" is ridiculous. I think its time african leaders realize Putin is like a dictator or warlord. He's not serious about it.
1
@garys6135 obviously they can. Minus some issues, they'd enjoy more freedom and a more robust democracy than under Putin. The idea that they can't is hogwash. There were other regions with flare-ups that calmed down and things were fine. Only Russia's actions have caused perpetual war.
1