Comments by "MontanaMountainMen" (@montanamountainmen6104) on "Shocking Supreme Court Ruling Dismantles Effective Gun Control Law" video.

2A wins again. Tax money to fund private schools. NC voter ID upheld. Seems progressives/ dems are getting a taste of whats to come...........About damn time.
6
Nope, why mad you didn't get your way?
4
Well what part of shall not be infringed do you know compute?
4
👍, but will they...🤔
3
Yeah you can own a tank, cannon, jet, bazooka, etc all legal.....Damn isn't the US great!
3
I've noticed that too, wonder why, lol.
3
Its illegal to carry in Federal buildings and court houses even the post office.....Anyways has been in the last 75 years....I've carried concealed since 1991, gee no one knew and no one was harmed fathom that.
3
Ok Ana , try this under NY law you must show a reason to carry. You apply, your reason, " I'm a progressive that bashes the US .I need a firearm to protect myself". Try that one on the " reason for carry." I may not agree with your political progressive bullshit, but you have rights . You don't have to own a gun but if you desire you need no " Special reason."
3
Yep, well supplied . That was the meaning in 1776.
2
And you legally can, isn't that great.
2
@toddmorningstar4206 A person has the right to self protection its a right not a priviledge...........
2
🎯
1
SCOTUS ruled in 2008 Heller vs DC that a state can not deny a person the right to own, carry or transport firearms.....The case was settled then, you are not overly bright huh.........
1
@LawrenceJohnYoung I know my rights and your nod or permission to exercise those rights are not needed.
1
🎯
1
@origamikami3486 By nut jobs seeking attention, yeah, stop giving it to them and punish them.........
1
@ThePento5 "Regulated "in 1776 meant well kept and supplied.........Cheers Tory.
1
@MHiggins States can regulate sale and tax but not infringe on ones right to own or carry.........
1