Comments by "KGS" (@kgs2280) on "A Glimpse Into Dark World GOP Wants For Women?" video.
-
44
-
27
-
21
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
12
-
12
-
10
-
9
-
7
-
6
-
@dominicfucinari1942 I’m not familiar with Randall Terry (who is he?), but Mitt Romney and a congressman from, I believe, Ohio formed a two-man “smashing campaign” against adding the ERA because of a 10-year deadline, which had been added regarding the state’s ratifications, but it was not part of the main text of the amendment, just an add-on to pull out and use against it later if they could, just like in a case like this. And, as I stated, it’s clearly written in the Constitution that once the 38th state has ratified, Congress has NOTHING to do with it anymore, and the Amendment is supposed to go directly into the Constitution, end of story. Before that, trump called Bill Barr to tell him he didn’t want it put in (of course!), and it seems Bill Barr called Mitt Romney, and he and the other Congressman killed it. If I remember correctly, Joe Biden was also there, and I think it was also to help kill it. After that, a women’s group (Equal Means Equal) took it to the Supreme Court, and, of course they also shot it down, on the basis that the group didn’t have “standing”, which I don’t understand. I know how standing works because I looked it up, and it’s when someone brings a suit that really isn’t in the personal interest of the person or persons bringing the suit. But I’ve never had anybody explain to me how a group of women which exists solely to try to get the ERA put into the Constitution are not personally affected by getting it in there! As individual women they will be personally affected by that action, and as a group for that purpose they will be personally affected. Can you explain that to me? But this just shows how much they do not want women to have equal rights. Period.
5
-
5
-
1
-
1
-
1