Comments by "sharper68" (@sharper68) on "REAL Liberals Do Exist And We Don’t Agree With Them" video.

bunklypeppz Please cite your specific concerns with the legislation or how it impacts men negatively when if fact it would apply to everyone equally. If you are honest concerned about actual elements in the bill please share them.
1
bunklypeppz "Another is the Lily Ledbetter act which was supposedly about "equality for women," but all that it fucking does is extend the statute of limitations on how long after leaving a job, an individual could sue for pay disparity." There is no down side to this, what it really does is give the tools to enforce the existing law and hold employers to the standard that already exists. It gives employees the ability to determine if they are in fact being cheated and a path to seek fair remuneration. A law like this is the ONLY way existing protections can be enforced and there no downside if the issue is as non existent as you clowns pretend it is. Currently the one can only seek compensation from the time you prove you have been treated unfairly and there is no provision to for anyone to do so. To fight this law is to protect those who have unfairly paid their workers, full stop. That you want to yank food out of the mouths of working families is not a principled position and is repulsive on its face as you support unfair pay standards while pretending they do not exist. To say there is not practical application is nonsense on the face. To fight this law is not about equity but to be in the chamber of commerce pocket and hurts working families.
1
bunklypeppz Explain why extending the statute of limitations for a law some companies have been breaking for decades is a bad thing? Besides that is not all it does it gives employees the tools to verify they are not being ripped of and the employer is not breaking the law. I need you to explain that why unless you are a shill for the Chamber of commerce you would oppose fair treatment for people who have been robbed of fair remuneration is something to be ignored. Lilly proved they can not be enforced and she had and open and shut case where she was screwed specifically because the issues I mention were not in place. I think all workers should be paid fairly and if we have laws in place to protect them they should be enforceable and binding back to when the offense occurred. Employers knew they were breaking the law I see no reason to cut them slack when they had been robbing their workers for a long time. Please explain the political justification for this law and why you would oppose it. Your position is wholly in service to the business who robbed their workers. This is political, political in the sense those who oppose it have been bought off to do so.
1