Comments by "Henbot" (@Henbot) on "Twitter Bans Neo-Nazi Account" video.

  1. No they dont, hate and inciting hate isn't allowed for Muslims and shouldn't be allowed for Neo Nazis. Whom are no better than jihadists and pure hatred. They need to be crippled from being able to mobilize by being able to reach their followers and forced into tiny groups.
    1
  2. With Jihadists and Nazis/Fascists it is more about hindering Broadcasting then hindering free Speech. They dont speak truths only emotive lies of hate. A TV channel with neo nazi's will reach more people than some website only right wing people know about. Twitter is hugely open, allows mobilization and unhindered broadcasting. By removing them from Twitter, they still will be able to speak their hatred. Just not as openly and as easily as via Twitter.
    1
  3. I do agree tbh. Difference between just pure hate and speech.
    1
  4. Democracy doesnt need Neo Nazis and pure embodiments of hatred and violence. Just incorrect to imply they aint fascists, yes they are. That sounds like neo nazi defending. They believe in Nazism and THAT was fascism. It is fascist ideology. That has no place in a modern society and if Muslim Jihadists are banned from spouting anti west views so should Neo Nazis, they are just the same undiluted hatred. Difference between free speech and free opinion, and pure hatred.
    1
  5. No it fucking isnt. Neo Nazi's are pure hate, they have no place in modern society and can go fuck themselves. Them talking about assault is hate speech and inciting to hate and should not be allowed. Muslim get arrested for inciting hate on the west, total hypocrisy Neo Nazis dont. Neo Nazi's can shut the fuck up and the whole libertarian approach is bull, Neo Nazi's are not typical right wing ideology its pure hatred. I think anyone that is a decent human being doesnt think like neo nazi.
    1