Comments by "Viceral Man" (@viceralman8450) on "Russian attack helicopter is blown out of the sky by Ukrainian forces" video.

  1.  @rhamdhani2600  S-300 SAM in terminal fase.
    5
  2.  @starcitizen890j5  No its was a S-300, Javelin can't engage targets at such altitude. As it has a limited use against air targets.
    3
  3. S-300 SAM
    2
  4. SAM actually.
    2
  5. S-300 SAm system. Spot on
    2
  6.  @下田洋介-w4z  S-300 SAM, Javelin cannot engage helicopters that high on the sky.
    2
  7. S-300 Sam it has a warhead of 150 kilos.
    2
  8. s 300 sam
    2
  9. S 300 SAM.
    2
  10. Ka-52 and downed by a s-300
    2
  11. S-300 SAM system.
    2
  12. Nope S-300. .....
    2
  13. Both are 200.
    1
  14. yes.
    1
  15. S-300 SAM system.
    1
  16. No, S- 300 SAM.
    1
  17. S-300.....
    1
  18. S-300 SAM ....
    1
  19. S-300 SAM
    1
  20. S-300.
    1
  21. Si fue derribado por un s-300 la trayectoria se debe que el misil estaba alcanzando su rango máximo por lo que debía planear hasta el objetivo.
    1
  22. Yep a s-300
    1
  23. It was hit by a S-300 SAM , ATGMs cannot engage target as such altitude.
    1
  24.  @magnarez  They can't, they aren't designed for that why MANPADs ans SAMs exist. It was a fragmentation warhead of a S-300 which is pretty big over 150 kilos of HE. They do as the warhead detonates in cone like pattern.-,.................... You clearly have no clue.....
    1
  25. Sure pal, sources: your arse. 🤣🤣
    1
  26.  @vigilantdr.dolittle  Sure Mrs BS.
    1
  27. S-300 surface to air missile.
    1
  28. S-300. SAM
    1
  29. lol, too much vodka again?
    1
  30. S-300 SAM SYSTEM.
    1
  31. No, both Pilots KIA.
    1
  32. SAMs that´s too big to by a MANPAD
    1
  33. No, soviet made S-300..
    1
  34. S-300 SAM-
    1
  35.  @SCPKing1835  The S-300 could hit it from more than 80 kilometers away so, no need.
    1
  36.  @herringfly  1| million probably less as its soviet to destroy a 20 million helicopter, that's a complete bargain to be honest.
    1
  37. S-300
    1
  38. They have but the dead can’t active them.
    1
  39. S-300 SAM, other people commenting has no clue whatsoever.
    1
  40. s-300
    1
  41. S-300 startreak is too small to be seen on the video at such distance.
    1
  42. Both pilots were KIA
    1
  43. Its difficult to eject is you are already dead.
    1
  44. It's a soviet made SAM, no western money was used.
    1
  45. S-300 SAM.....
    1
  46. S-300 SAM system .
    1
  47. Where are NATO forces?
    1
  48.  @flicmartin9305  Sure Ivan proof?
    1
  49. S-300 SAM...
    1
  50. It's a S-300 SAM
    1
  51. S-300 soviet SAM.
    1
  52. Gonna cry Ivan ?🤣🤣
    1
  53.  @matty_mcmattface  Yeah of Russian charges against fortified position WW1 style yes, and the piles of Wagnerites lifeless on the fields as well.
    1
  54. S-300 SAM.-.
    1
  55. Yes, that a S-300 SAM.
    1
  56. Death pilots can activate anything so.
    1
  57. Laugh to not cry Ivan?
    1
  58. Correct S-300 SAM system.
    1
  59. S-300
    1
  60. S-300..
    1
  61. Nope a soviet made, Ukrainian operated S-300.
    1
  62. yes a
    1
  63. That was a SAM.
    1
  64. S-300 SAM...
    1
  65. S-300 Sam system.....
    1
  66. SAMs are radar guided so flares are useless.
    1
  67.  @charles6952  They are guided by radar, those how use heat signature are the much smaller MANPADs, and SAMs have counter counter measures like changing homing mode, homing into jammers and passive radar, change from the onboard radar to the main battery radar etc. And a S-300 missile can reach speed of up to Mach 6.
    1
  68.  @charles6952  And I almost forgot the Sparrow is not a SAM but a medium range ATA missile, true SAMs are for example the PAC-1, 2 and 3 from Patriot system.
    1
  69. At the beginning of WW2, they in late 1943 the proximity fuse was invented ans only a dozen shoots were needed to wring don't an enemy plain........
    1
  70. S-300 SAM is huge not a MANPAD for sure.
    1
  71. S-300 they are design to explode near the target not at contact.
    1
  72. S-300
    1
  73. SAm.
    1
  74. Ambos pilotos pasaron a mejor vida.
    1
  75. S-300 is the author of the art piece.
    1
  76. S-300 surface to air missile.
    1
  77. Y en el mismo discurso de Von Der Leyen se menciona que rusia ha sufrido 300.000 bajas peros eso no se menciona, verdad?
    1
  78. No, both were KIA.
    1
  79. Tell that to Putin.
    1
  80.  @KarelZweefvlieger  Putin's mother is death, I think.
    1
  81. S-300 SAM--
    1
  82. Where are NATO troops?
    1
  83.  @robotinthebrain  Sure any evidence to support your claims?
    1
  84. correct
    1
  85. That's a SAM.
    1
  86.  @lawlessgecko269  Its a S-300 SAM. Big boom.
    1
  87.  @lawlessgecko269  Size os the missile plus the size of the explosion NSAMS missiles are way smaller so their warhead is much smaller.
    1
  88. No it detonated near it as any anti air missile.
    1
  89. Lol cry harder Ivan. 🤣🤣
    1
  90. It was a SAM. S-300...
    1
  91. Pilots KIA.
    1
  92. yes
    1
  93.  @holdernewtshesrearin5471  Sure, anyway hoe cares the thing is completely destroyed. 🤣🤣
    1
  94.  @holdernewtshesrearin5471  Half of it pretty sure yes, the rest was blown off, sure buddy that's why it was wreck form the sky. lol
    1
  95. Its form this week, cope Ivan.
    1
  96. S-300 SAM..
    1
  97. S-300 actually...
    1
  98. S-300 SAM----
    1
  99.  @redeemerpilot9338  Unless it's reaching its maximum distance in that case the missile will glide to target, as the engine has burned all the fuel, that why it comes from above. Like in this case. Plus, IRIS-t missile is tiny only 2.93 meters so at that distance would look much smaller than this missile that look huge despite the distance suggesting is pretty big just as a S-300 missile with 7 meters of length.
    1
  100. Gonna cry Ivan?
    1
  101.  @myers5159  For your fallen comarades?
    1
  102. S-300 SAM system.
    1
  103.  @holdernewtshesrearin5471  Instant that's why the tail split form the body, right? plus, both pilots are KIA.
    1
  104. The tail was completely cut off what are you talking about?
    1
  105. Best in the world is the US Army, the UAF are the best in Ukraine.
    1
  106.  @badcholesterol  They don't even reach the toes of the US army or the PLA speaking, frankly. Not even the best in Eastern Europe.
    1
  107.  @sunnysied713  Both of you are wrong as it is an AA missile it has a proximity fuse, so it detects how close the target it and detonates close to shower it with shrapnel and that destroy the aircraft.
    1
  108. Both KIA.
    1
  109. S-300 SAM----
    1
  110. Nobody has air superiority in Ukraine.
    1
  111. S-300 SAM --
    1
  112.  @Ed-rt9qt  That's the effect of a 150-kilo fragmentation warhead.
    1
  113. S-300….
    1
  114. S-300 soviet SAM.
    1
  115. lol how dense are you? Zelensky has stated multiple time they are open to negotiations under two conditions, number one that Russia terminates all hostilities ans number two the retreat of all russian troops of the international recognized borders of Ukraine, Putin can terminate this any day he wants by leaving and no missile would have landed in Poland if the Russians weren't shooting those in the first place.
    1
  116.  @wor53lg50  Looks almost as big as the ka-52 the S-300 missile length is 7 meters, so this was a S-300 as it is kite big.
    1
  117. Both are KIA.
    1
  118.  @ajaypawar8315  It came from the ground to it and boom.
    1
  119. No, S-300 SAM ----
    1
  120. Actually S-300......
    1