Comments by "agon noga" (@agonnoga6100) on "'Sinic' civilization will join hands with Islamic one to fight Western world: CDS Bipin Rawat" video.

Chinese never got along with Islamic civilization as racially, culturally and their values are very different. China is close to Pakistan only to act as a counterweight against India.
41
@shekharguptafanclub4120 Who told you Chinese and Indian civilization didn't attack one another?? Are you aware North East was under Chinese and Burmese occupation from 1200 to 1800 AD?? Today's Assam used to be known as Kamrupa whose natives were Bengalis. Chinese Ahoms from Yunnan invaded Bengali Kamrupa in circa 1200 AD and renamed it to Oxom or Axom after themselves. Chinese occupied Axom was invaded and occupied by the Burmese from 1400 AD to 1800 AD when British invaded and annexed Burma with British India. This is how after 600 years of Chinese and Burmese occupation, Kamrupa aka Assam aka North East returned to India but with majority ethnic Chinese and Burmese population. When the British separated Burma from India in 1937, they retained undivided Assam with India but these places now had majority ethnic Chinese and Burmese population who have never accepted themselves as Indians. This is why these people have been taking help from China and Burma to separate from India right from 1947. This is why the government of India has hidden the history of North East and declared ethnic Chinese and Burmese as indigenous Indian tribals to appease them and Bengalis who are the real natives of North East as settlers or illegal immigrants in their own ancestral lands. India and Indians played a huge role in China's century of humiliation where the British used troops from India to cow down the Chinese and forcibly sold them opium grown in British India for silver, tea, silk and other precious commodities. Much of the old Marwari, Parsi, Gujarati business houses made their fortune through the opium trade under the patronage of the British in return for support of their kings of Rajputana Gujarat towards British occupation of British India of which Rajputana Gujarat were never a part of. You will not get to read this in any history book.
7
@shekharguptafanclub4120 I am not going to debate with what you have touched upon except the fact that today's China was created by occupying several Asian countries by the Chinese communists just like USSR was created by occupying several republics by the Russian communists. USSR has collapsed but Communist China is propped up by USA and it's allies which includes India with huge trade deficits. Hindu is a Persian name for people living around Sindhu river, whom we call Pakistanis today. So, who's a Hindu when the name itself isn't desi??
3
@shekharguptafanclub4120 actually Vedic civilization used to spread from Afghanistan to Vietnam. Kandahar used to be known as Gandhar from where Gandhari of Mahabharata hailed from. What is completely unknown to us is Indic Malaysia and Indonesia which were known as Srivijaya, Cambodia as Kamboj, Vietnam as Champa ... all this changed after Chinese invasion from 1000 AD just like what happened to India's Kamrupa aka north east after Chinese and Burmese invasion from 1200 AD onwards. You know about Maa Ganga in India. But Mekong river in South East Asia in Chinese is known as Meigonghe which is Maa Gange in sanskrit/Hindi or Maa Gonga in Bengali.
2
@shekharguptafanclub4120 it seems you are not aware that Nepal occupied parts of UP Bihar and was gifted additional parts of UP Bihar by East India Company for its help in putting down the East India Company sepoys from UP Bihar during 1857 sepoy mutiny. This is how birth places of Sita and Buddha ended up in Nepal alongwith a large Hindi ethnic population called the Madhesis who have never been accepted as Nepalis in Nepal. People of Garhwal have Indo Aryan north Indian physical features. Uttarakhand and Himachal were under Nepali occupation for few decades. This is how these places have a large Nepali population. Birds of the same feather flock together. This adage also extends to humans. Racism casteism etc results in when people of different looks mix together.
1
@sureshnaidu201 Ahoms are Dai Chinese just like the Thais who are also not the natives of Thailand but Chinese settlers from southern China. Ahoms didn't invade through Burma but from China. Meitei of Manipur who are also Dai Chinese probably came through Burma. From 1400 to 1800 North East was part of Burma this is how north east ended up with such large austro asiatic and mongoloid population. People like Kukis, Nagas Mizos khasis Tripuris etc are of Burmese origin. From 1200 to 1400 north east was largely under Chinese Ahom occupation. Prior to 1200 AD it was ruled by Bengalis.
1
@sureshnaidu201 you want to say ethnic Chinese are natives of Kamrupa, and Bengalis are foreigners in Kamrupa??
1
@sevenstars4817 Kamrupa aka north east was always a part of India as natives are Bengalis which changed after Ahoms from China invaded and occupied Kamrupa from 1200 AD to 1400 AD. From 1400 AD to 1800 AD North East was part of Burma. 1800 AD the British invaded and annexed Burma with British India. This is how after 600 years of Chinese and Burmese occupation, Kamrupa aka undivided Assam aka North East returned to India but with majority ethnic Chinese and Burmese population. In 1937 when the British separated Burma from India they retained Kamrupa, Manipur Tripura with India as these places have always been parts of India but now with majority ethnic Chinese and Burmese population due to 600 years of Chinese and Burmese occupation of these places. People with Chinese and Burmese blood are as foreign to India as the British, Portuguese, Afghan, Arab, Turks. British, French, Portuguese have left India because they were very few in numbers and had a decent country to return back to. People of Chinese, Burmese, Turkic, Afghan, Arab, Persian origin in india have huge population and have third class conditions in the countries of their origin. Neither can they return back to the country of their origin and neither can they integrate in India with Indians leading to perpetual ethnic, racial and communal tensions with the natives.
1
@shekharguptafanclub4120 Chinese Burmese Arabs Africans Persians Turks British French Portuguese are not Indians by origin but by nationality in case they can show continuous presence in India prior to 1955. These people even though they are of Indian nationality, have never accepted themselves as Indians which is the crux of Hindu Muslim communal tensions and insurgencies in north east. These are clashes of civilizations which is never going to end till one completely subjugates the other.
1
@sureshnaidu201 Kukis, Nagas, Mizos speak languages spoken in Burma. Rest of them speak a language similar to Bengali as Bangalis were the natives of North East. This is why almost all languages of North East have Bengali script.
1
@sureshnaidu201 If you are indeed a Naidu then you are a south Indian no way connected to north east just like rest of Indians. I am from Assam and I know the real history of these places which has been hidden from the public by the government to buy peace.
1
@sevenstars4817 Natives of North East are Bengalis not Chinese or Burmese. Prior to 1200 AD historically Kamrupa real name of North East has always been part of India. The Chinese Ahoms didn't make Kamrupa a part of China but settled in Kamrupa adopting local Bengali language culture and customs. 1400 to 1800 Kamrupa aka Assam was under Burmese occupation till British invaded Burma and annexed it with British India. This is how north east aka Kamrupa aka undivided Assam returned to India after 600 years of Chinese and Burmese occupation with large ethnic Chinese and Burmese population instead of the Bengalis who are the bhoomiputras of Kamrupa aka undivided Assam aka North East.
1
@shekharguptafanclub4120 people of different races and civilization do not mix with one another even after living together for several centuries. This has been observed across the world. Homogeneity leads to integrity and unity, heterogeneity cannot lead to integrity and unity. This is the reason why even in nature birds of same feather flock together.
1
@sonarbangla8711 that we can see inside China by the treatment of Uyghur Muslims.
1
@jojobabok9373 Western Europeans went to war over colonies in third world countries from which they got slaves, cannon fodder, riches for which they didn't pay even a penny. Germans, Italians who didn't have much colonies went to war to expand their share. What better way to do this than robbing the robbers?? This is why Roosevelt was adamant about abolition of colonies with the end of world war two which was one of the biggest reason for India's independence which is rarely covered in any Indian history book. Fyi, the ruling elite and the upper castes in the Muslim community of South Asia are those with foreign blood who due to the caste system among Muslims of South Asia don't marry the natives. Read Imran Khan's autobiography where he mentions that his ancestors are from Afghanistan which is why they never married the native Punjabis. The muslims of Rohilkhand in north India are Pathans who are of Afghan origin, the muslims of Hyderabad are Turkic and not Telegus. Afghans during Panini's time were of Indic origin but Mullah Baradar is a pure Pathan who have Turkic and Persian blood due to occupation of Afghanistan by central Asians. Same happened across South East Asia by the Chinese due to which the Indic Hindu civilizations disappeared from the region.
1
@jojobabok9373 It was cleaning of lower races that was one of the major reasons for world war two. Hitler wanted to make a British India out of USSR whom he considered untermenche i.e. low race. Hitler was enamored with the British Empire who are the progenitors of racism as we know it today. Germans and Italians wanted their share of the pie as colonies resulted in enormous wealth for the colonisers at the cost of those being colonised. Irish and English are not one and the same people. Irish are Celtics whereas English are Germanic Anglo Saxons. It was not the British but the Americans who were leading the war effort at latter half of world war two. UK could have easily resisted the pressure to decolonise as Germany and it's allies had lost the war. But, UK's devastated economy needed American money to revitalize it's economy. This is when UK under Attlee had to follow the wishes of USA which had sunk vast resources and lives in the war. Srivijaya, Kamboj, Champa were Indic prior to Sino invasion. Capital of Brunei, Bandar Seri Bagawan is actually sanskrit Bandar Shri Bhagwan.
1
@darkassassin9686 true, Mongols were civilised people who treated those with great barbarity who illtreated their ambassadors without any reason particularly the Iranians.
1