Comments by "LancesArmorStriking" (@LancesArmorStriking) on "VICE News"
channel.
-
149
-
46
-
38
-
38
-
35
-
34
-
@Founderschannel123
The issue for Russia is access.
Let me pose a question: would you rather have land in Mongolia, or Hawaii?
Most people say 'Hawaii' for the weather, but it's also because of location.
Hawaii has free access to the ocean, while Mongolia has none. This creates an economic problem.
Russia has an enormous amount of land, yes, but most of it is frozen and its coastline in frozen 90% of the year. In reality, only about 36% of Russia is habitable.
That's about the size of Kazakhstan.
So what good is land if you can't trade with other places? You're isolated.
Russia is in that situation. Why does it expand? It wants to freely trade.
The West doesn't seem to understand, because all of the countries (US, Britain, Australia, Japan, European bloc) have access to the ocean 100% of the year. No advanced ice-breaking ships. They just have it all the time, for free, and expect it as granted.
They don't seem to understand that if Russia 'just follow the rules', they become placed in a permanent disadvantage, and have to make concessions to other countries just so they can do what other countries are guaranteed by sheer luck.
Geography makes things unequal, and Russia will not accept a fate as a landlocked resource mine.
Its people would forever be exploited by Western corporations taking its resources, and selling finished products back to Russians at a high price.
This already happened in the 90s once. It will not happen again.
26
-
20
-
17
-
17
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
@Proud Murtadd
I did.
Homosexuality was illegal in Greece until 1951. The only reason that same-sex marriage is legal is because, despite still not being legal in Greece, the European Court of Justice ruled that homosexual marriage is officially recognized in all EU member states.
They had to do this in 2018.
Just because Greece has a vibrant gay culture, doesn't mean that its laws are the same. Which is exactly my point.
In the Islamic world, the opposite is true. In Jordan, Bahrain, and Iraq (all of which have legalized homosexual practice), not everyone hates homosexuals.
To the same token, Nigeria, another very Christian country, has criminalized homosexual behavior and marriage. I don't think I need to tell you about Russia- it's the same case there.
You act is is tolerance of marginalized social groups is some inherently un-Islamic trait, but it should be pretty obvious that this isn't the case. Non-Islamic countries can be less tolerant than certain Islamic ones.
It's also not timeless. Like I said with Greece, a society has to work to get to the point of acceptance, no matter the religion. Give Islam time to mellow out, and secularism will win out every time.
15
-
14
-
12
-
11
-
@Raj-dy2cn
No, it's not. Nigeria has a larger population than Western Europe, so imagine Spain, France, Germany, Austria, and Italy in one country. And "sparsely populated" doesn't make sense because despite having a bigger population, Nigeria is much much smaller. Same with Egypt, Ethiopia, DRC, Morocco, etc., all very dense for their size, concentrated in a few cities or coasts.
And even THAT doesn't matter because I'm not talking about the number of people.
I'm talking about combining a bunch of historically rival tribes with conflicting interests forcing them to create a government together.
That's why I used so many large countries; Africa is more diverse so it has more variety of tribes in a smaller area.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
@hankbridges7824
No, you wackjob. You can't control a plant- a part of nature. It spreads too fast, too easily.
This has been going on fpr 40 years, Reagan said the same thing you just did. He failed. So did Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, and Trump. You can't contain it. Open clinics to get addicts away from cocaine, and allow businesses to operate legally. If someone's gonna make money from it, it can at least be them, instead of cartels
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
Mendoza Juan
You're asking me about my best argument, but won't respond to any of it.
Where in my post did I deny science? Neurons in fetuses develop at ~22 weeks. Nerves are what facilitate thoughts and feelings, so before ~22 weeks, they are physically incapable of feeling pain.
What is unscientific here? Please explain.
I'm saying your philosophy is subjective!!
You just repeated what you believe, you haven't added anything! What is the evidence that the sentence is true??
You need to define your terms, or you're just saying nothing. What specific criteria make something alive?
No, it's not. The fetus is not alive.
This is the problem, you're not explaining what specific things about the fetus make it "alive."
My point was- "alive" is subjective. Bacteria is alive, but nobody makes coughing illegal.
I gave you the biological reason a fetus is not considered alive.
By saying "neither should the mothers" you're already imposing your values. You think the mothers shouldn't be doing something- that is your belief... your value.
No one's asking for a special pass. Especially not "Stacy," who has to put up with your bullshit when she's forced to carry her rapist's baby to term.
I'm pathetic? Look in the mirror.
This is the world you want?
"How were you born?"
"My daddy raped my mommy, she didn't want me but the GOP said she has to!"
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@lamarmcalister2449
Oh, so the U.S. should become a theocracy, then?
I'm sure a small group of people (or, as you put it, one man) won't take advantage of that and proclaim themselves ordained by God to rule... oh, wait
You're fucking ridiculous. Secularism is not anti-theism. It is unconcerned with religion, not opposed to it.
The Founding Fathers wanted people to be free to believe whatever they so pleased, but to not let that influence their earthly political decisions— or at least as little as possible.
They went our of their way to not mention a Christian God, going so far as to say 'Laws of Nature and Nature's God' and 'endowed by their Creator' (all nouns were capitalized in that period) because Enlightenment values (and the example set by King George) compelled them to exclude the idea of a theocracy of any kind. No mention of Jesus, the Bible, Moses, nothing.
It wasn't one man making the choice, it was the entire team.
6
-
6
-
Mendoza Juan
Embryology and biology have not determined that is a human infant. The fact that you even used the term "infant" reveals how little you understand to begin with.
"Life" isn't a set thing; its exact boundaries are unclear. The Catholic Church believes that a zygote just after conception is equivalent to a human life, but doesn't explain on what basis it makes that claim.
Bacteria are "alive", are we all committing involuntary manslaughter by destroying millions of them every second, then?
No- it's about human life?
Okay, then what defines that? A cell with human DNA? What happens when in-vitro fertilization fails, should the doctor be sent to prison for involuntary manslaughter, too? Are the parents accomplices? Yes, no?
If yes, then people that can't naturally get pregnant are taking a huge gamble when deciding whether to have children, right?
If no, then what is human life?
You conservatives don't seem to understand- the things that seem obvious, upon close inspection, aren't at all. It's like your arm: look at it, touch it. Seems pretty real, right? Solid, even.
Look closer. It's full of pores, and dead skin cells constantly being recycled. Not so solid and your skin is constantly becoming 'another set' of skin.
Look even closer. It's made of molecules, none of which are 'skin', mostly water. Go even deeper, it's all atoms and nothing's even touching. 99% of atoms are empty space. So, how exactly is your arm solid and real, when only 1% of it is material?
Same with life. There is no set, objective definition. "Life" is a human label which generally works, but fails with specifics. So, we instead look at what's moral: if a thing cannot feel pain, then 'hurting' or 'killing' it is impossible. So, before the embryo's nerve cells develop at about 22 weeks, abortion is legal.
5
-
5