Youtube comments of Edward McLaughlin (@edwardmclaughlin7935).
-
2400
-
1700
-
1600
-
1500
-
1400
-
769
-
618
-
373
-
358
-
345
-
327
-
316
-
273
-
269
-
262
-
259
-
250
-
245
-
241
-
236
-
233
-
227
-
213
-
211
-
208
-
207
-
195
-
195
-
188
-
171
-
161
-
158
-
155
-
152
-
144
-
140
-
134
-
126
-
125
-
125
-
117
-
115
-
I'm in UK, 64 years old. Not jabbed.
Wife had the virus, full bit: loss of taste and smell, fatigue, flu-like symptoms. Off work ten days and recovered within that time. So, seeing as we live together, I assume the virus had a go at me and didn't fancy staying.
Who knows how many millions of other viruses have visited my body even this past month, say? I meet a lot of people now we are allowed back in the pub - lots of handshakes and hugs. Flu, meningitis, herpes, tuberculosis are all out there with so many more.
If the cancer or the heart attack or stroke or texting truck driver don't get me, then one day I'll hug a perfectly healthy person and become prey to the virus they happen to be carrying. The flu got my Dad back in 2013; should we have made sure he never went out and met people and maybe he'd have had another year or two?
We have a choice to make. We either snap out of this fixation, psychosis that the MSM and governments have engineered, whereby we seem quite happy to destroy the economies (just the Western ones, note) that actually feed our kids and actually pay doctors to save lives; or we continue to stand idly by, while the - I'm going to call them 'collectivists' - destroy everything we have of our freedom to live as individually motivated humans.
Do like Mr DeSantis: grow a pair.
113
-
110
-
110
-
106
-
105
-
105
-
101
-
100
-
97
-
95
-
95
-
This phrase, " full-scale invasion"? Why does she and so many others, put so much emphasis on this odd and actually, simply misleading description? The initial force sent in by Russia on February 24th 2022 was really quite small and even now the forces active, even though much increased, are operating on a scale much less than could be provided.
For quite some time, the full phrase used by all UK MSM reporters was "unprovoked, full-scale invasion", but that first word (another lie) seems to have been dropped for some reason.
In any case, the regimented, mantra-like repetition of this choice of wording, by so many, signalled from the outset that the mind-benders in British intelligence circles were keen to brand a blatant untruth on the consciousness of the public - one which, with the passing of time, sounds increasingly hollow.
95
-
94
-
94
-
93
-
92
-
89
-
87
-
87
-
86
-
84
-
84
-
83
-
80
-
80
-
79
-
77
-
77
-
76
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
73
-
70
-
69
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
54
-
54
-
52
-
Out of all the vaccines I have taken in my life: Tetanus, small pox, polio etc., never before have I seen so much confusion over a vaccine that says I have to wear a mask, and socially distance even when fully vaccinated. Apparently I could still contract or spread the virus even when fully vaccinated. Never had to have a double shot, never been bribed by establishments to take the vaccine in order to
win a car, cash, or other prizes.
I never had to worry about cardiac issues and/or blood clots and sadly more, I didn’t have to worry about death. I was never judged if I didn’t take it. I was never discriminated against for travel or other regular services. The vaccines I have listed above never told me I was a bad person for not taking it, or taking it for that matter. I have never seen a vaccine that threatened the relationship between a family member or a close friend. Never seen it used for political gain and never seen it used to persuade children in favour of free ice cream or teenagers going into a night club. I have never seen a worry about a mix and matching and yet told it’s OK to do it one day and not the next and on and off again.
I have never seen a vaccine threaten someone’s livelihood, job, school, etc. I have never seen a vaccine that allows a twelve year old’s consent to supersede his/her parent’s consent. So after all I have said, can someone tell me how on God’s green earth I am a racist or conspiracy theorist. Non educated, non researched because I am not willing to take this vaccine. And the clinical trials will not be over for at least two years from now.
Finally, after all the vaccines (shots) I listed above, I have never seen a vaccine like this one that discriminates, divides, and judges a society such as this one. So much information is censored, deleted and removed from the internet. So many doctors, scientists, are censored and forbidden to speak out or ask legitimate questions when what is being allowed or not allowed does not make sense. This sure is one powerful vaccine. IT does all of these things that I have mentioned and yet? It doesn’t do what all the other vaccines that I have mentioned earlier were designed to do. That is to fight off “COVID”, a virus with a natural recovery rate of 99% thanks to our miraculous immune system!
52
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
Hmmm. Ferguson's initial handiwork could be looked on as perhaps an accident - the plane that went into the first Tower.
However, more recently, Captain Vallance and co pilot Whitty punched a hole in the other - made it clear, this was an act of war, highly planned.
At this moment in time, we people are looking up aghast at the smoke, wondering how long it's going to take to get everyone out safe. In for a shock weren't they? Unimaginable the whole lot was to come down so rapidly.
Our economy, our way of life, our civilisation is on their menu. If we don't wake the fuck up very, very soon, we're served.
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
The young woman and man at the start, showed in a clear, lucid manner, what caused the election to go how it did. In response and in obvious dread recoil, the two presenters showed the rot that has set-in to 'progressive' politics, with the familiar hidebound refusal to listen to the valid concerns of the public that things have gotten out of hand.
The frustration was registered that the young pair were not focusing on policy. Perhaps if Harris had spoken of policy such focus could have been brought into play. Instead she concentrated on filling air-time with redundant verbiage. Nobody is going to be inspired by such vacuousness.
The young man's astute criticism of the way that popular media has been dragooned in the service of the one, by now predictable world view; was crassly condensed and evaluated, to camera, as being the result of some sort of knee-jerk, anti-woke animosity bearing hints of racism.
You two presenters - you and millions like you, are why the Democrats lost and lost big.
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
The initial image, whereby Carlson is portrayed by KK as a latter-day George Bernard Shaw - by extension, that Putin is today's Stalin - is a grossly distorted picture. A departure perhaps from the other popular trope by which Putin equals Hitler, but equally as wilfully disfiguring.
Shaw was putting lipstick on what the world knows now and largely knew then to be a very ugly pig. Stalin wielded his authority as leader of a brutal, totalitarian, communist expansionist state that openly cast itself as being in pursuit of the downfall of the West and its capitalist economies. Putin is not Stalin and Russia is not any longer a communist state. Russia now 'does' capitalism - it wants to be left alone to do business so that its people can prosper. Putin is no saint but his motive seems to be to try to do his best for ordinary Russians. Today's Russia is surely not paradise, but it is vastly improved and is interested in improvement.
In contrast, yes, a great number of people in and of the West, have come to look on in horror as their leaders show themselves increasingly to be not merely uninterested in their respective peoples, but decidedly joined to a mission to undermine individual freedoms and decimate the wealth of working people so that it can be transferred to 'other interested parties'.
I do not hate the West. The West is where the dinghies sail to and not from, for good reason. Western nations today and for a long time have been simply the best place that humans have ever had in which to live secure and happy lives. However, we now find ourselves in a very dynamic situation whereby those securities and any happiness is threatened through the takeover of our political machinery by an homogenous movement which skilfully fields its representatives in their position as 'penetrators'. That is the truth despite the somewhat condescending summary agreed upon in the earlier part of this discussion.
Given our emerging consciousness, it is small wonder that large numbers of people align with and are keen to hear voices such as Tucker Carlson, that question the received narratives. One such narrative is the ancient British one that Russia is our eternal and irredeemable foe - our veritable 'hun' that has to be hated and cannot be granted any credit.
Not even mentioned marginally in this discussion is the fact that it is the West that has brought about this war and could have ended it without injury to itself at any time.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
None of us, as remote observers, can be sure just what is happening in Ukraine. The levels of propaganda continue to be obvious in both camps. Given that situation, all one can do is conduct a wide consultation of differing views and, having done that, put together the picture that seems most probable. As I watch this man and listen to his analysis, increasingly he seems to be going through the motions of filling lots of time with little information.
Further, his repeated assumption that Russia is somehow in danger of running out of men and resources, while mentioning nothing of the dire situation in which Ukraine finds itself, seems to run very much counter to the account given in so many quarters, not just from the expected sources but from an increasing number who have come to be recognised as Ukraine supporters.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
I think that in truth, more than 22% are unhappy, but they just don't want to appear to have that so-unattractive trait: a negative disposition.
Actually, British youth have the edge over their 'more contented' European counterparts, in that so many of them have seen/are seeing the truth of the dire prospects they are faced with. The truth is that the UK government is solidly not on the side of any of its people, and this is the case with most of the other European governments, run as they are by globalists, to whom the whole notion of 'our people' is alien and to be extinguished, at any cost. Our rulers have come to revile humans.
British youth are increasingly aware that they are being ruled by people who despise them. Young Germans, French, Italians etc, need to wise-up to their reality.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
As much as we might insist that we should expunge all vices, there are some times in nearly all our lives, when we do things we maybe should not. In fact, transgressions are a form of safety valve. There was a time in the US, when to go out and drink whiskey was considered a vice, a crime.
We need vices - not just personally - society needs vice. Some people need alcohol, some need drugs. Some need to pay for sex. Some people need to gamble.
All such things would be extinguished by CBDCs. More innocently, how would I throw a couple of quid into a busker's hat? How would I let my children have a little something to spend on their kids?
Another point is that we would abolish the black market. Yes I know it's supposed to be bad, but it isn't. The black market lets things get done that wouldn't get done were we to have CBDCs. So many small and struggling tradesmen can only live by doing a few cash jobs. If the cash goes, that's a whole swathe of trade gone - little jobs not done.
Beyond all of that, CBDCs are slavery. We cannot let them do that to our kids.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
The fuel price rises are just one element of what is ranged against us, and it is not temporary. Food will go the same way, to the point at which our ability to fend for ourselves is ended and we are forced to rely on state handouts.
Strange that this new crisis should be upon us, right at the point at which our two year period of economic self-destruction at the hands of needless lockdown, is losing its grip. Almost as if all of this had been planned and were being managed?
All of which speculation is to risk being called a conspiracy theorist, and we all know don't we that history can offer us no instances whereby men and women have gathered in secrecy to make plans with a view to gaining power over other people?
These lunatics who reckon that Davos, Blackrock, the Trilateral Commission, Central Banks, the IMF and others have decided that they can now, through technology, own everything and everyone, by destroying the economies that allow people to survive; and then stepping in to 'protect' the human race - they're just paranoid aren't they?
When Uncle Klaus told us that by 2030 we would own nothing, and we would be happy - he was just having a bit of a laugh wasn't he?
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
If I had Bitcoin I'd certainly choose this as a good time to sell; just before it does one of its customary bungee-jumps. Then I'd buy some more on the dip. Just where ethics comes into any of this is a puzzle. As for your Wife's crypto? In what way was it your Wife's if she had no say in its sale?
Your ethics seems to have at its base, some sort of antipathy with anyone who tries to avoid the dollar system." India, China, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Colombia, Mexico, Brasil, Nigeria and.........shock horror........Russia". How do you think this will sit with people who are viewing you from those countries?
This 'non-transparent way' you portray as being somehow unethical, has been devised and is being adopted by increasing numbers, because they have witnessed the weaponisation of the Dollar - they don't want to be next to get hosed-down by Washington, on the pretext of 'defending democracy'.
A lot of people are indeed trying to avoid sanctions. Who gets to impose these sanctions and on what basis? How is it supposed to be right and good, that people should trust their hard-earned currency in a system that is so corrupted? This' free market' - where is it, because it's not anywhere I can see in the Western economies.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It is frightening to hear from such an esteemed observer as Niall Ferguson, when he clearly signals that he shares Lynsey Graham's 'best dollars we could spend' attitude, whereby the US/UK pact pumps in the funding so that Ukrainians can do the dying.
He speaks as though firmly in the grip of the hackneyed view that Putin is the new Hitler and this is our 1938 moment all over again - that the only way to deal with Putin is eradication, otherwise he will rampage all the way to Lisbon. This is simply an untenable proposition, given that his huge efforts have brought such small territorial gains, fighting just the one army.
He shows that he is totally oblivious to the predicament in which Russia finds itself. No mention is made of NATO's relentless move eastward and the positioning of missiles and military bases right up to Russia's border - some fifteen US bases are being installed just in Finland, for example. How is Russia supposed to react to that? How would the US react to such encroachments on its borders? Sure, they even have the Monroe Doctrine that categorically prohibits such developments.
The Biden administration's dealings with the Russians over Ukraine, are described by Ferguson as 'appeasement'. How, in any way, can appeasement take the form of the repeated, stated aim of dismantling the Russian Federation by using Ukrainian forces as a proxy?
The bottom line is that the US/UK pact can and will survive if Russia achieves its objective in Ukraine; while Russia knows that it is in a fight for the very existence of its sovereignty, and that the push from the West seeks to wrest power from Russians and to seize the land mass of Russia, with all its resources so as to then gear-up for the march on that other perceived enemy. Is China supposed to be too unsophisticated to recognise this?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The NHS waiting list, and 'what's gone so wrong'?
How about the fact that our government, when faced with a middle-ranking viral outbreak, chose to select a range of specialist advisers that had no virologist in the ranks at the outset, nor and epidemiologist - instead a whole team of behavioural psychologists, bristling with schemes by which the people could be made to cower in their homes as a preliminary step towards their mass formation psychosis? The bright idea (because it will signal the potential horror so vividly) of building the Nightingale Hospitals....and then disbanding them, some without ever admitting one patient - none ever having treated more than a handful. Money no object.
First signs of warning came, when thousands of elderly sick people were turfed-out of hospital wards and taken back to their nursing homes not only to die, but to take sickness back to all their fellow residents. All those pensions nipped-off eh? Result.
The £billions thrown into the Track and Trace scheme, and testing regimes generally - the millions of NHS hours expended - that were more to do with inculcation towards digital identity surveillance than dealing with any virus? The other £billions spent on coercing people into taking part in the experimental mRNA injections - the 'light at the end of the tunnel' - that turn out to offer no light at all?
The continuing priority given to people who have woken up with a bit of a sniffle, over those whose known tumour is daily figuring out how to spread and progress through their body. The chest pain that might go away, but didn't etc etc?
The absolute crime of forcing people to die alone 'because covid restrictions'? The two-year and counting, transformation of GP services from 'sit down and talk and be listened to', to 'don't bother unless tested positive we really are under extreme pressure as you must understand DO NOT COME TO THE CENTRE'?
The, by now widely realised, fraud in the classification of causes of death so as to keep the doom narrative stoked with daily death figures for the BBC to trumpet?
How to alienate a population from its health service, in a series of well-planned moves.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
An old Irish yarn:
Michael goes to the doctor complaining of strange pains in his chest. The doctor examines him, finding nothing to indicate that treatment is required. He tells Michael all is well but Michael insists something is wrong. Doc' looks at his record, sees a history of similar reports, senses a straight conversation is needed, so sits back and tries to put him at ease.
"Michael, please understand that you are a fit, healthy man in your prime. You need to look to the positive and not dwell on these worries you seem to be having, because this can lead to you thinking you are ill when you are not. The body is a mysterious thing so that if you THINK you are ill you can make yourself feel ill"
Michael goes home, not entirely happy.
A few days later, Micheal's brother Eammon is stopped in the street by the doctor.
"How is that brother of yours, Eammon?"
"Not too good doctor, he won't get out the chair and just moans all the time, won't leave the house even to go put his horses on, this is me now going to the bookies to put him his bets on"
"Ah well you see, he has what we call a 'psychosomatic condition' - excuse my French - which means he makes himself feel unwell because he thinks on it too much. He only THINKS he is ill"
"Right enough he does look to the downside of things - I'll try get him to buck-up. 'He only thinks he's ill' gotcha, I'll keep that in mind"
Another chance meet two days later.
"How is our 'patient' doing then Eammon?"
"I'm having to say he's for the worse doctor. He's taken to his bed and won't stir. He won't eat anything and drinks only the tea I take to him...are you sure he's well?"
"Please, Eammon, remember what I told you, he only th....."
"Yes, yes, he only THINKS he's ill and that's the problem all"
A week later, again the two bump into each other, this time in the butcher's.
"Well now, any improvement with the worrier?"
"Not a bit of it doctor, I'm just here to get some bacon to fry, get the smell of it have him take something. He seems to be just withering away and he now starts with the coughing and all."
"It's difficult I know Eammon but believe me I've seen this before and we have to be patient and persist. He only THINKS he is ill and so his body acts-out being ill."
"Aye doctor, we'll pull him through this together."
A few days later the doctor shuffles into the pub. On seeing Eammon enquires again.
"Tell me then Eammon, did the smell of you frying the rashers do the trick?"
"I had to eat the lot myself" he says, "He never even looked at the plate I took him. The cough is worse and he shivers now even with the extra blanket over him. Could you not just call and........"
"Ah ah ah Eammon" His hand raised, eyes closed and face turned to one side "We must stand firm together. He only THINKS he is unwell"
Eammon necked his whiskey and left without words.
The next day, Eammon is walking past the surgery just as the doctor is setting-out on his rounds.
"What's the news of the fella this day Eammon?"
"Well the truth of it is doctor, he THINKS he's dead"
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Looking at your map, it seems fairly natural and in order, that Russia should be so active in the Arctic. Millions of square miles of Russian territory lies within the Arctic circle, and its entire northern shoreline meets the Arctic Ocean. So what that the Arctic and the North Atlantic are next to each other? Russia makes no claim to have an interest in the North Atlantic, beyond its right to traverse international shipping routes?
"We are, dare I say it, at war with Russia..." Well why? Why on earth are we in any way involved in NATO's thrust eastward, encroaching on Russia's borders and challenging their security? The Western narrative has it that Russia is the aggressor, but just imagine how the US would react if Russia were to set-up military bases in Mexico, with missiles sited within minutes of US strategic assets? How would that be treated?
What gives the UK the right to regard the far north 'as our backyard', while China is regarded here as pushing its nose in by its use of Arctic shipping routes, and in working with Russia to gain access to resources?
The way that climate change is over-stated here is also something of a giveaway. The truth is that the climate is not changing very much at all at either pole.
Finally, since you used a short clip of footage from what looks like the Nordstream pipeline destruction, it seems appropriate to ask the question: who did that then?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
A very worthwhile talk, outlining much of the perilous stage at which we find ourselves. The mention of events in Ukraine though, seem a bit out of whack. The figure of 200,000 Russian troops 'lost', for instance, needs to be looked upon with some suspicion. Whose figures does he cite? Also, the casual reference to the effect of sanctions, which seems to take it as a given that they have crippled the Russian economy. Damaged somewhat, perhaps, but not significantly (while at the same time, the economy of Germany - and therefore of Europe - has been dealt a possibly fatal blow by the actions, principally of the US)
The references generally to the conflict, seem to come from a position firmly behind the US/NATO narrative of Russia being the totally unjustified aggressor. The speaker seems to have fallen in line with the huge simplification that abounds in the Western MSM; ignoring the events that led to the conflict.
Admittedly, my points are somewhat on the margin of his main thesis, but his seeming inattention to this extremely crucial situation, does, to my way of thinking, detract from his argument to quite a degree.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Paddy is walking down Ballymuck high street when he meets the village doctor walking towards him.
"Ah good morning Paddy, how's that brother of yours doing?"
"Not too good I'm afraid doctor, after coming to see you the other day he's not for leaving his bed"
"Ahh, I told him there's nothing wrong with him it's all in his head - he thinks he's ill so he feels ill"
Next day, same encounter.
"Good morning Paddy, what's the news on him?"
"Sorry to say doctor, but he's weakening and him with terrible sweats and all burning up with the temperature"
"Tell him from me would you: he only THINKS he's ill. He'll be fine when he shakes himself"
Two days later.
"And how is it with him today?"
"Dear me doctor, I'm just on my way to ask you to come see him. He's broken out now in sores and the coughing"
"Ach sure this is all part of the psychosomatic divellment that's set about him. Tell him from me there's nothing wrong with him, he only THINKS he's ill"
Next day.
"Is he up and about yet the big fellah?"
"He's not indeed doctor. I've had to leave him just now to run out to put his horses on and he's wasting away now doctor, hasn't eaten nor drank now for three days. His hair's falling out and he barely opens his eyes."
"We have to be strong Paddy and impress upon him that it's all a figment of his own imagination - he only THINKS he's ill and with a man so set in his ways that's a strong thing to break; but break it we must you tell him from me now"
The day after
"Well, give us it then. Can we see any improvement? How is he today?"
"You'll never believe the strength of his hide doctor. It's dead he thinks he is now"
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
What the planners of CBDC fail to take into account is the effect on production; in its base meaning of just doing. The only reason that people work hard, take risks and innovate, is so that they might get a return, in the form of money, that will allow them to put things in their life which they desire. They might desire a holiday or a Range Rover, a house or a set of golf clubs - short term wants and longer term aims. All of this is humans being human, and almost by accident, their activities have brought about, after many years of aspiration and effort, the unsung miracle of stuff-a-plenty.
We can glean from the pronouncements of the politicians (and the characters coming out of the shadows to take their place without our votes) that our wants and aims regarding possessions and wealth, are to be consigned to history and that 'stuff' and the possession of stuff, is to be erased.
The absolute torpor that would descend upon the world? The moribund state in which aspiration is snuffed?
Have they really, really thought about this, and what the effect this will have when inevitably, billions of people wake up to what has been done to them?
2
-
2
-
2
-
The word 'legal' is key here. Of course, all tax belongs to the state, legally; but who legislates to put the laws in place? The state, through government, sets the rate of tax and so legally compels those who work and create wealth, to give up some of that wealth. It knows that if it sets that rate too high, it risks receiving nothing; for who would bother working if there is insufficient reward?
The legal argument is not really what matters, for the laws will be made to do whatever the tax-takers choose. However, the real nub is what people feel is just. Set taxes at a reasonable level and workers will comply by going out to work and paying tax. There is a point though, at which the act of working becomes simply not worth the effort.
It's not about legality, it's about the sense of injustice felt by workers. Until of course, the totalitarian state is brought about, and people can be forced to work.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
How is any of this a shock? We are in the grip of the money party and they will allow us to wave our little red flags and then our little blue flags, and sing our anthems and feel happy while we are being made into paupers. Get a grip Mr Murphy.
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.
It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, addressing the United States Bankers' Association, New York, 1924.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
How long is it going to take for the penny to drop? These lockdowns are the weapon by which small and medium business is destroyed. Sound whacky? Beyond belief? Why would a government do that to its own economy?
The New World Order has no place for a freedom loving, prosperous general population. Democracy is inefficient to them, as it encourages the sense of individual human rights that demands progress through the consumption of resources based on enterprise and hard work. Western Civilisation, with its science and its capitalism, is a particular offender in that it is the most potent driver of improved living standards that humans have ever devised.
The people who have set this upon us and who are determined to see it through, have clearly outlined how things are to be. They are going to "Build Back Better". The word in there to be questioned is, 'better for who and in what way?'
The same people assure us that "By 2030 you will own nothing, and you will be happy". That's not conspiracy theory, it is analysis of a statement from Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum.
Our transition into that state in which we will own nothing, has already started. We are all at the start of the process which will take more of our personal wealth being put in the hands of the state. That state will eventually become the World State, run by the technocrats and the bankers.
But for now, we must be kept occupied by a common cold virus that the doom narrators have positioned as the bastard offspring of the bubonic plague and ebola.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"300,000 deaths in the US alone." The US has a population of some 331 million. The daily death rate averages around 7,700.
The first recorded covid-related death in the US was on February 6th.
That's 321 days. In those 321 days we could normally expect to see 321 x 7,700 deaths from all causes. That's a total of 2,471,700 deaths.
Even if all of the 300,000 deaths quoted were actually due to covid (and we all know they were not) that would mean that excess deaths were up by around 12%.
The lockdowns that have been imposed by governments in many parts of the world will - according to the WHO - lead to the deaths of around 1.8 million people in developing regions.
The lockdowns will lead to deaths far exceeding covid related deaths, in developed nations due to cancer treatment delay/cancellation, cardiac arrest, stroke and much more. The WHO have stated that lockdowns do one thing only: they make poor people poorer.
Why are we locking down people's lives, destroying the businesses whose tax pays for healthcare for at least the poorest in some countries and ALL in some others? Why are we doing all of this, as a response to knee-jerk journalism and its dog-bark headlines?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes, all of this is accurate and thank you for articulating what needs to be recognised.
However, what we need to do urgently now, is ask ourselves why this has been done to us.
Was it done to save lives? No. Do our leaders know it's not saved lives? Yes.
Did they know from the outset that lockdowns do not save lives? Yes.
So what is the purpose of locking down a society for such a long time?
Lockdown is the perfect tool for restricting trade to the point at which businesses are no longer viable. Neil sees our coming winter as a make or break point - he is right. The theatres, pubs, restaurants and small shops that have been resilient enough to re-open and try to claw their way back; are going to be annihilated by the next round of lockdowns, which we all know are coming and very few people can face talking about.
During any such alleviation of lockdown, the vaccine passport will be enforced on places of gathering and I will be in that same boat as Neil: excluded. The money in my pocket which small businesses so desperately need; the services they want to provide, which I really want; will have a barrier put between them. By this horrendous bind, our economy will be pared-down, the workforce made dependent on state aid, and the social experiment can be taken to its next stage.
God help us all, because our leaders will most certainly not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Bank of England does not print money, it prints currency - fiat currency. Why is that distinction important? Because all fiat currencies are worth what their respective governments decide they are worth, and as we all know, governments always tell the truth and always act in the interests of the common populace. Fiat currencies can be and are, routinely manipulated, the usual result being to transfer the wealth of working people into the hands of others. In fact, the operation of fiat currency is a vessel ideally designed for use by those who seek to take from one pool of wealth and pour into another in a manner that is easily concealed.
Every fiat currency in history has suffered degradation in buying power due to the practice of inflation through the issuance of additional units of currency that are backed by no effort. To note just one instance, no-one had laboured to create the hundreds of billions of Pounds that were 'created' as part of the response to the lockdown catastrophe. Consequently, all the wages that have been earned since that creation have been, and remain for all time, weakened in buying power; and there is no other reason to bother getting up each morning to go and earn wages, than to gain the ability to buy things.
We happen to live at a time when our fiat currency, linked as it is to the fortunes of the dollar/debt system, is in severe decline. In fact the whole of our banking system is in a very perilous state. In this we are not alone; governments across the globe know that a new way of international trading will have to be found. In anticipation of this, some governments have, over the past few years, been busy - very quietly busy - procuring and stockpiling gold. China, Russia and India are foremost in this trend but many less powerful nations are following suit.
Why are they all failing to see the sense in Richard J Murphy's proclamation regarding the 'barbarous relic'?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It would be interesting to know the basis on which the Professor makes his claim that the Russians have incurred casualties of 700,000. Also, how has it been revealed to him that the Russians are employing 'meat-grinder' tactics?
If we are to learn the truth of what is happening in Ukraine - just as importantly, why it is happening - it is clear that we need to consult sources outside the MSM; as they have shown themselves to be unreliable throughout the conflict.
Amid the competing range of biases, very little can be established with any certainty. However, the one statistic that seems to be agreed across the board is that the Russian artillery firing rate has, for most of the period of engagement, been very much in their favour to the tune of something like 8 to 1. Given that the vast majority of casualties in this form of fighting, results from the use of artillery, it follows that for every Russian casualty, there must be around eight Ukrainians. If the Professor's estimation of Russian casualties is taken as accurate, then the Ukrainians must have suffered horrendously, losing over five million troops. This figure is surely too high but how else is one to interpret the Professor's figures?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
TRIUMPH
It is essential to the grip of the bankers, that the term 'inflation' is confused with price rises. There is inflation and it is the increase in the volume of currency units, be it pounds, dollars, whatever. Every new £ introduced to the economy demeans, dilutes, degrades the buying power of all pre-existing £s. Of course, just one £ would not be noticed, but the UK economy was treated to over £400 billion in recent years, on order that people be paid to stay home, drink tea and watch Netflix.
Since then the £ has been greatly reduced in its buying power and the consequence of that is that more of them are required to buy the same stuff they could prior to the 'money printing'. Nothing new about this other than the unprecedented scale; but it is a very tried and tested way that central banks basically steal wealth.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.
It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, addressing the United States Bankers' Association, New York, 1924.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sir Mark Walport seems to be fully behind the move to have the state jab every arm in the land, multiple times.
His 'nothing sinister going on here' has itself a sinister ring to it. His claim that the mRNA treatments for which no long-term effects can be available in this short term deployment; can be regarded as every bit as wholesome as the polio or the TB vaccinations we all know to have been safe; less than convincing. (Safe, who knows yet, maybe because they were actual vaccines and not modifications to our RNA?)
His assurance of the ability of the jabs, to stop the passing of infection, is contrary to previous information from ministers and advisers that in fact the jabs do not stop people becoming infected, nor do they stop that infection being passed to others - their saving grace being that they alleviate symptoms and can curtail the onset of serious illness.
If, as he states, almost 90% of adults have been jabbed at least once, then how is it that we are not just totally in the clear now, instead of being held in this doom-narrative grip? What percentage of cover are we to aim for?
How can he be sure that in fact the jabs are the sole reason for our improved ratio between 'cases' and hospitalisations? Have our abilities to develop natural herd immunity been reduced to zero?
The 'India' or 'Delta' variant as it became known, has turned out to be, as he must surely be aware, nothing of concern. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtOu7jx3snQ
Meanwhile, the economy that feeds all our kids and pays Sir Mark's salary, is being slow-bled by the day; it's workers thrown onto state dependency.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
After a year of rampant Russophobia in the pages of The Spectator, it seems that there's a bit of an under-the-covers attempt to wake up to reality while saving face. However, even now, Owen Matthews sneers at the Russian economy as being insignificant in terms of its GDP. What sets the Russian economy apart from all of those in the West, is that it is running a surplus.
That quaint old habit of spending less than you earn, has its merits. The Western economies are increasingly bankrupt and only survive, courtesy of the scam being run between their respective treasuries and central banks whereby they simply hit the keyboard to produce out of thin air, new 'money' for their supine populations to buy more stuff.
This mis-match is the real war. An increasing number of countries (and Russia is merely the one being 'focused-on' right now) have had enough of being expected to stump up so that the profligate West can carry on holding all the goodies. Russia's stand is against an arrogant, effete and vainglorious band of thieves.
This is a bigger war than any we have known, yet the flaccid reporters of the West just cannot think outside their comfort zone of those other times of "starting off weak, then getting stronger to finally come through". Not this time.
The West is putting itself to sleep as painlessly as possible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Good to see Prof' Mearsheimer being given a platform to speak in the established media. Across the alternative scene he has from the outset been a central source of truth regarding the origins of the Ukraine conflict, offering much to counter the tub-thumping, Russophobic memery that generally prevails in the UK on this crucial issue.
He honestly admits that he is flummoxed by Trump's antics. Anyone who, at this stage, claims they have a sure grasp of Trump's direction, is either a fool or a manipulator. There are those who are so desperately in need of some antidote to the nonsense of the Biden administration, that they hang on to every Trump move and read it as salvation. This faith stands little chance of being rewarded. When the Trump ego comes up against the hard rock of the Russian predicament, things could become very dangerous.
Russia's predicament then and the problem we all now face, is that it has to reach that point at which it feels once again that it has scotched permanently the project that seeks to dismantle its state and to wrest control over the Russian land-mass along with its globally important resources; thereafter to direct aggression toward its other imagined nemesis, China.
Whatever Trump promises to the Russians, whatever deals he might propose, they know he is, with all his flamboyant gesture, just one more US President - they come and they go, while in their supposed exclusion, the Nulands/Blinkens/Sullivans etc who brought us to this impasse, remain dedicated to their mission, assiduously preparing for the next phase.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The shitshow that is our current situation has been put in place by the action of the US Federal Reserve which was itself modelled on the Bank of England. The two have lorded-it over the world's economies since 1913. The following quotation is taken from a speech given by then Governor of the Bank of England, Montagu Norman, to a gathering of the United States Bankers' Association in 1924, and gives an insight as to the aims of the pact.
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.
It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wow, thanks so much for this Rick. Great to see that one of my guitar heroes is as well, a great, down to earth character. Some great lines there, revealing of great experience, with a humour that evades jadedness. A true artist.
On a sombre note: I'm same year as Steve, just a little older and, well, time's wingéd chariot and all that; the thought hits that we have been robbed of a full year of performances by this man - and so many others. We all must ask ourselves, 'how many times that year do I have left to get stuff done?' It must surely be so with all performers: musicians of all genres; actors; dancers; poets etc. Those just starting up also and trying to carve a place out in their chosen profession.
What I'm getting round to asking is: why are there no voices of protest or at least questioning, regarding the continued death-grip that is being exerted on all public-space events and performances due to the lockdowns? I ask this question increasingly and yes, I'm assailed with screams of '.....denier'. I'm not denying anything, I'm challenging the veracity of lockdown as a solution. I'm just so puzzled as to how we can just carry on accepting this situation, especially when the science that purports to supply justification for our continued zombie, atomised existence, is debatable.
Sorry to respond to such a great interview in this manner, but as the band said way back there: 'something better change'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Again with the figures (from the mask-loving one) that are nothing to get worked up about
Today is day 492 since the first covid death in the UK.
The all-cause average death rate in UK is approx' 1600
1600 x 492 = 787200
There are four years since 1990, when records were first compiled in their current form at ONS, during which a higher percentage of the England/Wales population died of all causes, than were recorded in 2020.
Why no masks in those years? No schools closed, no travel restrictions, no closure of pubs and restaurants, no closure of shops, no enforced working from home, no furlough, no psychological manipulation by carefully selected communists at SAGE and no hectoring for people to receive experimental injections.
Lastly, the scientific evidence is clear and well established that the masks worn by the public do not stop viral transmission.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The task being performed - yes, literally 'performed' - by the current crop of western political leaders, is to put daily before their respective peoples, the evidence that will convince them that democracy is a system that has become outmoded, has had its day and that therefore, its dissolution, when shortly it comes, is not to be challenged but rather, to be welcomed in favour of its successor.
Just look at them plying their repeated inanities and ask yourself how they could get things so very wrong on every occasion, without putting great effort into not slipping-up, once in a while, and absent-mindedly doing something right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
People were trusting of their governments. They made the mistake, through inattentiveness, of believing that despite repeated evidence, their respective governments had the public interest at heart. We were too polite, too amenable and too willing to be manipulated 'for the common good'. We assumed political leaders were brought up by people like us, to be like us. They weren't and they aren't. They are sociopaths.
The masks performed one purpose: they provided a very cheap, universal advertising campaign, the message of which was "death is all around us, leaping freely from me to you, you to me". The truth of it was and is, that death was never any more free to leap than it has been for all of human history.
The governments of the West used this fabricated fear to shut down so much of the economy that actually allows us to survive. The plandemic was the starter-motor; the main engine is now quietly running in the background, destroying supply chains and further damaging prosperity.
The wheels of the doom-narrative's viral chariot have fallen off, as they always had to; not due to the experimental injections but to our innate immune development. How convenient that right when people were entertaining ideas of returning to having a free and prosperous future, we should find ourselves being herded down the next doom-laden path of war and of "Putin's price hikes"; our energy bills going through the ceiling while beneath our feet lay all the resources we need but must leave untouched because 'climate change'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Conservatives doing what has become their reason for being, since John Major's declaration that "If it isn't hurting, it isn't working." The even worse part is that, when the Conservatives are kicked-out of office, they will be replaced by another party which will do nothing to alleviate our problems, and will in all likelihood, just accelerate our downfall.
Just one or two points in the video with which I would take issue. The remarks made that "...inflation is probably least to do with government policy." and "You might point to some of the failings of Bank of England monetary policy, but that's another issue." Well, no actually. Inflation is the increase in currency supply through the 'introduction' of additional units (£ in our case) from thin air. None of this can be done without the full consent of both the government and the BofE. Their actions are the fundamental cause of inflation and very clearly not 'another issue'.
Government 'support' during covid was not understandable at all. The closing-down of society and the separation put between small/medium businesses and their customers was known at the time to be ineffective in 'the war against' what was also know at the time to be a middle-ranking corona virus that posed a threat to very few.
"Despite the cost of living crisis, rents rose over 6% last year..." Surely the fact that such a rise has taken place, is not 'despite' the cost of living crisis - for many it is a major factor of that crisis?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Spot-on regarding the moribund state of so many cities in former free-West economies. If you listen to the financial commentary, everything is couched in terms of 'the recovery' - so much conjecture about what shape it will take and how long it will take to get fully up and running again.
Yet the truth of it is that, despite the glimmers of normality, the offices and workspaces are largely just as deserted as they were this time last year; the transport systems are coasting at best - at the other end of the scale, the airline industry is mortally wounded. The hospitality industry is bleeding dry due to the continuing insistence that it must treat every customer at the door, inhospitably, thus killing its major selling point.
At this stage it is perfectly clear that the people who are directing us now, are fully intent on destroying the small/medium business sector, seizing its former workforce for their own ends by means of furlough and 'stimmy' payments, weaning them onto the state teat.
The long march, come to fruition.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Quite apart from the Bitcoin discussion, there seems to be an inordinate faith in, and a slavish - quite literally - devotion to the operation of fiat currencies here. 'Stick with fiat currency because it will be of value, come what may'? OK. Let's look at how our hallowed Pound has kept its value over the past 25 years.
One ounce of gold bought on this date in 2000, would have required handing over £189. Imagine then, if you had bought that one ounce and simply held on to it until today. To buy an ounce of gold today would require payment of £2232. Other investments might have proved more lucrative but that is how gold and the Pound have fared.
Alternatively, we could have taken Professor Murphy's advice and stuck with the fiat currency, dutifully leaving it in our bank. During that time our £189 would have earned interest so that it now stands at the princely sum of £324. So fiat currency has performed dreadfully.
In a quarter of a century, our deposit in the bank has been effectively whittled away. Our trusty fiat currency has done what fiat currencies will always do: been used as a tool to rob people of the buying power of their wages, their savings and their pensions.
Please explain, Professor, the basis of your enthusiasm for staying in a scheme which performs so poorly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, Governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth. Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become "profiteers," who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.
Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of Society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
John Maynard Keynes "The Economic Consequences of the Peace" (1919)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.
It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, addressing the United States Bankers' Association, New York, 1924.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As an aside to this whole question, I would add another.
Why, in the political/social sphere, do we constantly refer to the 'Anglo-Saxon' influence? The Saxons, as we all know, were totally divested of their powers, in and shortly after 1066. What superseded them, as far as hard power goes, was the Norman way of having things. Every thing that the English and then the British did to influence other parts of the world, was done not to any Saxon dictate, but to that of Normans.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, Governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some. The sight of this arbitrary rearrangement of riches strikes not only at security, but at confidence in the equity of the existing distribution of wealth. Those to whom the system brings windfalls, beyond their deserts and even beyond their expectations or desires, become "profiteers," who are the object of the hatred of the bourgeoisie, whom the inflationism has impoverished, not less than of the proletariat. As the inflation proceeds and the real value of the currency fluctuates wildly from month to month, all permanent relations between debtors and creditors, which form the ultimate foundation of capitalism, become so utterly disordered as to be almost meaningless; and the process of wealth-getting degenerates into a gamble and a lottery.
Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of Society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
Taken from John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace" (1919)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Firstly, why is it a treat for the BBC to have thirteen minutes of it's Moscow correspondent's time? They pay him a good salary to hear from him!
And then, it is actually funny, it's laughable to hear Mr Rosenberg besmirching the Russian media for their state-leaning bias, from his position in the British establishment's premier mouthpiece. When did we last hear anything at the BBC that challenges the stock Western narrative {now sent spinning by its prominent component part, yet desperately clung-to by the deflated European page-boys}?
Lucy Hockings assures us that the only word on casualty figures we have comes from Ukraine, who tell us 'so much more'. Rather tellingly, she chooses not to avail the audience of those figures. There follows much description of the tell-tale signs of Russian loss of life - yet puzzlingly, nothing of those on the Ukrainian side, which we are assured, 'tell us so much more'?
The Russian economy is portrayed yet again as being in dire straits. It actually grew faster than any Western economy last year. Ah but, we are told, the prices in Russia are rising. Do these people even do their own shopping/pay their own bills? Can't they see for themselves that things are not doing too well here at home? The economy that actually is imploding is that of Germany, the business model of which was blown up somewhere beneath the Baltic Sea - by half a dozen sub aqua divers having a lark.
Honestly, if this is all the BBC can muster, with all of its £££billions of state-sponsored money, it is about time they got out of the game. This is baleful dross.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
All schools should make sure that young people are made aware of the legal status of bank balances. In the interest of making that an aim, I am fully on-board with the general line in this video.
I would take issue with the statement toward the end, that "...there is no such thing as money in the world these days." There actually is money in this world, and it is gold. That is why it does us no good at all when we talk of money, to fail to distinguish between the notes and coins we use daily - which are actually units of currency - and money, which is gold.
Because our pounds have existed in the form they have - as fiat currency (backed with nothing tangible and only of value because the authorities deem it to be so) - for all of our lives and those of our parents, we have formed the mistaken idea that this is how it has always been and there are no alternatives. Up until 1913 there was an alternative system which was backed by tangible wealth: gold.
This subject is especially crucial at this juncture, as the fiat, debt-driven system we know, is coming to the end of its usefulness and will be replaced by another way of doing things, the details of which we don't yet know. We can only look on what is happening in the world and surmise the possibilities. When we watch the flailings of so many central banks in the West, presiding over their, at best moribund economies; and we compare that with the steady progress of those countries outside the West, this would suggest that the levers of power are changing hands. Given that so many of the latter have been assiduously acquiring and laying-down stores of gold for some time now, it would be prudent to assume that any new system will be based at least in part, on a return to the use of gold as a tangible basis for measuring wealth and trading exchange.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.
It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, addressing the United States Bankers' Association, New York, 1924.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.
It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, addressing the United States Bankers' Association, New York, 1924.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There was one issue during your lifetime, Rod, which beyond all others, required your superb polemic talent. There was a time, back in the early summer of 2020, when there was still a chance of stopping this horrendous assault on our freedom and on our way of life.
You decided, not only to not show up; you chose to aid and abet the powers that were so clearly on a mission to destroy our economy, using the excuse of what was even then, a middling viral outbreak that posed no threat to the massive majority of people. When it was clear to any informed mind that we were being duped on a scale never before experienced, you busied yourself writing music reviews for the Spectator.
"What did you do before global, brutal, totalitarian rule, Daddy"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
All valid points, very well stated.
So was it China or Russia who shut down the economies that feed us, and allowed our government - in concert with so many others - to use the excuse of a middle-ranking coronavyrus to introduce legislation on the sly, that takes away our freedom? The behavioural psychologists who put so many people into the state of trauma that grips so many still and leaves them primed for further instant herding: were they sent from Moscow and Beijing to bend and cower the Western mind?
Was it some external power that instructed the US Fed', the Bank of England, the ECB and others to simply flood western economies with trillions of $£€ etc, such that the wages, savings and pensions of the low and middle waged are denuded and they are forced onto the cattle truck towards subsistence and the total compliance that comes with being made to have nothing?
It is the people in Biden's administration who are doing this; Johnson's, Von der Leyen's, Trudeau's; along with all the others who purport to stand up for Western liberty. Our own elected representatives are set to the task of tearing-down what the West has built. They are doing this through the systematic ruination of the very idea of the sovereign individual, and of the personal incentive to thrive by trading - core elements of the success of Western Civilisation.
So why does the Spectator choose to leave all of this undiscussed? Why is no-one writing at the magazine, about what is being done to us directly, by those elected to govern the West? Yes, the MSM and academia are truly in on it in that wider, amorphous sense, but the actual day-to-day levers which are sending us to our absolute ruin are in the hands of named persons. The names and their actions are not being called-out.
1
-
Set-up by a Nazi and that same Montagu Norman whose motives might be gleaned from the following?
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.
It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, addressing the United States Bankers' Association, New York, 1924.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Dr Vad raises some points that offer hope, but in certain passages he seems rather conflicted and at times, palpably fearful of airing his fuller views.
He speaks of the Ukraine conflict, likening it to the brinkmanship around the siting of Russian missiles in Cuba in violation of the Monroe Doctrine. He omits to mention the fact that Russia was seeking to secure the removal of the squadron of Jupiter missiles that had recently been sited in Turkey, giving the US a huge pre-emptive strike capability over the then USSR.
The claim is made that it is a mystery as to the perpetrators of the Nordstream destruction. In his position he really has to know who carried-out that operation and that this has led to the crippling of German industry. The absence of any urgency in coming to a finding on this matter is astounding.
The Ukraine war, he portrays more than once, as a given, as being started by Russia in February 2022. Yet he states clearly that the preceding decades saw NATO advancing aggressively closer to the Russian border. The whole Maidan coup and the installation of a pro-Western regime and the consequent moves toward Ukrainian membership were all tantamount to provocation, leaving Russia having exhausted its repeated efforts to make the West see sense.
As a former high-ranking officer and his now advisory status, he is to be respected. However, his seemingly total acceptance of the actions of 'the closest ally' of Germany and the resultant mounting catastrophe, is bewildering. He and his fellow countrymen really do need to heed the words of Lord Ismay, given on the NATO official website, outlining the fundamental purpose of the organisation; it was, he said, "To keep the Americans in, the Soviets out and the Germans down."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Not the old "...could be underwater in the next 30 years" line again? Could be, why? Due to what precisely?
It's always the same with these people, it's become their religious guiding light: they issue their periodic dread forecasts that somehow get forgotten so that new dread warnings can be put in their place when the old ones don't show up. Meanwhile, anyone can go to the place on the coast that they visited fifty years ago, to find that everything is just as it was. Rivers flood, as they always have, onto predictable places, flat, low plains - that's why they were named in history: "flood plains". This can be exacerbated if waterways are no longer dredged due to either regulations or budget cuts; both of which have been a factor in recent flooding episodes.
The 'climate change' movement is a political move to hamper certain countries while others are left to do as they see fit. Why, for instance, if carbon emissions were the catastrophic factor they are made out to be, is the UK so harried to restrict output when it produces less than 1% of the global output; at the same time as China produces a new coal-fired power station every week? India shows a similar disregard for the concerns that have the UK's industries in tethers. Would it not make sense to focus on the most egregious offenders?
Our entire economy is being torn down, made ineffective, on no more evidence than the aggregated "could be" ism of so many who are not looking at the hard evidence.
1
-
1
-
This is so much glossy bollocks.
If 'most economists' argued for the US to have a central bank, then why did it have to be drawn-up in secret, by a select few, on a secluded island? If that isn't a scenario to be fairly described as a conspiracy, then the word has pretty much been made obsolete.
Are 'most economists' pleased with the fact that, since the inception of the Federal Reserve, Americans have witnessed - been subjected to - a continuing cycle of boom and bust? Look around you now and ask yourself if the US economy is being steered in a good direction? Are the American people being served well by the system supported by 'most economists'? If these people are charged with the well-being of Americans, and they have been doing that job now for 113 years, and to such poor results, isn't it time to replace them and their system with something else?
The whole pile of the central bank system is based on debt that must not be paid-off. It operates on usury, the demands of which are boundless. The Fed' is run on behalf not of the American people but in order to maximise returns to private shareholders of what is a small collection of immensely wealthy banks - most of them foreign-owned.
Whenever a nation has managed to free itself from the strictures of a central bank, it rapidly prospers. Look back at those leaders who have striven for such freedom, and see how they ended-up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Michael Clarke has proved himself to be a very unreliable source from which to seek expert advice on this situation. With this offering however, he further shows himself clearly as the chancer he truly is. His tactic is to throw around a few impressive technical facts so as to give himself a semblance of gravity; and then, on the back of that, to go on to make exorbitant claims based on his particular imaginings and very obvious leanings. Here he tries to downplay the significance of the Oreshnik strike on Dnipro, by lumping this totally new missile and what it poses to NATO, together with delivery systems which are different entirely in capabilities; they are not in the same category. In his contorted neglect of this, in his lame need to score petty points, the momentous development in the situation entirely escapes him.
The 'movement on the battlefield' to which he refers, has been overwhelmingly in favour of Russian forces for a long time now, and this movement is accelerating steadily as their greater strength takes its toll of a beleaguered opposition. Clarke's studio map presentations are few and far between these days, but perhaps he should be brought back in to show how far the lines have been shifted.
Clarke further shows that he is host to the rabid Russophobia that has infested the whole of the Western MSM. He portrays a Russia that is not to be trusted in the establishment of any agreement. The truth is that it is the West has made assurances to Russia, which not only have been subsequently broken, but have been recognised by the admission of the Western leaders involved, to have been deliberate ploys used in order to build forces in order to more effectively attack Russia.
The Russians do not want the whole of Ukraine. Their political leaders have neither said so, nor have they written so. They want security for their country and that is threatened by the NATO involvement in Ukraine. They will take the steps required to gain that security. This war has been imposed on them, and could be brought to its end by the cessation of the Western advances, the designs of which were initiated by the Clinton administration and have been carried-on ever since.
We can only hope that our calamitous predicament will not remain on the present course; that sense will be knocked into the heads of the Western Neocon desires - that they will be driven from the field by the realities of emerging world power, and that the craven foolishness purveyed by 'experts' is finally shown the door.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Another fence-sitter - well-meaning but basically incapable of understanding the level of threat we face.
She refers to 'a way out' of our predicament. There is to be no way out. The main purpose of our continued lockdown is to bleed the money out of our small/medium business sector. The workforce will be put on welfare, and the very idea of capitalist, free-enterprise will be done away with.
As for 'conspiracy theories': that phrase is deliberately put against anyone who casts suspicion over who and what might be behind all of this.
We don't have to look far, as it is a freely aired proclamation of the WEF founder and leader, Prof' Klaus Schwab, that "...the pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, re-imagine and reset our world". (All that suffering; a rare opportunity - classy)
Schwab elsewhere assures us that "In 2030 you will own nothing, and you will be happy".
All of this has been planned for many years, initially in secret but more recently made freely available to all.
If Julia Hartley-Brewer is as concerned as she says she is, then why, as a professional journalist, is she not looking into this area for answers; and why is she not making this known to the public?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That's exactly how banks create currency, not money. Gold is money, and to insist there are no distinctive qualities that separate the two, is to play the fiat game that is robbing people blind.
One of the fundamental qualities of a viable system of trading is that it is rested on a means of exchange which provides in addition, facility as a store of wealth. Fiat currency can be a reliable store of wealth in certain conditions - we happen to be living during a stage of our fiat currency in which it has lost its ability to store wealth. It is being steadily debauched such that every pound in our wages/savings/pensions can no longer buy what it could last year; in another year's time it will buy even less. The stealthiest tax of all. Put another way, the ordinary person is being relieved of his wealth by immaculately-suited pirates while he/she stands dutifully to attention, pipes them on board and hands them the key to the ship's safe.
If gold has no inherent value, why are the treasury departments of so many countries buying it by the ton? Well, because it is indeed security that a debt will be paid; and the countries buying gold look at a global reserve currency system that severed all ties to such security on August 15th 1971 and, since being unleashed, has gone through its debauchery phases, as the man said, 'slowly at first...' and now we are approaching its '...and then all at once' phase.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The lockdowns were from the outset, a method, designed for the specific purpose of keeping small/medium sized traders from their customers.
In order to get the public to go along with lockdown, they had to be made scared - so the simple korona vyrus was got-up by the media and authorities, to look like it was ebola on steroids. As a result, we all went a bit bonkers for varying lengths of time before we came to the realisation that the whole thing was a scam and the people who are supposed to serve us had had our pants down.
The bigger the city, the longer it seems to take people to come to their senses. Judging by the amount of people still wearing the chin-hammock and still wittering about 'the next time', NYC seems to be still in the grip of the fear-mongers.
The way to fix NY and the world, is to wake up, try scrape some balls and backbone together, and realise that the MSM is owned by sociopaths who in truth despise the ordinary, low-paid people they purport to defend, and will not allow you to have your life back as long as they have the power.
1
-
We came to within a one inch bullet trajectory error of having the election prospects of the Democrats being put very much in the ascendent, more than likely to be returned in the ensuing trauma. Had that come about, then rest assured, Brianna Wu would have now been ready to push ahead with the travesty; this process of introspection would, in all the renewed exhilaration, simply never have turned-up.
She shows herself to be clueless on the economy and totally ignorant of the causes of the Ukrainian conflict; mired in Western myopia and Russophobic assumption.
She's right in that the Democrats are totally won over to and directed by the elites. The disaster is that the only antidote available turns out to be Trump and his team selection of dedicated hawks. Turns out the only way the American people could vote, was Neocon. We never, ever look in the direction we should. The wars are to be carried-on; our descent into penury progressed.
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.
It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, addressing the United States Bankers' Association, New York, 1924.
1
-
1
-
1
-
"...life expectancy, in poor places, is falling, and covid helped things along a lot..." What's helping life expectancy to fall now, almost five years after the outbreak, is the reaction to covid. The criminal, unnecessary and hugely damaging lockdowns and the continuing dispensation of the experimental mRNA medications. This needs to be recognised fully.
In Mr Collier we have yet another very intelligent and fair-minded observer who leaves the crucial realisations unattended. In his outline of the incestuous workings of Whitehall in general and of the Treasury in particular, Mr Collier points us to a crucial flaw in the way the nation is guided; at the end of all this he seems incredulous as to how this has been put in place by people whose job it is to tend to the welfare of the people. He is astounded by the fact that this allowed to continue.
What needs to be understood is that none of this is regarded by the establishment as in any way falling short of their mission - that mission is not in any way aligned with that of anyone who seeks the improvement of the lot of the British people. To those who are in charge, it is well that the people become poorer and ever more dependent. Economically comfortable people will not do as they are told. A much reduced populace is the goal. The poor, the cold and the hungry will jump to every order.
As long as we remain bewildered by incompetence we are not grasping the reality: this is far from bungling; this is systematic demolition, increment by plausible increment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"...we didn't know how contagious it [covid] was..."
We knew how contagious and how dangerous it was BEFORE the first lockdown. One of the instances that illustrated the danger the virus posed was the Diamond Princess cruise ship, which showed that this was no Black Death event as portrayed by the world's media.
Yet we still were locked down. Society was brought to a halt; small and medium businesses were in effect prohibited from their customers, while global corporations carried-on. People were forbidden from working. Businesses were halted - many were closed permanently. All were damaged. The money was printed to the tune of hundreds of billions of pounds; and the inflation cake was baked.
The nation was for many months, effectively governed by SAGE, a collection of science specialists - but who selected them and why, until weeks into the outbreak of a virus, was there not one virologist nor one epidemiologist within its ranks? Why, in their absence, was there a whole team of 'behavioural psychologists' included, whose specialist skills lay in the field of traumatising people into obedience?
Why did Boris Johnson go along with all of this, the greatest crime in history?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.
It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, addressing the United States Bankers' Association, New York, 1924.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Capital must protect itself in every possible way, both by combination and legislation. Debts must be collected, mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes, they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers. These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in forming an imperialism to govern the world.
By dividing the voters through the political party system, we can get them to expend their energies in fighting for questions of no importance.
It is thus, by discrete action, we can ensure for ourselves that which has been so well planned and so successfully accomplished."
Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, addressing the United States Bankers' Association, New York, 1924.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nothing here to tell us how Russia 'is not winning'. Yet clearly stated is the fact that they have the initiative. Lots about new developments in drone technology. Why? Whatever our drones do, the Russians will probably do a bit better and in far greater number.
"...Kiev's forces appear to be on the back foot..." This is the famed British understatement is it?
"...of course, investment in a multi-layered, defensive line takes time..." Indeed it does, and it did. The defences of Mariupol, Bakhmut, Avdiivka and others, took years to devise and construct. Now that they are gone, any new and hastily prepared positions will be that much easier to overcome.
"Western armies see it very differently" Yes they do. They see it on screens hundreds of miles away in safe, comfortable ops rooms and in messes. Good way to fight a war: letting other people do the dying, or as US Sen' Lynsey Graham stated, and David Cameron more recently parroted, sending money to Ukraine is great value - we just print and send; they go forward, without air cover, and get torn apart. Has there ever been a more disgusting admission of venality and cowardice? Bring him a flipchart somebody please?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Firstly, this channel, along with so many others, keeps playing Big pharma's game from the outset, by referring to mRNA treatments as 'vaccines'. We need to discriminate between the two because they work in very different ways; one of them having gained a many decades record of safety, while the other is still very much in the experimental phase.
They are both injected into the arm, and that's where the similarity ends. So why do we grant to mRNA injections, the claim to the name 'vaccine'? Is an injection of heroin into the arm, a vaccine?
The other point on this matter that no-one seems to consider when looking for reasons to explain the decline in deaths from various pathogens, is the huge improvement in diet and consequent physical condition. Thos who avoid over-eating and who seek a healthy diet have had increasing access throughout the last century, to all the essentials that were not available prior to that time. Our bodies are in a condition to fend off disease more capably than our ancestors.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Prof' Schwab's prophecy for 2030 which is referred to in the title here, is one which sends a chill up my spine. We all know where all that is coming from and where it ultimately ends. I detest communism and the totalitarian measures which have to be installed to keep it in place.
I love the freedom that free-enterprise affords me, even though my own personal success and achievement have not been massive. The chance is there always, for me to better myself.
Here though is the weakness right now, and the whole 'new normal' brigade seek to capitalise (!) on it: there are now vast swathes of young people who don't own anything. They don't earn enough to be able to set their sights on owning anything in the future. We have somehow allowed crony capitalism to pose as true capitalism and this has locked too many young people out in the cold. For them, the numbers no longer stack up.
When they hear what is for me, that dread premonition of Schwab's, there is for them no fear of loss. If they don't own anything now, then the 'happiness' promised is going to cost them nothing. They will see nothing wrong in going for it. (Yes I know, there is no mention from Schwab of the massive restrictions that will be imposed and the loss of freedom - but they would leave that out wouldn't they?)
We, the defenders of capitalism and free-enterprise, need to find a way back to having young people own stuff and be in on things. Or it's a communist future for all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
(Sorry for my not speaking Dutch)
Just watched the rugby this weekend. So, there are two teams of fifteen men out there on the pitch for eighty minutes, rolling and grappling; tightly packed in scrums, sweat and blood all over the place; 'social distancing' it is not. No masks - how could there be?
Then the camera cuts to a shot of the coach way up in the stands in a glass box, sat all on his own, with a bloody stupid 'look at me' face covering? And the video adjudicator, again on his own, wearing his worthless doomkerchief.
Even the injured players who sit at the edge of the pitch way away from anyone. Again, the mask.
These people are being told they must wear these stupid things surely. They are being used like so many others, to spread the lie that 'death is all around us, waiting to take anyone'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So these 'swarms of drones' have managed, despite the best efforts of the RAF and the USAF, to evade all countermeasures so that not one example has been shot down or otherwise acquired, and there is no evidence that they are anything to do with Russia.
How are we - and more pertinently, the Russians - to know that the Aegis missile installations have only a defensive capability? The naval version can be configured to act defensively, taking down incoming missiles; but also offensively to target enemy ships. It would surely be possible to have a similarly alternating role so that the Polish Aegis missiles could be used to target deep into Russia in a pre-emptive decapitation strike? Perhaps understandable then, that the Russians would regard these installations as a threat. Imagine if Russia or China were to cut a deal with Mexico or Canada, to site such systems close to the US border - how would that be greeted? In fact how did the US react when Russia set about putting missiles on Cuba, in retaliation for the US's Jupiter missiles being sited in Turkey?
It was precisely to guard itself from foreign aggression (basically from Europeans - in the main Britain) that the US very wisely adopted the Monroe Doctrine which, since 1832 has forbidden any threat in the hemisphere of US territory. Yet, that same concern for security, when displayed by Russia, is labelled in the Western MSM as 'Russian Imperialism'. Why the huge imbalance?
The whole point of this discussion seems to have been to throw a towel over the Dnipro Oreshnik strike - given mention yes, but made out to be no big deal. The truth is that with the Oreshnik, NATO finds itself presented with a whole new weapon category to deal with. The Russians have shown that they are in possession of something that gives them the ability to cause damage that previously would require the use of nuclear missiles. Combining extreme accuracy, hypersonic speed and devastating destructive yield, the Oreshnik opens up new possibilities and is not to be dismissed as readily as our BBC expert would suggest.
1
-
1
-
1