Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Will the Right Win the European Parliamentary Election?" video.

  1. Only a very small group on the far left would want to elect such revolutionary social ists.
    2
  2. "Fasci sm left unscrutinised again" Fas cism is not a thing and hasn't been a thing since the WW2 era, hun.
    2
  3.  @adammarx123 : Fas cists were far-left socia lists, hun.
    2
  4. It's not rocket science people. Read some books for crying out loud. If you want it simple: Far-right ideologies advocate for Classical Liberalism. Far-left ideologies advocate for collectivism and socialism. Going to the right from Center, you can see ideologies such as Republicanism. Going to the left from Center, you can see ideologies such as Social-Democracy. Extreme right would be Anarcho-Capitalism. Extreme left would be Communism.
    1
  5. Far-right hasn't been a thing in either Germany nor Italy.
    1
  6.  @user-rh3pe7um8d : "What do Hi tler and Muss olini have to do with this debate?" I guess some low IQ sm ooth bra ins think that those two 3rd position socia lists were somehow "right wingers" just because they opposed marx ism.
    1
  7. "(neoza nists and neofas cists)." They are far-left, hun.
    1
  8. @@James__Smith : No. Nothing to do with right wing of any kind whatsoever.
    1
  9. @@James__Smith The have nothing in common. It is the extreme right and extreme left that has one thing in common, that being Anarchy.
    1
  10.  mr-andrew  : Fas cism has not been a thing since the W W2 era, hun.
    1
  11.  @user-df1ns1ob8y  "Fascism is (unfortunately) far from dead, hun." Fascism is dead, but few countries still have Neo-Fascism.
    1
  12.  @adammarx123  : You just have no clue what you are talking about.
    1
  13.  @adammarx123  "how fasc ists are far-left out of the sudden?" They always were far-left, since fascis m was a socia list ideology based on national syndicalism adapted from Georges Sorel. The idea was that society would be consolidated (i.e., incorporated) into syndicates (in the Italian context, fascio/fasci) which would be regulated by and serve as organs for the state, or "embody" the state (corpus = body). The purpose was the centralization and synchronization of society under the state, as an end unto itself. To quote Mussolini's infamous aphorism: "All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state."
    1
  14. Far-right has never been a thing in either country.
    1