Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "Would You Have Been a Nazi?" video.
-
@jjdelft3216 : You have no clue what you are talking about. Both Italian fas cis ts and German's national soc ialis ts were ha rd co re so cial ists. Both opposed liberal ca pital ism, but also int ernatio nal soc iali sm, hence the concept of a “third way,” their centralized economic policies obeyed collectivist and so ciali st principles, openly opposing cap itali sm and the free market, favoring nationalism and auta rchy.
Mussolini was always a so ciali st, but after getting kicked out from the PSI due to wanting Italy be part of the war effort, he moved more into Sore lian syndi calis m.
Adolf was always a so cia list also, in fact, during 1919 he was part of a m arx ist movement before getting arrested and writing his book.
Adolf constantly called himself a so cia list and their party was called National soc iali sm because that's what it was, soc ialis m but national.
"We might have called ourselves the Liberal Party. We chose to call ourselves the National Soci alis ts. We are not internationalists. Our so ciali sm is national. We demand the fulfilment of the just claims of the productive classes by the state on the basis of race solidarity. To us state and race are one."
"Soc ial ism, is the science of dealing with the common weal. Co mmun ism is not So cialis m. Mar xis m is not So ciali sm. The Mar xia ns have stolen the term and confused its meaning. I shall take So ciali sm away from the So cialis ts."
2
-
1
-
1
-
1