Comments by "Historia, Magistra Vitae" (@Historia.Magistra.Vitae.) on "The Nazi's Grasp for Power | Germany's Fatal Attraction: Part 2 | Free Documentary History" video.

@gildedhydra2907 : There is no parallels. You are conf used.
2
@m.r4841 "It was never a so ciali st party" Incorrect. In NS DAP 25 program manif esto, most of the points were soci ali sm and NS DAP advocated for so cialis m in the first place.
2
@m.r4841 "The party has always had extre me rig ht wi ng and fas cist ideas. That's why he joined" Incorrect. There was no fas cism in Na zi Germ any. They were national so cialis ts, not fa scis ts. And also fa r-le ft. The fundamental diff erences between left-wi ng and right-wing ideologies center around the the rights of indiv iduals vs. the power of the government. Le ft-wi ng beliefs are libe ral in that they believe society is best served with an expanded role for the gover nment. People on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount and the role — and especially the power — of the gover nment is mini mized.
2
@m.r4841 : You need to co pe har der than that.
2
@m.r4841 "Easy. They're not so cial is ts." Except they certa inly were so cial ists.
1
@m.r4841 "It was never soci alist. It is indeed extre me righ t wi ng" Incorrect. In NS DAP 25 program manif esto, most of the points were soci ali sm and NS DAP advocated for so cialis m in the first place. And also they were fa r-le ft.The fundamental diff erences between left-wi ng and right-wing ideologies center around the the rights of indiv iduals vs. the power of the government. Le ft-wi ng beliefs are libe ral in that they believe society is best served with an expanded role for the gover nment. People on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount and the role — and especially the power — of the gover nment is mini mized.
1
@m.r4841 "You are wro ng. They were extr eme rig ht wi ng." Incorrect. Natio nal soc ialis m was a tota litari an fa r-le ft, so cial ist ideol ogy. The funda mental differences between le ft-win g and rig ht-win g ideologies center around the the rights of individuals vs. the power of the govern ment. Le ft-wi ng beliefs are libe ral in that they believe society is best served with an expanded role for the govern ment. People on the right believe that the best outc ome for socie ty is achieved when indiv idual rights and civil liber ties are param ount and the role — and especially the power — of the gov ernment is minimized.
1