Comments by "" (@neocortex8198) on "Why Migration Can't Solve The Birth Rate Crisis" video.

im all for open borders but we really need to ban retirement for anyone with under 3 kids and punish "childless or 1 kid unemployment" for anyone over 50 with a military draft
16
me who supports open borders but supports essentially a retirement ban at least for anyone without 3+ kids
15
we should tax anyone without kids more especially after 40
13
@dragonmartijn not my problemo, people without kids especially retirees should get nothing
13
my stance is ban possession of birth control pills and devices
9
migrants arent taking money out on average, its retirees exploiting immigrants , its time for young pride worldwide
7
we need like 200k loan forgiveness per child and raising the retirement age and banning unemployment for those with under 3 kids
6
@kaiserbauch9092 its obvious to me which is why i support militantly pro natalist policies while also generally being pro immigration. if you compare countries in africa with and without state pensions the countries without pensions have on average 2 more children. The most important thing we can do is ban retirement for childless folks and ban medical care for SELF inflicted diseases (cancer from smoking/drinking/obesity/drug use, being shot while committing a crime)
5
multiculturalism is better than the death of a society. Screw societal uniqueness you guys have 8 million open homes. Maybe japan needs to raise their retirement age from 50 to 85 or 90... and tax the childless and implement loan forgiveness of like 150k usd per child
4
@bjarke7886 no
4
honestly the solution is to immediately abolish pensions for anyone with under 3 kids overnight, implement a military draft for anyone over 50 who isnt working with under 2 kids. I wouldnt be against labeling refusing to work TREASON. also we should lower the working age to at least 8 if not 5 that way its once again profitable to have kids. Its essential to have a revolution against the elderly for their exploitation of the young and immigrants
3
@JSK010 whats wrong with people avoiding paying into pensions because they rather have kids than pay taxes? im fine with illegals using public healthcare for childbirth im just not fine with anyone without children receiving any kind of retirement benefits . Anyone over 50 that is unemployed should be drafted into the army and should be forced to fight in war at least anyone with less than 3 kids, generally speaking i still think even for 4 kids the retirement age should be at least 75 if not 80 and id argue that for the childless retirement should be TREASON i dont think we should have pensions essentially at least not in a way to reward people for having at least 3 or even 4 kids. Its dumb to socialize the benefits of having kids (being taken care of in old age)
3
@BlueinRhapsody listen if open borders helps prevent collapse how about we combine open borders with hardline natalist policies... like the death penalty for infidelity, spousal abuse, military desertion of anyone drafted into the army (draft everyone over 50 without a job or 3 kids) , 150-250k loan forgiveness for housing, enterprise or college per child... honestly instead of spending money on seniors lets spend money on parents
3
@Libertarianmobius1 anyone who refuses to work due to age or disability is a traitor. But by and large we should be having treason trials for nursing home patients and mandate employment it should be mandatory to work from the age of 10 until death outside of maternity and paternity leave there just isnt an excuse. Honestly i think im more angry at dementia patients and tards than literally anyone else
2
@sirsurnamethefirstofhisnam7986 its called priorities and solutions also old folks really need to stop oppressing the young so thats what i want done
2
@JSK010 if i have to pick between feeding my kids (when i have kids) and paying social security taxes im picking feeding my kids dont care at all its called priorities
2
ill be honest i support the use of the death penalty for elective abortion. i support universal pregnancy care, by and large for the most part medical costs for 95% of children are so comically low its a non issue the real issue is ironically for most of the pro life movement the elderly. we spend 3-4 x more on them then children. every country without pensions has a birth rate +2 those that dont of the same demographic. I also wouldnt be against a loan forgiveness of 100-200k per child which can be used for permanent housing, emergency medical care, college, starting a company the most important thing is to maximize the amount of children. Honestly a lot of us do care about society but the problem is a lot of us put the elderly before the young and the reality is that we have to put young people first. We have to require companies wherever possible to allow work from home/maternal leave and use the axe as the punishment for anyone that breaks the law for these approaches. "adequate medical care" mostly just means abortion on demand allowing legal abortion in any case other than life of the mother is an abomination and will along with child labor laws and public pensions lead to population collapse. Were all human beings shouldnt civil rights apply to the unborn too... heck i say the same thing about immigrants to Trump folks. If our beliefs can prevent the collapse of our civlization so be it they should be forced
2
@istvanpeterkovacs730 "Hungarian pays 18.5% of his gross salary for public pension and health care. In addition, Hungarians also pay 15% tax on their gross income, with the exception of mothers with four children, who no longer have to pay this public burden. So, a mother with two or even three children pays 33.5% public tax after the periodical discount ends for her no adult children. Do you think that's generous? How much tax and contribution do you have to pay from your income? Let's not forget that the Hungarian government has spent less and less money for social care and education. Only in the last ten years have these public services deteriorated." 20% of ones income for health and pensions... heres the catch in the states its 10% honestly abolish all state pensions and elder care and raise the retirement age to at least 85 for anyone with under 4 kids. That 20% that goes to pensions would be much better off going to kids instead of boomers
2
i support banning retirement for anyone with under 3 and enforcing that ban with the military draft or treason
2
@indianboy59 i think the solution is a mix of open borders and hardline absolutist natalist policies to make sure that people whom dont have kids have a miserable life if they refuse to work especially
2
@AutismaMagna the rest of my comment was about requiring old people to work until the day they die unless they had 4+ kids and a very militant solution on how to increase birth rates. Immigration isnt the problem pensions and birthrates are
2
@bristoled93 not my problem we shouldnt subsidize people like you if you arent willing to have a family you should be expected to just keep working
2
@bristoled93 id back a 70% wealth tax on the unemployed on all wealth over 50k USD... with it going down by 20% per child once someone hits 70
2
@IvyANguyen my issue is that current seniors are living lives of luxury at our expense im furious that what we need to survive is instead being spent on frivolities by them. If we want a future they must be pushed into the workforce now so that future generations dont have to suffer we have to stop propping up the past at the expense of the future
2
@IvyANguyen the current seniors of the boomer generation's luxury is paid for by the labor and work of younger people the entire reason why young people are struggling is because the government barely taxes investments of retirees and barely taxes income and property owned by retirees. Large established companies have pensions which they pay out to their retirees and same with the government, this always no matter what comes at the expense of younger people the government spends near half its budget on pension related programs as well as the interest in debt and almost nothing on the young. The priority of governments are elderly folks not young folks. Honestly this is why i support the idea of a wealth tax on anyone unemployed over 40 per se you just have old people hogging all the resources and they just spend it on medical care which spikes medical prices for young people. Last time i checked taking care of dementia patients is a burden while paying for maternity care actually benefits society in the long term
2
@MilanJovisic-pv9uy abolish welfare for the elderly
1
@kaiserbauch9092 why not just ban retirement for anyone with under 3 kids? maybe pensions higher for 4 or 5 kids. Bu id argue anyone with 1 or no kids should be entirely cut off and the childless should straight up be prosecuted for retiring
1
a death penalty abortion ban would end legal abortion a retirement ban for anyone with under 3 kids would help, anyone under 50 without 3 kids who refuses to work should be drafted and anyone who cant walk and doesnt have at least 3 kids is a traitor im all for open borders the young should overthrow the elderly, countries without pensions have +2 more kids on average, we should ban retirement even require people by law to work at least if they have under 4 kids we should spend at least double the amount of money on kids than we do seniors we are dealing with the extinction of our civilization ANY means necessary to resist this must be done no matter the cost also 200k in loan forgiveness per child adjusted for inflation
1
the solution is a revolution against the elderly
1
theres a solution. for anyone refusing to work for anyone with under 3 kids over the age of 50, or 2 kids over 40 use the military draft as a punishment ... the reality is we will likely need to ban retirement and institute 200k loan forgiveness per child among other things
1
@mangolemon4117 honestly there are a few underlying issues the retirement age should at minimum be 80 and be pinned to max life expectancy +3-5 and there also should be the requirement that all people without 3 or more kids or kids under 5 over the age of 12 should be required by law to be employed. the us government spends around 40% of its budget on retirees and around 10% on interest of those debts , retirees alone will be around 50% of the budget by 2030. Its just not sustainable to socialize the benefits of having kids (whether by public or private pensions) while allowing every aspect of having them to skyrocket in price that being said i support a death penalty abortion ban with a life of the mother exception. we need to rethink housing and extensively deregulate both housing and labor, banning communities from banning kids, pets. A nationwide ban on exclusionary zoning, a death penalty for the enforcement of frivolous zoning laws. Abolishing public and private pensions and requiring profits to either go into expanding companies or to CURRENT employees or buy out other companies. We must do everything possible to increase the amount of kids being born, we must abolish child labor laws because if kids were able to work they would be a boon in the economy earlier and people would have kids specifically because their profitable to have
1
@mangolemon4117 honestly if you get rid of all child labor laws and public pensions and implemented a mix of work from home or paternity/maternity leave as well as trying to get young parents work from home jobs while relying on children people and seniors to do jobs that require in person work. Banning private pensions might also help people physically unable to work should generally have to rely on their kids and if they dont have kids that is their problem young people should seize control of society so we actually have a future
1
@mangolemon4117 the point is to make it painful to not have kids thats the entire point of the move. Civilization will end unless people have more kids so the approach is to punish them if they dont i mean generally most people could in a vaccum work until those ages however a lot of people are also obese, smokers, alchohalics etc. Why should the government give the screw ups an easier life at the expense of those whom took care of their duties. Why should those with children who have contributed to having future generations subsidize those that didnt? These measures yes are harsh but when pensions were created average life expectancy was generally slightly lower than the retirement age. Huge companies often have generous pensions often by law and these pensions eat away at money that could go to workers. The true reality of the situation is that harsh changes are a necessity maybe instead of revolting in service of the retirees that soak up half of all government resources and live off obnoxiously high home prices as their benefit. Why the hell arent we prioritizing children over boomers why the hell arent we putting the safety and economic freedom of young mothers and fathers over their parents and grandparents. Why are young men and women sent to die while retirees just sit back in their rocking chairs.
1
@mangolemon4117 also the idea of a "childless spaces" tax is important that along with reforms where couples and siblings could do 2 for 1 deals with colleges. The reality is that there needs to be much more incentives to have kids. Im an only child why the hell should i be expected to take care of my parents in old age 2 to 1? My priority is my own kids once i have them not them
1
@sullathehutt7720 theres already i war in ukraine just send the childless retirees there, and also send retirees with one or two kids if they dont get the memo
1
@dylangtech in theory theres another idea i support, for couples that WORK together HALF their income taxes especially if its WFH and they have kids, honestly abolishing social security and Medicare are the much bigger issues, i dont think women in the workforce is an entirely bad idea but i am of the conclusion that any kind of aid or scholarships for colleges for both men and women should only be for parents of young children and nobody else. Banning government funding of education for the childless post high school is something id support
1
@5831a no absolutely not , you see were not having a shortage of smokers, drinkers, alcoholics obese but children ideally we probably should move to alternative education methods. How old are you now? The most important thing in society is for the old to serve the young and to make a better life for the future. Also i support the abolition of social security/all old age benefits and anyone without 3+ kids should be banned from retiring . For childless retirees id support treason trials
1
@Hardcore_Remixer i mean it would benefit young people to end social security overnight, around 2/3 of all taxes go to social programs so the average person's wages would increase by 20%. Young people would probably stay because the taxes would be low enough where they would benefit, id be forcing retirees to work ideally. Also screw elections they just overcomplicate things and contribute to the old exploiting the young.
1
im all for open borders but we need to ban retirement (and punish it with the draft for anyone over 50, if they cant walk its treason) for anyone with under 3 kids... also childless taxes, double taxes on all property without a resident under 30 per amount of square foot do the same thing for under 40 but make it 3x... tax the unemployed and retired earnings through investments at 75%. Implement loan forgiveness at 50k per child... heck maybe even 200k per child which is the cost of having a kid in the usa
1
raise taxes on elderly investments especially for those that dont work.
1
@kaiserbauch9092 i dont think Hungary goes far enough, if im not mistaken they still have generous pensions, i dont think theres a way forward outside of banning retirement for anyone with at least under 2 kids if not 3 kids
1
i want to start this by saying i believe mass immigration while its just a band aid is a good thing the real solution is to abolish public pensions and legalize or even mandate child labor starting from the age of 5 the simple solution would be to make retirement something earned through having more children. The more kids someone has the earlier they should be ALLOWED to retire, pensions if they should exist at all should only be given to anyone over that barrier by 10 years. the childless retirement age for benefits should be 100, the legal age for retiring (being allowed to not work) should be 90 retirement age for benefits with one child should be 90 with a legal retirement age of 85 retirement age for benefits with two children should be 85 with a legal retirement age 80 retirement age for benefits with three children should be 75 with a legal retirement age of 70 4+ kids should be able to retire with full benefits at 70 make early retirement TREASON a childless spaces tax, including the abolition of senior only zoning, retirement village zoning, etc taxing homes without anyone under 30 in them Double, and homes without anyone under 40 in them Triple, allow all buildings to have second floors and beyond legally ban all restrictive zoning and housing regulations lower the working age to 5... mandate employment at least from 10 onwards... child labor is an alternative to mass immigration introduce fines for parents whos kids dont work from 10 0nwards loan forgiveness for startups, housing and education of 50k per child, DEATH PENALTY ban for firing pregnant women for being pregnant or refusing to pay maternal leave mandate jobs that can be done from home to be allowed to be done from home for parents of young kids implement price controls for any medicine with a patent (no patent no controls. this way they cant just force the government to subsidize their profits and if they dont want to be regulated we also wont respect their patents invest in "reforms" to allow easier employment of children in various industries, require elderly folks whom arent legally allowed to retire to work as greeters and cashiers if they cant do much else, require cashiers in non restaurants to be allowed to sit on the job unless otherwise demanded ban public spending on those with a condition not likely to improve implement the draft for anyone who has not had a job in the last 5 years (direct war with Russia) Honestly make the standard draft age 50 to keep young folks outside of war. obesity, smoking , drug addiction are all proven to lower fertility rates and increase healthcare costs therefore 25% additional income tax based on lifestyle with 25% for most and 50% for severe cases such as morbid obesity. Ban public spending on healthcare for anyone who refuses to pay these taxes and adjust accordingly so they are a boon for everyone else and never a burden. ban unemployment for anyone who cannot legally retire or anyone without a kid under 3. the main idea is to work to the bone those whom make bad decisions or dont have kids
1
@indianboy59 there are too many old lazy people on earth
1
i was thinking we just ban unemployment for anyone over 50 without at least 2 kids, punish those with 2 kids or more and arent 70 or 3 kids or more that arent 65 with the literal military draft. we need to make it as punishable as possible to not have kids
1
ibisarenotbinchickens9846 one i have a gf. probably hard labor in service for a corporation in a job where if they dont turn a profit on your labor you would be tried for treason. i wouldnt be against hanging childless folks that refuse to have gainful employment
1
@IvyANguyen honestly id rather have abolition its just inhumane to enslave younger generations for the old folks. For anyone without children over the age of 30 whom isnt actually working id argue for the draft, either the military or housing construction... no exceptions. The point for the post 40 unemployment tax is that it would have a minimum of 10k each year with failure to pay being punished with the draft. if people have 3 or more kids the wealth tax wouldnt kick in until a certain amount of money the entire ideological point is to motivate people to have kids more and reclaim the economy from pensioners.
1
@Mascaracontracabellera the problem isnt foreigners the problem is that literal retirees whoo havent really worked in 10-20 years on average make more than the average worker
1