Comments by "Philip Rayment" (@PJRayment) on "UN don’t ‘bother hiding their agenda’" video.

  1. @old's knife stuff Facts. Didn't you see the actual quotes they showed?
    6
  2. @old's knife stuff "And I am aware that Oz is violating human rights . Especially in Jails ." I'm not aware of that. "Just recently a lot of people had their human rights violated , Locked in their homes 23 hours a day like convicts !" Although I AM aware of that!
    4
  3.  @stefanantolin5501  "Yeah, from other UN member countries who complied and had nothing to hide perhaps?" No, the quotes were from the UN itself. Like the quotes about not worrying about the thickness of sandwiches despite them having written negatively about the thickness of sandwiches. "Some people need to be aware of basic Hypocrisy 101," Someone like the UN and sandwiches? "You shouldn't preach 'human rights' to the world IF you're not prepared to practice them 100% yourself." In principle, I agree. But there may be nuances. Like one government (e.g. Federal) practising them, but another (e.g. a state) not doing that. Or different people or groups having different ideas of what constitutes human rights. "You shouldn't Preach 'christianity' to others in the world IF you're only practicing Fake Christianity yourself." Granted, but keeping in mind that Christians aren't perfect, and will also get some things wrong. "You shouldn't preach Democracy to others IF it doesn't 'fully' apply in your own country. NB the USA!" How do you determine whether if "fully" applies? "And one for Sly Spews, you shouldn't preach "REAL NEWS, HONEST VIEWS" on your permanent banner if you mostly only employ "OPINION PIECES" to vomit your POOPAGRANDA!" True enough, if that's actually the case. Here's another one: You shouldn't point out others faults if you've got your own faults, such as maligning people without evidence. Which you're doing. "...the last decade of Lieberal mismanagement of the prisons and their operating mindset backed by those in the whole Legal and political system with vested interests." A claim that you have not provided evidence for. "IF you're Nothing to Hide, WHY the bleedin bureaucratic BS and the Sly guys mocking a serious world issue ..." Because you can make good (but imperfect) people look bad by being very selective in what you report, rather than giving a balanced view. Such as making Australia out to be less than perfect while ignoring much greater problems with other regimes. And such as claiming 'human rights' over trivial things like mentioned in this video. THAT is YOUR lesson in Basic Hypocrisy 101.
    1
  4. The $100M+ is a one-off to help defend a country being attacked. The $60M figure (or something like it) is an annual figure, and in order for a bureaucracy to be bureaucratic.
    1
  5.  @allandrennan4916  "...you really believe that.?" Why shouldn't I? Is there something incorrect in what I said? I notice that you didn't point out any error.
    1