Comments by "Philip Rayment" (@PJRayment) on "Many 'submit' to gender ideology, not 'accept' it: Matt Walsh" video.

@M60647 "The problem is in Matt's presentation - he blows things out of proportion." Or maybe you just have a poor sense of the right proportions? "On top of that, he'll find some random unhinged YouTuber or TikToker and present their ramblings as somehow being representative of everyone on the left." As opposed to how the left select participants who will tell the story they want?
3
@M60647 "Nowhere in my comment did I say anything about there not being a problem." That was the implication of accusing Walsh of fear mongering as opposed to pointing out a problem.
2
@Denchanter "I don’t announce my pronouns on my email." My work has given us the option, so not compulsory yet for me. "Nobody has ever called me a bigot." I've been called it many times. Because I'm prepared to oppose the lunacy. "This is a completely made up worry." No, it's not. My work requires us to use a person's choice of pronouns, on pain of being sacked. I have been threatened with the sack for expressing my views in a forum where I was invited to and told it was a 'safe space'! I have been told that I'm not allowed to express my views to my work colleagues, yet we are also told that we should all feel able to express who we are! These are not made up worries. They are quite real.
2
"his theocratic views on abortion, " So you think it's okay to kill innocent babies, I take it? But you're right. Unless you have God setting the standard, anything goes (to the extent that you can get away with it).
2
True. Better to force people to support leftist media like the ABC via their taxes and live off the taxpayer money. We can't have people willing to pay to bypass that propaganda and learn the truth.
1
@M60647 "Sadly, fear mongering by the likes of Matt Walsh and others generate more clicks and views." Warning people of what's happening is not 'fear mongering'. But this is a tactic of the left: a) change things in society; b) when conservatives push back, criticise them for supposedly being worried about nothing.
1
@tonyboleno8191 "sky "news" sure is obsessed with what other people do in the bedroom" Like you're obsessed with running down and misrepresenting Sky News?
1
@gooderspitman8052 "there is no god," Do you have good evidence for that claim? I keep asking people this, and they keep coming up empty. Will you be different? "total bollocks" Why is it total bollocks (apart from the JW bit)?
1
@gooderspitman8052 "yes, evolution," I commend you on at least making the attempt. However, evolution is an alternative view, not evidence of God's non-existence. "but of course that will not alter your delusions." You have yet to demonstrate that I'm deluded. "Your book says the world is two thousand years old, ..." No, it has chronological information in it allowing us to conclude that it's 6,000 years old. "but the hard science says, it’s 5.5 billion years old." No, science does not say that. Many (not all) scientists say that, but they are using a principle known as methodological naturalism, a principle that says that supernatural explanations must be excluded a priori. As such, using what scientists say as conclusion that God doesn't exist is a circular argument, because they start with essentially that position. So do you have any actual evidence? "But it will not change your view,..." Because it's not evidence, but a viewpoint based on naturalism. "...you evolved from a chimp,..." Nope. Evolution doesn't work. The actual science is against it. For one, it has no mechanism to create the new information for things to evolve. "Goodbye and may your god delusion go with you." You're giving up already? Okay, if that's all you can provide, then you have no evidence. And I do not have a delusion about God.
1