Comments by "Philip Rayment" (@PJRayment) on "Hamas’ ‘gleefulness’ revealed after ‘undercover’ interview with mastermind terrorist" video.
-
1
-
1
-
@petebusch9069
"Your basing this off of what you saw in the news."
In part. So? That doesn't make it wrong.
"Do you even know the entire history of this fight?"
I doubt that many know the entire history, as it's long and complicated. But I know plenty.
"I doubt it ..."
Why? Simply because I disagree with you?
"...you came to a conclusion just like that after you watched a couple new stories that pulled at your emotions."
Evidence please, that that's how I came to my conclusion. Or admit that you just made that up.
"Both sides are guilty, that is a fact."
Only if, by that, you mean that neither side is perfect and has never done anything wrong. But if you mean that both sides are (roughly) equally as guilty, that is utter nonsense.
"Stand with the innocent people that are not and will not be involved in horror like this, its the third choice."
What does that mean? That I should ignore that one side wants to kill all Jews, whilst the other is simply trying to defend itself? That's an abhorrent position to take. I can side with Israel AND with innocent people. The two positions are not mutually exclusive.
And by the way, you've made up things about me, but you haven't explain where the equivalence is, the very question I asked. I'm left with the conclusion that you can't.
1