Comments by "Philip Rayment" (@PJRayment) on "Left’s ‘hypocrisy’ called out following second attempt on Trump’s life" video.

@johnfox1580 "People kind of like their presidential candidates to not be convicted felons. Hard concept isn’t it." They also like their government to not have political prisoners. Like they're trying do to Trump. And if they see that, they stand up for the victim of it. That's one reason to support Trump.
1
@johnfox1580 "oh wow? Your kidding right? Political prisoner?" Even some Democrats have said that the charges were political. So no, I'm not kidding. "You’re in a cult…" Not at all. I'm going with the evidence, not leftist claims. You did know that the judge in one of his cases has a daughter who raises funds for Democrats? The judge should have recused himself to avoid perception of bias, but he refused.
1
@johnfox1580 "nahh, you are definitely in a cult." So, no rebuttal. Just baseless insults. I guess that's all you've got.
1
@johnfox1580 "I said what I had to say up above." Logically, you had to rebut. But you didn't. "And you are definitely in a cult isn't an insult, it's just a fact." You need to learn the difference between a fact and an opinion, especially a baseless one.
1
Yes, he's dangerous. To the left. And of course that's a good thing.
1
What lies? Evidence please. Accusations without evidence are not only worthless, but reflect badly on the accusers.
1
@walterbrowning "when is the last time you read a book ?" I'm part way through a two-volume pair. Your point...? "Read one about Rupert Murdock" In other words, you have no evidence. Telling me that evidence apparently exists in some book, is not evidence. And it's not my job to find evidence for your claim. That's your job. Further, why would a book about Murdoch document Bolt telling lies? Without the requested evidence, your claim is dismissed as baseless.
1
@walterbrowning "Bolt has form,..." And yet still no evidence! "...a cheerleader for a high profile child abuser." Evidence please, given that he was found not guilty by the Hight Court. "Censored for attempts to minimise the seriousness of child grooming ..." Huh? Evidence please. "...has had to pay compensation for reckless disregard to the facts ..." Evidence of that supposed reckless disregard please. "...the list is very long,..." The list of evidence-free accusations? No doubt. "...I don’t have time to put his misinformation in an Australian political context…" Don't worry about the context. As for having time, you've spent 83 words since I asked for evidence not providing one bit of it! "... like I said if you had read a book or two you would be much better informed." That's an ad hominem where there should be evidence. You're just continuing to show that you have none.
1