Hearted Youtube comments on Astrum (@astrumspace) channel.
-
10000
-
6200
-
4700
-
3900
-
3500
-
3300
-
2900
-
2600
-
2600
-
2400
-
2400
-
2200
-
1900
-
1800
-
1700
-
1600
-
1300
-
1300
-
1200
-
1200
-
1100
-
970
-
970
-
953
-
946
-
926
-
925
-
917
-
913
-
871
-
844
-
788
-
752
-
744
-
723
-
715
-
712
-
712
-
651
-
647
-
641
-
630
-
627
-
626
-
566
-
562
-
556
-
554
-
543
-
539
-
539
-
Fun Fact Myth: Callisto was a nymph who was seduced by Zeus, when he took the form of Artemis, whom she was in love with. They had a son, Arcus, who became a great hunter. Artemis kicked her to the curb, and Hera also found out and asked to speak to her manager. Irate, Hera transformed Callisto into a bear. Many years later, Arcus was hunting a bear, not kowing it was his mother. Seeing this all play out from Mount Olympus, Zeus blew Arcas and Callisto far away from each other and they each became constellations. Callisto became Ursa Major (the bear), and her son became Boötes (the herdsman).
512
-
502
-
496
-
496
-
496
-
496
-
490
-
461
-
459
-
458
-
446
-
439
-
436
-
429
-
428
-
415
-
409
-
401
-
400
-
400
-
399
-
396
-
391
-
391
-
389
-
365
-
351
-
343
-
341
-
327
-
324
-
323
-
313
-
312
-
312
-
311
-
302
-
299
-
298
-
288
-
287
-
287
-
284
-
280
-
279
-
263
-
It's flippin incredible to me that literally every single planet in our solar system, the only solar system that contains life as we know it so far, is unique in their own way. I mean, if one contemplates the random nature of planetary formation, one might assume that the vast majority of planets should be fairly similar and "boring", bland dusty desolate rocks.
But each and every single planet we have is utterly unique, even pluto and mercury with recent findings about their own oddities.
That tied in with the fact that our Moon is the only moon in the solar system that is the exact right size and distance from its planet to cause a perfect solar eclipse that reveals the corona, a perfect solar eclipse which ONLY occurs in the solar system as seen from Earth (if you stand on mars, phobos wont produce such an eclipse, nor will any other moon seen from the surface of their parent planet).
Contemplate that this perfect ratio ONLY occurs on the ONLY planet in the solar system with intelligent life on it.
Also contemplate that during the earlier time of Earth, such as during the dinosaur ages, the moon was closer to Earth and as such would have blocked out the corona as well.
This perfect ratio eclipse not only occurs around the ONLY planet with macroscopic life on it, it also ONLY occurs on this precise time when there are technologically advanced sentient beings here to witness it.
I'm not saying it's by design, i'm merely saying, our solar system is absolutely astronomically impossibly unlikely in its perfection and layout at this precise time when we are here to observe it. If we evolved 200 million years later, the Moon wouldnt create a perfect eclipse anymore. Food for thought. Perhaps such celestial phenomena act as a catalyst, a spark, for creative self-awareness. If that were to be the case, one can only imagine the effect of a solar system embedded within a vast nebula as opposed to the dark skies of Sol.
251
-
248
-
247
-
245
-
241
-
240
-
237
-
234
-
233
-
230
-
230
-
227
-
226
-
226
-
222
-
214
-
206
-
205
-
204
-
197
-
194
-
192
-
192
-
191
-
191
-
186
-
181
-
181
-
181
-
178
-
176
-
175
-
174
-
174
-
169
-
163
-
162
-
159
-
155
-
154
-
154
-
151
-
149
-
147
-
142
-
139
-
138
-
135
-
135
-
133
-
129
-
128
-
127
-
127
-
125
-
122
-
122
-
121
-
120
-
119
-
119
-
119
-
118
-
118
-
117
-
115
-
111
-
110
-
109
-
108
-
105
-
105
-
105
-
105
-
102
-
102
-
102
-
99
-
99
-
96
-
92
-
91
-
91
-
90
-
88
-
87
-
86
-
86
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
85
-
83
-
83
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
81
-
80
-
77
-
76
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
74
-
73
-
73
-
73
-
71
-
70
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
60
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
55
-
55
-
Ganymede, Europa, Titan, Venus sorta, Mars, Enceladus, Pluto, Triton, Iapetus, Ceres, Our moon are likely candidates
54
-
54
-
54
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
Sad to see you go, but beautiful a sight it was . Thank you Cassini. Rest. And Alex, It was, as always, giving the proper due justice and sublime in presentation... I've always endured my adulthood maintaining that overwhelming child's curiosity and reservoir of love and fascination with the Universe, as well as just our little point of space we still tip toe quietly, peeking in on our neighbors... Still so brand new to us all. It's great. My thanks to you, my friend, because the genuine sincerety and obvious love and excitement you have is apparent, it's good to find others as passionate about the seemingly unnoticed, overlooked play that is so delicately powerful in it's raw beauty, dancing the dance it always has and will always be, with no thought or knowledge of us. Yet we have but only to take in as long a look of it as we like, to witness the greatest thing we ever would hope to see. I guess some will win and some will have their smartphones and distractions. But the first video of yours, I was sold on immediately subscribing... Cuz you said, if I like space and wanted to go on a journey alongside you, well, I trusted the time would be just as well spent, and excited to see if my beautiful and wonderful 3 &1/2yr old son, shares my love for it all, as well.(!?!) Couldn't think of a better and trusting pilot to ferry us through, so, thank you for doing these. They mean a lot to some of us out there. And, have to give you your due props~ 3rd most soothing voice to hear, while journeys are taken... But don't feel too bad about third place, only Bob Ross, and Morgan Freeman best you there. Big Universe, so that's pretty good bro...look forward to your next one.
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
Ok. Did you want more proof? You who has zero proof.
1. On a globe, the circumference of the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn are equal, but, on a flat earth, the tropic of Capricorn would be 70% longer. What makes the sun slow down from December to June then speed up from June to December year after year?
2. What keeps the sun and moon in a circular motion above a stationary flat earth?
3. What causes the solar analemma? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQT5XRdrqvw
4. If you can see both the sun and moon during a selenelion eclipse, and they are at their maximum separation, why can't you see them all the time on a flat earth?
5. How can the earth's shadow fall on the moon at all (for a lunar eclipse) when the sun and moon are both 3000 miles above the flat earth?
6. How come the sun and moon disappear from view for hours at a time if they are 3000 miles above the flat earth? Or how do the sun and moon disappear behind the horizon on a flat earth?
7. If the Sun or moon leaves my perspective, why can I see the stars behind or above them?
8. What causes the phases of the moon?
9. What causes the tides?
10. What causes some planets to show a retrograde motion at times?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TK9ozJYELR8
11. How do the other observable planets disappear and reappear on a regular basis if the flat Earth is not moving?
12. Why are there two fixed stars (Polaris and Sigma Octantis) with a Coriolis Effect? Notice the clockwise motion in the southern hemisphere and the counter clockwise motion in the northern hemisphere, and why are the stars the same in the three southern continents?
England and Australia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNiNJC3UHIo
South Africa: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvhAhCBPJk0
South America: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-VWJHRN7cw&t=23s
13. Why can't everyone on the flat earth see the same stars all the time?
14. Why do the stars in the flat earth model firmament dome always move horizontally anti-clockwise over the whole earth?
15. What happens to a super nova in the firmament?
16. What about the curve? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpAGXpusAiQ
17. What causes the aurora borealis and aurora australis, and why can't everyone see them?
18. Can you explain the ice wall during the Cretaceous period when the polar ice caps did not exist?
19. What have Ryan Waters and all the other polar explorers like Spear17 proved to you?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Antarctic_expeditions
20. What section of the Antarctic treaty prevents exploration?
https://www.state.gov/t/avc/trty/193967.htm
21. What keeps us on the flat earth if not gravity because density and buoyancy do not account for acceleration?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyeF-_QPSbk
22. What causes a spherical drop of water?
23. What about Space? https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/3-as08-14-2383a.jpg
24. What about tectonic plates, earthquakes, and volcanoes (especially calderas) on a flat earth because no flat earther seems to know what is beneath the surface?
25. What about the 'firmament' and 'the four corners of the earth'?
https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/earth/does-bible-teach-earth-flat/
26. What keeps the flat earth from flipping over and killing us all?
14
-
14
-
One of my favorite books is Carl Sagan's "Contact". In the movie, as Jodie Foster is being taken from wormhole to wormhole, there is one scene where she comes upon a quad system, and tries to describe it. Instead, she breaks into tears and says "No words...poetry- they should have sent a poet". Looking at these Hubble images, and others I've seen, I couldn't agree more! What's really staggering to me are the distances. We are observing events that happened hundreds or thousands of years ago, even more! Finally, a bit off-topic, but I think most people wonder about the possibility of life elsewhere in the universe. I believe it to be more credible that there is, rather than that we are alone in all that vastness. Keep up the great work! P.S. money a little tight right now, but I will be making a donation soon. Well worth it!
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
I've just come from viewing many other YouTube posts about NASA fakery, never a moon landing, etc. I view these for the entertainment value, and for the chuckles I get from some of the comments. I came here for my daily dose of reality, and wasn't disappointed! Very refreshing, and great job on the presentation. As an avid hiker/climber, I would love to climb some of those mountains, maybe even O. Mons. The 38% gravity would sure help! As an avid, OLD hiker, I know it ain't gonna happen! I was 12 in 1969, and witnessed magic! Two men were walking on ground not of the Earth! I was old enough to understand a little bit about the technology, but young enough to feel the magic. Before my time comes, I would dearly love to feel that magic again. Let's get out there, and put some bootprints on Mars!
Regarding your presentation- this is proof positive that Mars was once very geologically active, especially in light of the different rock layers. I feel it is very possible that life may have arisen on Mars at one point, even if only at the microbial stage. Imagine what we could learn if we discovered evidence of that!
By the way- I was shocked to learn recently that the Earth is a spheroid. Who knew?!
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
Thanks Alex, your videos hit the sweet-spot with just enough depth of science, yet do not scare away the casual but interested layman. Your calm and relaxed vocal delivery beats the far too common 'Oh my God!' far too excited delivery of most American professional productions. I sincerely congratulate you, I find your videos enthralling, and always answer questions that have come to me over the years. You remind me of the great David Attenborough, whose delivery is above compare in his field. With your meticulous research, and understanding of your subject, I hope you might find yourself walking in David's footsteps on a professional level, but in the Astronomy field. So few people seem to notice that we have an amazing Star just a short distance away from our planet, to which all life owes its existence. Many thanks for your hard work on each and every production you make, and please continue to inform me...I can't think of another YT
channel as succinct as yours on this subject :)
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@Paul Hotson Sorry if I was being unclear: I was searching for references to scientific papers. YouTube is rarely a source of information -- usually it's just people offering a way to look at information (or often, misinformation).
But I watched a couple of videos from that channel you linked (I didn't know it before). Sadly, often I couldn't find sources in the video description. The one video I watched with a source in the description was the one about the IPCC Official. The original source is in German -- luckily I do speak German, so I read the interview. Unfortunately, the video doesn't truthfully reflect what was said in the interview. Ottmar Edenhofer did not at all say that "global warming is a lie". Instead, the interview is about the challenges we need to face in order to tackle climate change. Because yes, reducing CO2 emissions is not just about the climate, but obviously about economy, too. Restricting ourselves from doing certain things has a bigger impact on some than on others. A complete ban on CO2 emission, for example, would obviously hurt the ones with the most resources of gas, oil and coal. So: climate change is not a lie to redistribute wealth, but in tackling climate change, some wealth redistribution could happen and we should take care to not disrupt the global economy too much. That's basically the gist of the interview. Edenhofer ends the interview by saying that we (as humanity) have to find a way to get a CO2-free world-economy.
So please don't treat YouTube channels as source of information or at least check the information yourself before spreading it.
EDIT: Sorry, I didn't see your edit! About that video: I'm very happy that the source is linked in the description, very nice. I skimmed that paper. (Let's just assume here that the data from the paper is correct). Many conclusions in the video are sadly not backed by the actual data. What's true: there have been periods where the CO2 concentration was way higher than it is today. But in the last (roughly) 5 million years, CO2 concentration never reached 400ppm, and being around 300ppm for the past roughly 2,5 million years. It should be clear that their measurements don't include the current value (on a graph spanning 40 million years, the last 200 years are pretty small). So, according to their data, our current value of roughly 410ppm is higher than the last couple of million years. Was the concentration higher in the past? Yes. But earth looked way different back then.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
ok honestly i have absolutely no idea what you're even talking about or who these people even are, but you keep pushing these sources on me even though they all admit that human kind has an affect on the planet's warming or making these "historical" claims. at this point you are just saying all Ivy educated scientists and all politicians and the rest of NASA and the rest of the scientific community around the world, whom are highly educated, are all wrong. And you, an individual with significantly less education and experience in these fields, are right!
sure let's just go with that and say you win. you won against the scientific community and all their research with these youtube comments. in fact, you're going to be on the logs of history books when people look back at how foolish and greedy the scientific community was for... doing their job! >:(
you want to keep emphatically denying these claims, sure. if that makes you feel like you have any semblance of power or if it gives you any comfort on holding on to a relic of a past where things were "simpler" then so be it. i can't change cognitive bias and i can't change you, but you're inevitably are going to be buying either solar or electric cars in the future and all companies are just inherently just looking towards sustainability. in five to ten years time when heat waves become so severe that the government has to more frequently order mandatory stay ins in your home, don't come crying to me. you want to misconstrue arguments that scientists are being irrational sure, but at the very moment we are speaking florida is being submerged by the rising sea. humanity won't die and we do find engineering solutions, but it doesn't mean it won't come at a cost for our select of our future generations and survival as a whole species.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I really appreciate the topics you delve into, the well-considered pacing you employ in doing so, and the fact that you're not afraid to make longer videos that explore topics more deeply. That is indeed a rarity in the YT world. Which brings me to another point. I think having a Patreon presence for Astrum is a wonderful idea, as it will allow those of us who can, support your work to whatever extent each of us can. That said, for those who would like to see ad-free videos, one option might be to ditch the YT platform entirely and head to greener (i.e. less restrictive) pastures, such as Rumble or Oddysee. I realise there are still many good reasons for content providers to post on YT, but I think having a long-term alternative on the back burner might be prudent. At any rate, Astrum is one of a handful of my all-time favourite channels, and I truly love what you do and how you do it. Cheers!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The International Space Station has mass. And as all things that have mass, it has a gravitational pull, just like you, me and the Earth. But it's way too light to have things orbiting it because it's too close to Earth and its Hill Sphere is smaller than the Space Station itself.
However, if it was really far away from big massive bodies like the Earth, then for sure if could have satellites orbiting it! In theory, things of any size could orbit it, since what matters is mass, not size (a bowling ball is the same size as a football, but it's a lot heavier). So, as long as something is lighter than the Space Station (anything less than about 420 tonnes) it could orbit it. If it was heavier than the Space Station, then the Station would become the satellite.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
You're channel is the perfect substitute for those documentaries you mentioned. You make about a 20min video that is SUPER focused on a certain planet, moon or a spacecraft. Its super informative and you find some incredible images. I'm huge in space and i have never seen some of these pictures! You really find the gems.
I think I saw you mention somewhere that you plan on continuing the "Moons" series. That would be awesome! I've seen you do quite a few in the past but doing videos around certain probes( where they've gone and what they've seen) is great and I'd love to see more! I know that solar probe just recently launched, once they get some data, that'd be a great one!
Also just a note. I'm an astrophysics major and the size of the universe is a fascinating topic. It is almost certainly one of two things. Based on measurements and calculations, the univerae is eaither infinite or really REALLY big. A good way to put it is that, standing on the Earth, it looks flat. But obviously it is a giant ball, we just can't see it. There's a type of curvature in the universe that hints at its shape and size. From our best measurements its flat which means its infinite. But the other possibility is that it is very big and as such it only SEEMS flat. With better measurements we could continue to look but there will always be a margin of error. Just a 0.0000000000000000001 error on the curvature means that there is still that possibility that the curviture is actually there, just too small too small to detect. Thus, if the curvature is too small to measure, the universe could be RIDICULOUSLY big but not infinite. The closer to 0 curvature it gets, it actually approaches infinity (since "flat" in this case means infinite).
However, another issue with this curvature is that there are many things it could mean. A "saddle" shaped, plane universe would be infinite and curved. That's just one example of many shapes which could be curved and only some are "spheres" in the sense that it is finite. Btw, there are other shapes it could be where its finite but physical size would be different because of the shape, ie a donut/ toroid, or possibly higher dimensional shapes. So the curvature can give us a lower bond on the size but we can't say for sure what shape or size it is.
The actual numbers: if its a "sphere", the lower bound is 50x the radius of the observable universe. Now because this is a 4th dimensional "sphere", there's no edge or center so the radius just allows you to get the sense of the volume.
If its a donut, the size could be comparable to the size of our observable universe. This means that some of the galaxies we see are actually double images. We could possibly see the Milky Way even, but it'd be much younger and different looking. This is all pretty abstract stuff. Just thought you and some readers might find interesting!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
When I close my eyes he seems like the voice, but before the face reveal and while watching him speak it don't seem like he is the voice. Idk I've always pictured an Indian (not native American) who was raised speaking the Queen's English.
Anyways, dude should have enough patrons cause the other channels that come anywhere near his in production, writing, topic's, and narration have a ton of patrons. If dude does these himself he is a beast in several areas. He needs to contract or delegate some tasks to others who are great at one thing IE graphics, writing, proofreading and fact checking, etc. That way he he just picks a topic out of a bunch on a list then gets someone to write it, someone to do the visuals, someone to edit it, someone to fact check and such that way he cuts down on his work. He still will have to delegate, make sure folks doing their job and read the script, but that seems much less.
Hell guys I like this channel enough I'd dedicate some time to it every week doing one of the needed tasks. I just know I'm more good at everything than awesome at any one thing and really the writing, visuals, proofreading and fact checking, and editing should each be done by someone who only does that one thing and is bad ass at it.
Apologies for going thru a time with little extra income, but if I can do anything else to help let me know. Heck I could be one of a few that moderates the chat to keep the spam and hate away. Anyways, if you never make another episode you have enriched mine and many other lives so I hope you succeed in any and everything you do.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
My dream is to see one day auroras in the sky, any sky.
If this is the price to see one, I may have tears of joy. We can rebuild, no matter the amount of time. This cut in technology will simply makes us stronger.
We passed the point of going back to the middle ages or lower. We know how to make cars and we still will. We know how to produce the goods.
Even if many dies, even if many suffer, even if the darkness take over us, there is still a day after the night. This may be a slap on our face, reminding us our place.
Those who panic, console them. Those who miss the old time, show them the world.
The worst that can be: 100 years of step back in technology for 10 years.
Governments will suddenly loose their tools to spy on us.
Economy may suffer, but who cares when you submit yourself to make crops in your garden since your techno oriented career is doom for some time like me.
But no matter what, if it happens, let show the universe that this is nothing.
We may need little push to go foward.
If this generation is not living one, may we remind our children this may happen.
Let's hope for the best.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Paul Hotson ok there are several problems with those graphs that makes them statistically skewed.
First, not all of those 1,218 USHCN weather stations have reported data continually since 1895. In fact, it’s not even close. The US did not have that many weather stations in the 1890s, so that means that the averages are being built off of many more data points in the later parts of the graph than in the earlier part (this speaks to the lake of data accuracy).
Second, of course you will see a larger number of “anomalies” (both record highs and record lows) in the earlier parts of the graph. This is due to the lack of a baseline for those counts. If you don’t have any data, then virtually every sample you take is going to be a record sample. Once the dataset has been established and you have enough data points to make a comparison too, then you can start to draw conclusions (as in the later few decades of the graph). What’s actually important in those graphs is not the actual number of record values being recorded, but that that number remains relatively constant. This speaks to the slope of the average temperature graph. If temperature were not increasing, we would not expect the count of record values to remain relatively constant. The constancy of those values means that temperature continues to increase at a relatively constant rate. Furthermore, it’s not the number of extreme temperatures that’s really relevant to this debate. The more relevant number is what those temperatures actually are - each record high is hotter than the previous, likewise, each record low is colder than the previous. This speaks directly to a more extreme climate.
Third, the initial large peak that you see on nearly all of the graphs during the 1930s corresponds with the dust bowl, which was another human-caused climate anomaly in the United States. So of course there were extremes during that time.
I don’t like drawing conclusions from data that missing the pertinent background explaining how it was compiled or without seeing the raw input values, but even the graphs you just shared are characteristic of a warming, more extreme climate, not the latter. This is exactly why scientific research is subject to scrutiny from peers before being published. That is how we avoid publishing misleading information, like what’s found on this blog.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
❤ I love your voice and fantastic content. I'm a 70yo now (and in poor health) but your channel helps me continue to learn about space, a subject which has been a favourite of mine since I was a small child, before my family even had a television...!!
Books and radio drew me, TV, and later the internet, only made it easier.
Astrum is the :icing on the cake' as it so easily explains sometimes quite complicated matters etc.
Sadly, I have, unfortunately no bank accounts, so have no way to donate to you (or any other) channel's Patreon, or via the YouTube 'Thank-You' device, so am sorry I cannot join in to help financially...😢
I hope to still be able to watch and learn from your videos, as I have up to now.
Thank you for all of your endeavours and dedication.
And, thank you for wanting to clarify your decision to extend your financial intake, so that you and your splendid team can continue to educate, entertain and enhance our lives as avid viewers of Astrum.❤🏴🙂🇬🇧🖖
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I am subbed to a TON of channels and save for very few, I hit the bell to get all notifications. Astrum is one of the select few that when I see a new video I know I'll be watching it regardless of thumbnail or title, you're up there with the VSauce's and SmarterEveryday's of this platform.
If the algorithm suggests videos to me and they have clickbait titles, mention the words 'SHOCKING' or 'Elon Musk said...', or have an absurd/unreal thumbnail you can be sure I won't click and may even ask to not see that channel again. We need channels like Astrum that stay true to themselves and build a large following because they are quality, thoughtful productions. Pandering to the algorithm just makes it worse.
I truly value this channel and I understand the pressure to cave in and fall in line, but you've gotten this far without doing so. The pressure should be on us, to tell our friends and colleagues about Astrum, to share your content on other social media platforms and spread the word, and where we can, support you on Patreon. Were I to have kids, 100% they would be Astrum fans.
If we cannot assist you in the growth, it is us that have failed. No-one should expect a free lunch, but times are difficult, I hope we can all work together and support the growth and keep this channel the magical place we know and love.
Thank you Alex and team, I love escaping into your dreamy worlds of far away realities, and to be clear, I will still be here should you change it up a bit, but humbly I hope it mostly stays the same, it's what brought me here and what keeps me here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1