Hearted Youtube comments on Astrum (@astrumspace) channel.

  1. 10000
  2. 6200
  3. 4700
  4. 3900
  5. 3500
  6. 3300
  7. 2900
  8. 2600
  9. 2600
  10. 2400
  11. 2400
  12. 2200
  13. 1900
  14. 1800
  15. 1700
  16. 1600
  17. 1300
  18. 1300
  19. 1200
  20. 1200
  21. 1100
  22. 970
  23. 970
  24. 953
  25. 946
  26. 926
  27. 925
  28. 917
  29. 913
  30. 871
  31. 844
  32. 788
  33. 752
  34. 744
  35. 723
  36. 715
  37. 712
  38. 712
  39. 651
  40. 647
  41. 641
  42. 630
  43. 627
  44. 626
  45. 566
  46. 562
  47. 556
  48. 554
  49. 543
  50. 539
  51. 539
  52. 512
  53. 502
  54. 496
  55. 496
  56. 496
  57. 496
  58. 490
  59. 461
  60. 459
  61. 458
  62. 446
  63. 439
  64. 436
  65. 429
  66. 428
  67. 415
  68. 409
  69. 401
  70. 400
  71. 400
  72. 399
  73. 396
  74. 391
  75. 391
  76. 389
  77. 365
  78. 351
  79. 343
  80. 341
  81. 327
  82. 324
  83. 323
  84. 313
  85. 312
  86. 312
  87. 311
  88. 302
  89. 299
  90. 298
  91. 288
  92. 287
  93. 287
  94. 284
  95. 280
  96. 279
  97. 263
  98. It's flippin incredible to me that literally every single planet in our solar system, the only solar system that contains life as we know it so far, is unique in their own way. I mean, if one contemplates the random nature of planetary formation, one might assume that the vast majority of planets should be fairly similar and "boring", bland dusty desolate rocks. But each and every single planet we have is utterly unique, even pluto and mercury with recent findings about their own oddities. That tied in with the fact that our Moon is the only moon in the solar system that is the exact right size and distance from its planet to cause a perfect solar eclipse that reveals the corona, a perfect solar eclipse which ONLY occurs in the solar system as seen from Earth (if you stand on mars, phobos wont produce such an eclipse, nor will any other moon seen from the surface of their parent planet). Contemplate that this perfect ratio ONLY occurs on the ONLY planet in the solar system with intelligent life on it. Also contemplate that during the earlier time of Earth, such as during the dinosaur ages, the moon was closer to Earth and as such would have blocked out the corona as well. This perfect ratio eclipse not only occurs around the ONLY planet with macroscopic life on it, it also ONLY occurs on this precise time when there are technologically advanced sentient beings here to witness it. I'm not saying it's by design, i'm merely saying, our solar system is absolutely astronomically impossibly unlikely in its perfection and layout at this precise time when we are here to observe it. If we evolved 200 million years later, the Moon wouldnt create a perfect eclipse anymore. Food for thought. Perhaps such celestial phenomena act as a catalyst, a spark, for creative self-awareness. If that were to be the case, one can only imagine the effect of a solar system embedded within a vast nebula as opposed to the dark skies of Sol.
    251
  99. 248
  100. 247
  101. 245
  102. 241
  103. 240
  104. 237
  105. 234
  106. 233
  107. 230
  108. 230
  109. 227
  110. 226
  111. 226
  112. 222
  113. 214
  114. 206
  115. 205
  116. 204
  117. 197
  118. 194
  119. 192
  120. 192
  121. 191
  122. 191
  123. 186
  124. 181
  125. 181
  126. 181
  127. 178
  128. 176
  129. 175
  130. 174
  131. 174
  132. 169
  133. 163
  134. 162
  135. 159
  136. 155
  137. 154
  138. 154
  139. 151
  140. 149
  141. 147
  142. 142
  143. 139
  144. 138
  145. 135
  146. 135
  147. 133
  148. 129
  149. 128
  150. 127
  151. 127
  152. 125
  153. 122
  154. 122
  155. 121
  156. 120
  157. 119
  158. 119
  159. 119
  160. 118
  161. 118
  162. 117
  163. 115
  164. 111
  165. 110
  166. 109
  167. 108
  168. 105
  169. 105
  170. 105
  171. 105
  172. 102
  173. 102
  174. 102
  175. 99
  176. 99
  177. 96
  178. 92
  179. 91
  180. 91
  181. 90
  182. 88
  183. 87
  184. 86
  185. 86
  186. 86
  187. 85
  188. 85
  189. 85
  190. 85
  191. 83
  192. 83
  193. 82
  194. 82
  195. 82
  196. 81
  197. 80
  198. 77
  199. 76
  200. 74
  201. 74
  202. 74
  203. 74
  204. 74
  205. 73
  206. 73
  207. 73
  208. 71
  209. 70
  210. 68
  211. 68
  212. 67
  213. 67
  214. 66
  215. 66
  216. 66
  217. 65
  218. 65
  219. 64
  220. 64
  221. 60
  222. 59
  223. 58
  224. 58
  225. 57
  226. 55
  227. 55
  228. 54
  229. 54
  230. 54
  231. 52
  232. 52
  233. 51
  234. 51
  235. 51
  236. 51
  237. 50
  238. 50
  239. 50
  240. 50
  241. 49
  242. 49
  243. 49
  244. 49
  245. 49
  246. 49
  247. 48
  248. 48
  249. 48
  250. 48
  251. 47
  252. 46
  253. 45
  254. 45
  255. 45
  256. 45
  257. 45
  258. 45
  259. 45
  260. 44
  261. 43
  262. 43
  263. 42
  264. 41
  265. 41
  266. 41
  267. 40
  268. 40
  269. 40
  270. 39
  271. 39
  272. 38
  273. 38
  274. 38
  275. 38
  276. 37
  277. 37
  278. 37
  279. 36
  280. 36
  281. 36
  282. 36
  283. 36
  284. 36
  285. 36
  286. 36
  287. 35
  288. 35
  289. 34
  290. 34
  291. 34
  292. 33
  293. 33
  294. 33
  295. 33
  296. 33
  297. 32
  298. 32
  299. 31
  300. 31
  301. 31
  302. 31
  303. 31
  304. 31
  305. 30
  306. 30
  307. 30
  308. 30
  309. 30
  310. 29
  311. 29
  312. 29
  313. 29
  314. 28
  315. 28
  316. 28
  317. 28
  318. 28
  319. 28
  320. 28
  321. 27
  322. Sad to see you go, but beautiful a sight it was . Thank you Cassini. Rest. And Alex, It was, as always, giving the proper due justice and sublime in presentation... I've always endured my adulthood maintaining that overwhelming child's curiosity and reservoir of love and fascination with the Universe, as well as just our little point of space we still tip toe quietly, peeking in on our neighbors... Still so brand new to us all. It's great. My thanks to you, my friend, because the genuine sincerety and obvious love and excitement you have is apparent, it's good to find others as passionate about the seemingly unnoticed, overlooked play that is so delicately powerful in it's raw beauty, dancing the dance it always has and will always be, with no thought or knowledge of us. Yet we have but only to take in as long a look of it as we like, to witness the greatest thing we ever would hope to see. I guess some will win and some will have their smartphones and distractions. But the first video of yours, I was sold on immediately subscribing... Cuz you said, if I like space and wanted to go on a journey alongside you, well, I trusted the time would be just as well spent, and excited to see if my beautiful and wonderful 3 &1/2yr old son, shares my love for it all, as well.(!?!) Couldn't think of a better and trusting pilot to ferry us through, so, thank you for doing these. They mean a lot to some of us out there. And, have to give you your due props~ 3rd most soothing voice to hear, while journeys are taken... But don't feel too bad about third place, only Bob Ross, and Morgan Freeman best you there. Big Universe, so that's pretty good bro...look forward to your next one.
    27
  323. 27
  324. 27
  325. 27
  326. 27
  327. 27
  328. 26
  329. 26
  330. 26
  331. 26
  332. 26
  333. 26
  334. 26
  335. 25
  336. 25
  337. 25
  338. 24
  339. 24
  340. 24
  341. 24
  342. 24
  343. 23
  344. 23
  345. 23
  346. 23
  347. 23
  348. 23
  349. 23
  350. 23
  351. 23
  352. 23
  353. 22
  354. 22
  355. 22
  356. 22
  357. 21
  358. 21
  359. 21
  360. 20
  361. 20
  362. 20
  363. 20
  364. 20
  365. 20
  366. Here is something to read first before using welding lenses. It depends on what shade they are. Do not use oxygen/gas welding ones that are shade 4, 6, or anything under at least 10. Shade 12 is the best but hard to find unless you modify an auto darkening setup at the infrared sensor. You can stack two shades such as a 4 and an 8 or however you feel is best but that is your own choice. It is best to have the filter at the end where sunlight is entering and not at the eyepiece. Just think of being a kid with a magnifying glass and an ant...Even with the filter, you become the ant. I have modified some to work on my telescope in different ways but I really only try to avoid looking through it and use a camera to see...Just in case of course. Something interesting to know about welding glasses is that they are made to filter all light except a small portion of the visible spectrum which is around 5 to 600nm (not 100 percent sure on the number) but it is to protect your eyes from the harmful ultraviolet radiation and other wavelengths when arc welding. To be the safest and if you have the money, buy a solar telescope setup. Looking at sunspots, which even though there are none right now and activity is low, the solar minimum phase is ending and will be more active soon. You can also see other solar events such as prominences and plasma "flames" with the correct filters and that is really awesome. That is where things get expensive or you gotta really use your brain to make things work. If not, an observatory would be the next choice. Knowing how social media runs the world even though I became very antisocial thanks to the ex wife, finding one nearby or other people interested in what is out there shouldn't be too hard to do. Be safe and don't do something that will cause harm to your self or to your property.
    20
  367. 20
  368. 19
  369. 19
  370. 19
  371. 19
  372. 19
  373. 19
  374. 19
  375. 19
  376. 19
  377. 19
  378. 19
  379. 19
  380. 19
  381. 18
  382. 18
  383. 18
  384. 18
  385. 18
  386. 18
  387. 18
  388. 18
  389. 18
  390. 18
  391. 18
  392. 18
  393. 18
  394. 18
  395. 17
  396. 17
  397. 17
  398. 17
  399. 17
  400. 17
  401. 17
  402. 17
  403. 17
  404. 16
  405. 16
  406. 16
  407. 16
  408. 16
  409. 15
  410. 15
  411. 15
  412. 15
  413. 15
  414. 15
  415. 15
  416. 15
  417. 15
  418. 15
  419. 15
  420. 15
  421. 15
  422. Ok. Did you want more proof? You who has zero proof. 1. On a globe, the circumference of the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn are equal, but, on a flat earth, the tropic of Capricorn would be 70% longer. What makes the sun slow down from December to June then speed up from June to December year after year? 2. What keeps the sun and moon in a circular motion above a stationary flat earth? 3. What causes the solar analemma? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQT5XRdrqvw 4. If you can see both the sun and moon during a selenelion eclipse, and they are at their maximum separation, why can't you see them all the time on a flat earth? 5. How can the earth's shadow fall on the moon at all (for a lunar eclipse) when the sun and moon are both 3000 miles above the flat earth? 6. How come the sun and moon disappear from view for hours at a time if they are 3000 miles above the flat earth? Or how do the sun and moon disappear behind the horizon on a flat earth? 7. If the Sun or moon leaves my perspective, why can I see the stars behind or above them? 8. What causes the phases of the moon? 9. What causes the tides? 10. What causes some planets to show a retrograde motion at times? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TK9ozJYELR8 11. How do the other observable planets disappear and reappear on a regular basis if the flat Earth is not moving? 12. Why are there two fixed stars (Polaris and Sigma Octantis) with a Coriolis Effect? Notice the clockwise motion in the southern hemisphere and the counter clockwise motion in the northern hemisphere, and why are the stars the same in the three southern continents? England and Australia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNiNJC3UHIo South Africa: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvhAhCBPJk0 South America: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-VWJHRN7cw&t=23s 13. Why can't everyone on the flat earth see the same stars all the time? 14. Why do the stars in the flat earth model firmament dome always move horizontally anti-clockwise over the whole earth? 15. What happens to a super nova in the firmament? 16. What about the curve? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpAGXpusAiQ 17. What causes the aurora borealis and aurora australis, and why can't everyone see them? 18. Can you explain the ice wall during the Cretaceous period when the polar ice caps did not exist? 19. What have Ryan Waters and all the other polar explorers like Spear17 proved to you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Antarctic_expeditions 20. What section of the Antarctic treaty prevents exploration? https://www.state.gov/t/avc/trty/193967.htm 21. What keeps us on the flat earth if not gravity because density and buoyancy do not account for acceleration? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QyeF-_QPSbk 22. What causes a spherical drop of water? 23. What about Space? https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/3-as08-14-2383a.jpg 24. What about tectonic plates, earthquakes, and volcanoes (especially calderas) on a flat earth because no flat earther seems to know what is beneath the surface? 25. What about the 'firmament' and 'the four corners of the earth'? https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/earth/does-bible-teach-earth-flat/ 26. What keeps the flat earth from flipping over and killing us all?
    14
  423. 14
  424. 14
  425. 14
  426. 14
  427. 14
  428. 14
  429. 14
  430. 14
  431. 14
  432. 14
  433. 14
  434. 14
  435. 14
  436. 13
  437. 13
  438. 13
  439. 13
  440. 13
  441. 13
  442. 13
  443. 13
  444. 13
  445. 13
  446. 12
  447. 12
  448. 12
  449. 12
  450. 12
  451. 12
  452. 12
  453. 12
  454. 12
  455. 12
  456. 12
  457. 12
  458. 12
  459. 12
  460. 12
  461. 12
  462. 12
  463. 12
  464. 11
  465. 11
  466. 11
  467. 11
  468. 11
  469. 11
  470. 11
  471. 11
  472. 11
  473. 11
  474. 11
  475. 11
  476. 11
  477. 11
  478. 11
  479. 11
  480. 11
  481. 11
  482. 11
  483. 10
  484. 10
  485. 10
  486. 10
  487. 10
  488. 10
  489. 10
  490. 10
  491. 10
  492. 10
  493. 10
  494. 10
  495. 10
  496. 10
  497. 10
  498. 10
  499. 10
  500. 10
  501. 10
  502. 10
  503. 10
  504. 10
  505. 10
  506. 10
  507. 10
  508. 9
  509. 9
  510. 9
  511. 9
  512. 9
  513. 9
  514. 9
  515. 9
  516. 9
  517. 9
  518. 9
  519. 9
  520. 9
  521. 9
  522. 9
  523. 9
  524. 9
  525. 9
  526. 9
  527. 9
  528. 9
  529. 9
  530. 9
  531. 9
  532. 9
  533. 9
  534. 9
  535. 9
  536. 9
  537. 9
  538. 9
  539. 8
  540. 8
  541. 8
  542. 8
  543. 8
  544. 8
  545. 8
  546. 8
  547. 8
  548. 8
  549. 8
  550. 8
  551. 8
  552. 8
  553. 8
  554. 8
  555. 8
  556. 8
  557. 8
  558. 8
  559. 8
  560. 8
  561. 8
  562. 8
  563. 8
  564. 8
  565. 8
  566. 8
  567. 8
  568. 8
  569. 8
  570. 8
  571. 8
  572. 8
  573. 8
  574. 8
  575. 8
  576. 8
  577. 8
  578. 8
  579. 8
  580. 8
  581. 8
  582. 8
  583. 8
  584. 8
  585. 8
  586. 8
  587. 8
  588. 7
  589. 7
  590. 7
  591. 7
  592. 7
  593. 7
  594. 7
  595. 7
  596. 7
  597. 7
  598. 7
  599. 7
  600. 7
  601. 7
  602. 7
  603. 7
  604. 7
  605. 7
  606. 7
  607. 7
  608. 7
  609. 7
  610. 7
  611. 7
  612. 7
  613. 7
  614. 7
  615. 7
  616. 7
  617. 7
  618. 7
  619. 7
  620. 7
  621. 7
  622. 7
  623. 7
  624. 7
  625. 7
  626. 7
  627. 7
  628. 7
  629. 7
  630. 7
  631. 7
  632. 7
  633. 7
  634. 7
  635. 7
  636. 7
  637. 7
  638. 7
  639. 7
  640. @Paul Hotson Sorry if I was being unclear: I was searching for references to scientific papers. YouTube is rarely a source of information -- usually it's just people offering a way to look at information (or often, misinformation). But I watched a couple of videos from that channel you linked (I didn't know it before). Sadly, often I couldn't find sources in the video description. The one video I watched with a source in the description was the one about the IPCC Official. The original source is in German -- luckily I do speak German, so I read the interview. Unfortunately, the video doesn't truthfully reflect what was said in the interview. Ottmar Edenhofer did not at all say that "global warming is a lie". Instead, the interview is about the challenges we need to face in order to tackle climate change. Because yes, reducing CO2 emissions is not just about the climate, but obviously about economy, too. Restricting ourselves from doing certain things has a bigger impact on some than on others. A complete ban on CO2 emission, for example, would obviously hurt the ones with the most resources of gas, oil and coal. So: climate change is not a lie to redistribute wealth, but in tackling climate change, some wealth redistribution could happen and we should take care to not disrupt the global economy too much. That's basically the gist of the interview. Edenhofer ends the interview by saying that we (as humanity) have to find a way to get a CO2-free world-economy. So please don't treat YouTube channels as source of information or at least check the information yourself before spreading it. EDIT: Sorry, I didn't see your edit! About that video: I'm very happy that the source is linked in the description, very nice. I skimmed that paper. (Let's just assume here that the data from the paper is correct). Many conclusions in the video are sadly not backed by the actual data. What's true: there have been periods where the CO2 concentration was way higher than it is today. But in the last (roughly) 5 million years, CO2 concentration never reached 400ppm, and being around 300ppm for the past roughly 2,5 million years. It should be clear that their measurements don't include the current value (on a graph spanning 40 million years, the last 200 years are pretty small). So, according to their data, our current value of roughly 410ppm is higher than the last couple of million years. Was the concentration higher in the past? Yes. But earth looked way different back then.
    7
  641. 7
  642. 7
  643. 7
  644. 6
  645. 6
  646. 6
  647. 6
  648. 6
  649. 6
  650. 6
  651. 6
  652. 6
  653. 6
  654. 6
  655. 6
  656. 6
  657. 6
  658. 6
  659. 6
  660. 6
  661. 6
  662. 6
  663. 6
  664. 6
  665. 6
  666. 6
  667. 6
  668. 6
  669. 6
  670. 6
  671. 6
  672. 6
  673. 6
  674. 6
  675. 6
  676. 6
  677. 6
  678. 6
  679. 6
  680. 6
  681. 6
  682. 6
  683. 6
  684. 6
  685. 6
  686. 6
  687. 6
  688. 6
  689. 6
  690. 6
  691. 6
  692. 6
  693. 6
  694. 6
  695. 6
  696. I wanna give you an experiment example that you can try yourself in order to understand why galaxies are moving away from each other even tho every matter in the universe attract each other gravitationally. Get a rubber band and a pencil. First I want you to imagine a rubber band as space. Then draw 2 dots on the rubber band with a pencil and imagine them as galaxies. Then hold rubber band on 2 sides pull it to stretch. And imagine it as the expansion of the universe. What you see is galaxies are separating away from each other as the universe expands. And get a 2nd rubber band and draw 2 dots again but draw them a bit further away this time. Hold both rubber bands and pull them together. Now you will see that the further the dots are the faster the separation. And now imagine that dots are 2 ants and they are trying to move towards each other. if they are closer, they separate slower with pulling so even tho they move slowly they eventually will catch each other. But if you put them further they need to walk faster in order to catch or they cannot overcome rubber bands separation. And even tho they move towards each other on the rubber band, you will still see them moving away from each other if they are distant enough or if you pull bands faster enough. Think about that 2 ants who can meet together and overcome the expansion of the rubber band are a local group. Let's call them ant Milkyway and ant Andromeda. And think about distant dots are distant galaxies. Even tho they are pulling gravitationally and try to meet, they cannot catch each other because of the expansion of the universe. That's the simplest way I can think of to explain it. Hope it helps.
    6
  697. 6
  698. 6
  699. 6
  700. 6
  701. 6
  702. 6
  703. 6
  704. 6
  705. 6
  706. 6
  707. 6
  708. 6
  709. 6
  710. 6
  711. 6
  712. 6
  713. 5
  714. 5
  715. 5
  716. 5
  717. 5
  718. 5
  719. 5
  720. 5
  721. 5
  722. 5
  723. 5
  724. 5
  725. 5
  726. 5
  727. 5
  728. 5
  729. 5
  730. 5
  731. 5
  732. 5
  733. 5
  734. 5
  735. 5
  736. 5
  737. 5
  738. 5
  739. 5
  740. 5
  741. 5
  742. 5
  743. 5
  744. 5
  745. 5
  746. 5
  747. 5
  748. 5
  749. 5
  750. 5
  751. 5
  752. 5
  753. 5
  754. 5
  755. 5
  756. 5
  757. 5
  758. 5
  759. 5
  760. 5
  761. 5
  762. 5
  763. 5
  764. 5
  765. 5
  766. 5
  767. 5
  768. 5
  769. 5
  770. 5
  771. 5
  772. 5
  773. 5
  774. 5
  775. 5
  776. 5
  777. 5
  778. 5
  779. 5
  780. 5
  781. 5
  782. 5
  783. 5
  784. 5
  785. 5
  786. 5
  787. 5
  788. 5
  789. 5
  790. 5
  791. 5
  792. 5
  793. 5
  794. 5
  795. 5
  796. 5
  797. 5
  798. 5
  799. ok honestly i have absolutely no idea what you're even talking about or who these people even are, but you keep pushing these sources on me even though they all admit that human kind has an affect on the planet's warming or making these "historical" claims. at this point you are just saying all Ivy educated scientists and all politicians and the rest of NASA and the rest of the scientific community around the world, whom are highly educated, are all wrong. And you, an individual with significantly less education and experience in these fields, are right! sure let's just go with that and say you win. you won against the scientific community and all their research with these youtube comments. in fact, you're going to be on the logs of history books when people look back at how foolish and greedy the scientific community was for... doing their job! >:( you want to keep emphatically denying these claims, sure. if that makes you feel like you have any semblance of power or if it gives you any comfort on holding on to a relic of a past where things were "simpler" then so be it. i can't change cognitive bias and i can't change you, but you're inevitably are going to be buying either solar or electric cars in the future and all companies are just inherently just looking towards sustainability. in five to ten years time when heat waves become so severe that the government has to more frequently order mandatory stay ins in your home, don't come crying to me. you want to misconstrue arguments that scientists are being irrational sure, but at the very moment we are speaking florida is being submerged by the rising sea. humanity won't die and we do find engineering solutions, but it doesn't mean it won't come at a cost for our select of our future generations and survival as a whole species.
    5
  800. 5
  801. 5
  802. 5
  803. 5
  804. 5
  805. 5
  806. 5
  807. 5
  808. 5
  809. 5
  810. 5
  811. 5
  812. 5
  813. 5
  814. 5
  815. 5
  816. 5
  817. 5
  818. 5
  819. 5
  820. 5
  821. 5
  822. 5
  823. 5
  824. 5
  825. 5
  826. 5
  827. 4
  828. 4
  829. 4
  830. 4
  831. 4
  832. 4
  833. 4
  834. 4
  835. 4
  836. 4
  837. 4
  838. 4
  839. 4
  840. 4
  841. 4
  842. 4
  843. 4
  844. 4
  845. 4
  846. 4
  847. 4
  848. 4
  849. 4
  850. 4
  851. 4
  852. 4
  853. Okay my fourth video so far and I only found you an hour and a half ago. You my friend are the first person that I will seriously consider donating to. I make videos from time to time and I know what goes into it. I don't know how you get all the graphics but you my friend should be working for a major Network somewhere. For now I'll just thank my lucky stars for running into your videos. Since I've never donated before, now I'll have to figure out how. LOL keep it up and again I don't know how you do it. The only other guy that I would seriously consider donating to is the engineer who puts together smarter every day. His videos like yours are incredibly entertaining. The money spent on cameras that can record in 4k with 8000 frames per second with infrared at night and a snow storm. LOL you guys are incredible but yours I watch and I don't know how many you have up but when I've had exhausted all of them I will be sending you messages to make more. But I need to ask you a very very important question. It is regard to a different video that you had made about Pluto. OMG all that money spent on the incredible Voyages of all these spacecrafts and people on this planet or more concerned with taking selfies. LOL my question is simply this with all the hoopla of how Pluto wasn't a planet anymore and downgraded to a rock in space just a couple of years ago because there was no Corona which decommissioned our solar system to eight planets. At that time I thought it's silly that people we're so upset about a rock. But after watching your video how in the hell have they not reversed that decision? If you could answer that, well that I would be very interested to read. As usual thank you thank you for another stellar video. You hit it out of the park with a planet you didn't even think would have that much interesting data to convey.
    4
  854. 4
  855. 4
  856. 4
  857. 4
  858. 4
  859. 4
  860. 4
  861. 4
  862. 4
  863. 4
  864. 4
  865. 4
  866. 4
  867. 4
  868. 4
  869. 4
  870. 4
  871. 4
  872. 4
  873. 4
  874. 4
  875. 4
  876. 4
  877. 4
  878. 4
  879. 4
  880. 4
  881. 4
  882. 4
  883. 4
  884. 4
  885. 4
  886. 4
  887. 4
  888. 4
  889. 4
  890. 4
  891. 4
  892. 4
  893. 4
  894. 4
  895. 4
  896. 4
  897. 4
  898. 4
  899. 4
  900. 4
  901. 4
  902. 4
  903. 4
  904. 4
  905. 4
  906. 4
  907. 4
  908. 4
  909. 4
  910. 4
  911. 4
  912. 4
  913. 4
  914. 4
  915. 4
  916. 4
  917. 4
  918. 4
  919. 4
  920. 4
  921. 4
  922. 4
  923. 4
  924. 4
  925. 4
  926. 4
  927. 4
  928. 4
  929. 4
  930. 4
  931. 4
  932. 4
  933. 4
  934. 4
  935. 4
  936. 4
  937. 4
  938. 4
  939. 4
  940. 4
  941. 4
  942. 4
  943. 4
  944. 4
  945. 4
  946. 4
  947. 4
  948. 4
  949. 4
  950. 4
  951. 4
  952. 4
  953. 4
  954. 4
  955. 4
  956. 4
  957. 4
  958. 4
  959. 4
  960. 4
  961. 4
  962. 4
  963. 4
  964. 3
  965. 3
  966. 3
  967. 3
  968. 3
  969. 3
  970. 3
  971. 3
  972. 3
  973. 3
  974. 3
  975. 3
  976. 3
  977. 3
  978. 3
  979. 3
  980. 3
  981. 3
  982. 3
  983. 3
  984. 3
  985. 3
  986. 3
  987. 3
  988. 3
  989. 3
  990. 3
  991. 3
  992. 3
  993. 3
  994. 3
  995. 3
  996. 3
  997. 3
  998. 3
  999. 3
  1000. 3
  1001. 3
  1002. 3
  1003. 3
  1004. 3
  1005. 3
  1006. 3
  1007. 3
  1008. 3
  1009. 3
  1010. 3
  1011. 3
  1012. 3
  1013. 3
  1014. 3
  1015. 3
  1016. 3
  1017. 3
  1018. 3
  1019. 3
  1020. 3
  1021. 3
  1022. 3
  1023. 3
  1024. 3
  1025. 3
  1026. 3
  1027. 3
  1028. 3
  1029. 3
  1030. 3
  1031. 3
  1032. 3
  1033. 3
  1034. 3
  1035. 3
  1036. 3
  1037. 3
  1038. 3
  1039. 3
  1040. 3
  1041. 3
  1042. 3
  1043. 3
  1044. 3
  1045. 3
  1046. 3
  1047. 3
  1048. 3
  1049. 3
  1050. 3
  1051. 3
  1052. 3
  1053. 3
  1054. 3
  1055. 3
  1056. 3
  1057. 3
  1058. 3
  1059. 3
  1060. 3
  1061. 3
  1062. 3
  1063. 3
  1064. 3
  1065. 3
  1066. 3
  1067. 3
  1068. 3
  1069. 3
  1070. 3
  1071. 3
  1072. 3
  1073. 3
  1074. 3
  1075. 3
  1076. 3
  1077. 3
  1078. 3
  1079. 3
  1080. 3
  1081. 3
  1082. 3
  1083. 3
  1084. 3
  1085. 3
  1086. 3
  1087. 3
  1088. 3
  1089. 3
  1090. 3
  1091. 3
  1092. 3
  1093. 3
  1094. 3
  1095. 3
  1096. 3
  1097. 3
  1098. 3
  1099. 3
  1100. 3
  1101. 3
  1102. 3
  1103. 3
  1104. 3
  1105. 3
  1106. 3
  1107. 3
  1108. 3
  1109. 3
  1110. 3
  1111. 3
  1112. 3
  1113. 3
  1114. 3
  1115. 3
  1116. 3
  1117. 3
  1118. 3
  1119. 3
  1120. 3
  1121. 3
  1122. 3
  1123. 3
  1124. 3
  1125. 3
  1126. 3
  1127. 3
  1128. 3
  1129. 3
  1130. 3
  1131. 3
  1132. 3
  1133. 3
  1134. 3
  1135. 3
  1136. 3
  1137. 3
  1138. 3
  1139. 3
  1140. 3
  1141. 3
  1142. 3
  1143. 3
  1144. 3
  1145. 3
  1146. 3
  1147. 3
  1148. 3
  1149. 3
  1150. 3
  1151. 3
  1152. 3
  1153. 3
  1154. 3
  1155. 3
  1156. 3
  1157. 3
  1158. 3
  1159. 3
  1160. 3
  1161. 3
  1162. 3
  1163. 3
  1164. 3
  1165. 3
  1166. 3
  1167. 3
  1168. 3
  1169. 3
  1170. 3
  1171. 3
  1172. 3
  1173. 3
  1174. 3
  1175. 3
  1176. 3
  1177. 3
  1178. 3
  1179. 3
  1180. 3
  1181. 3
  1182. 3
  1183. 3
  1184. 3
  1185. 3
  1186. 3
  1187. 3
  1188. 3
  1189. 3
  1190. 3
  1191. 3
  1192. 3
  1193. 3
  1194. 3
  1195. 3
  1196. 3
  1197. 3
  1198. 3
  1199. 3
  1200. 3
  1201. 3
  1202. 3
  1203. 3
  1204. 3
  1205. 3
  1206. 3
  1207. 3
  1208. 3
  1209. 3
  1210. 3
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. You're channel is the perfect substitute for those documentaries you mentioned. You make about a 20min video that is SUPER focused on a certain planet, moon or a spacecraft. Its super informative and you find some incredible images. I'm huge in space and i have never seen some of these pictures! You really find the gems. I think I saw you mention somewhere that you plan on continuing the "Moons" series. That would be awesome! I've seen you do quite a few in the past but doing videos around certain probes( where they've gone and what they've seen) is great and I'd love to see more! I know that solar probe just recently launched, once they get some data, that'd be a great one! Also just a note. I'm an astrophysics major and the size of the universe is a fascinating topic. It is almost certainly one of two things. Based on measurements and calculations, the univerae is eaither infinite or really REALLY big. A good way to put it is that, standing on the Earth, it looks flat. But obviously it is a giant ball, we just can't see it. There's a type of curvature in the universe that hints at its shape and size. From our best measurements its flat which means its infinite. But the other possibility is that it is very big and as such it only SEEMS flat. With better measurements we could continue to look but there will always be a margin of error. Just a 0.0000000000000000001 error on the curvature means that there is still that possibility that the curviture is actually there, just too small too small to detect. Thus, if the curvature is too small to measure, the universe could be RIDICULOUSLY big but not infinite. The closer to 0 curvature it gets, it actually approaches infinity (since "flat" in this case means infinite). However, another issue with this curvature is that there are many things it could mean. A "saddle" shaped, plane universe would be infinite and curved. That's just one example of many shapes which could be curved and only some are "spheres" in the sense that it is finite. Btw, there are other shapes it could be where its finite but physical size would be different because of the shape, ie a donut/ toroid, or possibly higher dimensional shapes. So the curvature can give us a lower bond on the size but we can't say for sure what shape or size it is. The actual numbers: if its a "sphere", the lower bound is 50x the radius of the observable universe. Now because this is a 4th dimensional "sphere", there's no edge or center so the radius just allows you to get the sense of the volume. If its a donut, the size could be comparable to the size of our observable universe. This means that some of the galaxies we see are actually double images. We could possibly see the Milky Way even, but it'd be much younger and different looking. This is all pretty abstract stuff. Just thought you and some readers might find interesting!
    2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404. 2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. 2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. 2
  1416. 2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419. 2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. 2
  1423. 2
  1424. 2
  1425. 2
  1426. 2
  1427. 2
  1428. 2
  1429. 2
  1430. 2
  1431. 2
  1432. 2
  1433. 2
  1434. 2
  1435. 2
  1436. 2
  1437. 2
  1438. 2
  1439. 2
  1440. 2
  1441. 2
  1442. 2
  1443. When I close my eyes he seems like the voice, but before the face reveal and while watching him speak it don't seem like he is the voice. Idk I've always pictured an Indian (not native American) who was raised speaking the Queen's English. Anyways, dude should have enough patrons cause the other channels that come anywhere near his in production, writing, topic's, and narration have a ton of patrons. If dude does these himself he is a beast in several areas. He needs to contract or delegate some tasks to others who are great at one thing IE graphics, writing, proofreading and fact checking, etc. That way he he just picks a topic out of a bunch on a list then gets someone to write it, someone to do the visuals, someone to edit it, someone to fact check and such that way he cuts down on his work. He still will have to delegate, make sure folks doing their job and read the script, but that seems much less. Hell guys I like this channel enough I'd dedicate some time to it every week doing one of the needed tasks. I just know I'm more good at everything than awesome at any one thing and really the writing, visuals, proofreading and fact checking, and editing should each be done by someone who only does that one thing and is bad ass at it. Apologies for going thru a time with little extra income, but if I can do anything else to help let me know. Heck I could be one of a few that moderates the chat to keep the spam and hate away. Anyways, if you never make another episode you have enriched mine and many other lives so I hope you succeed in any and everything you do.
    2
  1444. 2
  1445. 2
  1446. 2
  1447. 2
  1448. 2
  1449. 2
  1450. 2
  1451. 2
  1452. 2
  1453. 2
  1454. 2
  1455. 2
  1456. 2
  1457. 2
  1458. 2
  1459. 2
  1460. 2
  1461. 2
  1462. 2
  1463. 2
  1464. 2
  1465. 2
  1466. 2
  1467. 2
  1468. 2
  1469. 2
  1470. 2
  1471. 2
  1472. 2
  1473. 2
  1474. 2
  1475. 2
  1476. 2
  1477. 2
  1478. 2
  1479. 2
  1480. 2
  1481. 2
  1482. 2
  1483. 2
  1484. 2
  1485. 2
  1486. 2
  1487. 2
  1488. 2
  1489. 2
  1490. 2
  1491. 2
  1492. 2
  1493. 2
  1494. 2
  1495. 2
  1496. 2
  1497. 2
  1498. 2
  1499. 2
  1500. 2
  1501. 2
  1502. 2
  1503. 2
  1504. 2
  1505. 2
  1506. 2
  1507. 2
  1508. 2
  1509. 2
  1510. 2
  1511. 2
  1512. 2
  1513. 2
  1514. 2
  1515. 2
  1516. 2
  1517. 2
  1518. 2
  1519. 2
  1520. 2
  1521. 2
  1522. 2
  1523. 2
  1524. 2
  1525. 2
  1526. I wish they'd send some rovers to the volcanic regions to look for thermal sources that future colonist will need or perhaps track down the source of seasonal methane production . Recently a lake 12 miles long was found under 1 mile of ice on Mars . So how is it that this is possible ? Either there's geothermal heating or something else that's causing the ice to melt . If there's one ,theres more and we'll need to find those sources of liquid water and geothermal sources for energy production to survive . Using solar panels won't cut it on Mars since the entire planet gets enveloped in gigantic sand storms . We'll have to use nuclear power or geothermal sources for energy . We'll also have to live underground or have clear paneling that can filter out cosmic and solar radiation . Also if we're going to survive on that planet we'll have to use LED lighting for growing our food and will have to shield ourselves from the harshness of this planet . Even the sand is radioactive which means we'll need advanced filtration systems to keep the radioactive sands to a minimum . Although Mars may look inviting and somewhat like a place we're familiar with ,the reality is much different . The future colonist will become their own species over time and won't be able to make a visit to Earth after awhile since the gravity would be too much for their bodies to handle unless they had some sort of technology to counter the effects of our gravity . Furthermore their society will develop independent from our own civilization and become very much independent after awhile . In essence they will become aliens to us and vice versa . This is all assuming that this effort will succeed and that they manage to survive at all . We tend to romanticize this notion of colonizing Mars and most don't realize how severe and hazardous Mars truly is let alone the complexities to space travel or how deadly space is . We have many obstacles in our way but I think it's doable .
    2
  1527. 2
  1528. 2
  1529. 2
  1530. 2
  1531. 2
  1532. 2
  1533. 2
  1534. 2
  1535. 2
  1536. 2
  1537. 2
  1538. 2
  1539. 2
  1540. 2
  1541. 2
  1542. 2
  1543. 2
  1544. 2
  1545. 2
  1546. 2
  1547. 2
  1548. 2
  1549. 2
  1550. 2
  1551. 2
  1552. 2
  1553. 2
  1554. 2
  1555. 2
  1556. 2
  1557. 2
  1558. 2
  1559. 2
  1560. 2
  1561. 2
  1562. 2
  1563. 2
  1564. 2
  1565. 2
  1566. 2
  1567. 2
  1568. 2
  1569. 2
  1570. 2
  1571. 2
  1572. 2
  1573. 2
  1574. 2
  1575. 2
  1576. 2
  1577. 2
  1578. 2
  1579. 2
  1580. 2
  1581. 2
  1582. 2
  1583. 2
  1584. 2
  1585. 2
  1586. 2
  1587. 2
  1588. 2
  1589. 2
  1590. 2
  1591. 2
  1592. 2
  1593. 2
  1594. 2
  1595. 2
  1596. 2
  1597. 2
  1598. 2
  1599. 2
  1600. 2
  1601. 2
  1602. 2
  1603. 2
  1604. 2
  1605. 2
  1606. 2
  1607. 2
  1608. 2
  1609. 2
  1610. 2
  1611. 2
  1612. 2
  1613. 2
  1614. 2
  1615. 2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. 2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629. 2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. 2
  1648. 2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. 2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664. 2
  1665. 2
  1666. 2
  1667. 2
  1668. 2
  1669. 2
  1670. 2
  1671. 2
  1672. 2
  1673. 2
  1674. 2
  1675. 2
  1676. 2
  1677. 2
  1678. 2
  1679. 2
  1680. 2
  1681. 2
  1682. 2
  1683. 2
  1684. 2
  1685. 2
  1686. 2
  1687. 2
  1688. 2
  1689. 2
  1690. 2
  1691. 2
  1692. 2
  1693. 2
  1694. 2
  1695. 2
  1696. 2
  1697. 2
  1698. 2
  1699. 2
  1700. 2
  1701. 2
  1702. 2
  1703. 2
  1704. 2
  1705. 2
  1706. 2
  1707. 2
  1708. 2
  1709. 2
  1710. 2
  1711. 2
  1712. 2
  1713. 2
  1714. 2
  1715. 2
  1716. 2
  1717. 2
  1718. 2
  1719. 2
  1720. 2
  1721. 2
  1722. 2
  1723. 2
  1724. 2
  1725. 2
  1726. 2
  1727. 2
  1728. 2
  1729. 2
  1730. 2
  1731. 2
  1732. 2
  1733. 2
  1734. 2
  1735. 2
  1736. 2
  1737. 2
  1738. 2
  1739. 2
  1740. 2
  1741. 2
  1742. 2
  1743. 2
  1744. 2
  1745. 2
  1746. 2
  1747. 2
  1748. 2
  1749. 2
  1750. 2
  1751. 2
  1752. 2
  1753. 2
  1754. 2
  1755. 2
  1756. 2
  1757. 2
  1758. 2
  1759. 2
  1760. 2
  1761. 2
  1762. 2
  1763. 2
  1764. 2
  1765. 2
  1766. 2
  1767. 2
  1768. 2
  1769. 2
  1770. 2
  1771. 2
  1772. 2
  1773. 2
  1774. 2
  1775. 2
  1776. 2
  1777. 2
  1778. 2
  1779. 2
  1780. 2
  1781. 2
  1782. 2
  1783. 2
  1784. 2
  1785. 2
  1786. 2
  1787. 2
  1788. 2
  1789. 2
  1790. 2
  1791. 2
  1792. 2
  1793. 2
  1794. 2
  1795. 2
  1796. 2
  1797. 2
  1798. 2
  1799. 2
  1800. 2
  1801. 2
  1802. 2
  1803. 2
  1804. 2
  1805. 2
  1806. 2
  1807. 2
  1808. 2
  1809. 2
  1810. 2
  1811. 2
  1812. 2
  1813. 2
  1814. 2
  1815. 2
  1816. 2
  1817. 2
  1818. 2
  1819. 2
  1820. 2
  1821. 2
  1822. 2
  1823. 2
  1824. 2
  1825. 2
  1826. 2
  1827. 2
  1828. 2
  1829. Paul Hotson ok there are several problems with those graphs that makes them statistically skewed. First, not all of those 1,218 USHCN weather stations have reported data continually since 1895. In fact, it’s not even close. The US did not have that many weather stations in the 1890s, so that means that the averages are being built off of many more data points in the later parts of the graph than in the earlier part (this speaks to the lake of data accuracy). Second, of course you will see a larger number of “anomalies” (both record highs and record lows) in the earlier parts of the graph. This is due to the lack of a baseline for those counts. If you don’t have any data, then virtually every sample you take is going to be a record sample. Once the dataset has been established and you have enough data points to make a comparison too, then you can start to draw conclusions (as in the later few decades of the graph). What’s actually important in those graphs is not the actual number of record values being recorded, but that that number remains relatively constant. This speaks to the slope of the average temperature graph. If temperature were not increasing, we would not expect the count of record values to remain relatively constant. The constancy of those values means that temperature continues to increase at a relatively constant rate. Furthermore, it’s not the number of extreme temperatures that’s really relevant to this debate. The more relevant number is what those temperatures actually are - each record high is hotter than the previous, likewise, each record low is colder than the previous. This speaks directly to a more extreme climate. Third, the initial large peak that you see on nearly all of the graphs during the 1930s corresponds with the dust bowl, which was another human-caused climate anomaly in the United States. So of course there were extremes during that time. I don’t like drawing conclusions from data that missing the pertinent background explaining how it was compiled or without seeing the raw input values, but even the graphs you just shared are characteristic of a warming, more extreme climate, not the latter. This is exactly why scientific research is subject to scrutiny from peers before being published. That is how we avoid publishing misleading information, like what’s found on this blog.
    2
  1830. 2
  1831. 2
  1832. 2
  1833. 2
  1834. 2
  1835. 2
  1836. 2
  1837. 2
  1838. 2
  1839. 2
  1840. 2
  1841. 2
  1842. 2
  1843. 2
  1844. 2
  1845. 2
  1846. 2
  1847. 2
  1848. 2
  1849. 2
  1850. 2
  1851. 2
  1852. 2
  1853. 2
  1854. 2
  1855. 2
  1856. 2
  1857. 2
  1858. 2
  1859. 2
  1860. 2
  1861. 2
  1862. 2
  1863. 2
  1864. 2
  1865. 2
  1866. 2
  1867. 2
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. I am subbed to a TON of channels and save for very few, I hit the bell to get all notifications. Astrum is one of the select few that when I see a new video I know I'll be watching it regardless of thumbnail or title, you're up there with the VSauce's and SmarterEveryday's of this platform. If the algorithm suggests videos to me and they have clickbait titles, mention the words 'SHOCKING' or 'Elon Musk said...', or have an absurd/unreal thumbnail you can be sure I won't click and may even ask to not see that channel again. We need channels like Astrum that stay true to themselves and build a large following because they are quality, thoughtful productions. Pandering to the algorithm just makes it worse. I truly value this channel and I understand the pressure to cave in and fall in line, but you've gotten this far without doing so. The pressure should be on us, to tell our friends and colleagues about Astrum, to share your content on other social media platforms and spread the word, and where we can, support you on Patreon. Were I to have kids, 100% they would be Astrum fans. If we cannot assist you in the growth, it is us that have failed. No-one should expect a free lunch, but times are difficult, I hope we can all work together and support the growth and keep this channel the magical place we know and love. Thank you Alex and team, I love escaping into your dreamy worlds of far away realities, and to be clear, I will still be here should you change it up a bit, but humbly I hope it mostly stays the same, it's what brought me here and what keeps me here.
    1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1