Hearted Youtube comments on World of Antiquity (@WorldofAntiquity) channel.
-
166
-
165
-
164
-
160
-
158
-
157
-
157
-
157
-
156
-
155
-
153
-
153
-
152
-
151
-
151
-
150
-
150
-
150
-
150
-
149
-
148
-
146
-
143
-
142
-
142
-
141
-
141
-
140
-
140
-
140
-
139
-
138
-
137
-
137
-
137
-
135
-
135
-
135
-
134
-
134
-
132
-
132
-
131
-
131
-
130
-
Honestly, what's most fascinating to me is how this video demonstrates the "evidence" selection process conducted by people who otherwise present themselves as reasonable and rational actors. The most believable figures and diagrams are snipped out of more outlandish publications, aligned with a pre-existing antipathy for the "intellectual elite," and then presented as a hidden body of evidence.
UnchartedX's quoted description of his being a "middle way" position speaks to the motives underlying this practice. By positioning the mainstream and the ancient aliens crowd as two diametrically opposed and equally wrong poles of equal weight, he's presenting his ideas as the reasonable approach.
The problem is, empirical data doesn't compromise. It can be revised, retested, recontextualized, reinterpreted, but there are certain things that the data cannot support. One person claiming the sky is blue and the other person claiming the sky is gray does not automatically mean that the sky is slate; it can mean that one observer is colorblind, or that the data for one observer was collected in Seattle.
EDIT: Okay, just got to the end and his rationale for dismissing the mainstream evidence, and it's... The biggest reach imaginable. Definitely didn't stick the landing if he's trying to claim that the rate of carbon decay is more falsifiable than painting a bullseye around a solstice.
129
-
128
-
126
-
126
-
124