Hearted Youtube comments on Adam Ragusea (@aragusea) channel.
-
84000
-
70000
-
24000
-
23000
-
20000
-
17000
-
15000
-
13000
-
12000
-
12000
-
10000
-
8700
-
8500
-
8500
-
8100
-
7900
-
6800
-
6800
-
6600
-
6500
-
6500
-
6500
-
6500
-
6400
-
6200
-
6100
-
6100
-
5800
-
5700
-
5500
-
5400
-
5200
-
5100
-
5000
-
5000
-
4900
-
4800
-
4600
-
4400
-
4200
-
4000
-
3900
-
3900
-
3700
-
3700
-
3600
-
3600
-
3600
-
3600
-
3500
-
3500
-
3500
-
3400
-
3100
-
3100
-
3000
-
3000
-
2900
-
2900
-
2800
-
2700
-
2700
-
2700
-
2600
-
2500
-
2500
-
2500
-
2500
-
2400
-
2400
-
2400
-
2400
-
2400
-
2400
-
2300
-
TIMESTAMPS!
#1 - 1:08 - What has life been like since you started amassing YouTube followers?
#2 - 2:36 - Who eats the food you make for videos?
#3 - 4:02 - What video are you most proud of (or do you just like the best)?
6:55 - Adam talks about his neighbor's kitchen, his kitchen, his desire to remain relatable, and an upcoming renovation
#4 - 10:21 - What is your skincare routine? You're glowing!
#5 - 12:12 - What's the process of making a video like? Just a quick "I do it in this order."
#6 - 18:04 - What do you listen to while you're cooking?
#7 - 18:38 - If you could magically master the cuisine of one culture or region, what would you choose?
#8 - 19:27 - If you could open up a restaurant, what kind of food would you serve?
20:35 - Lauren stops the dryer!
#9 - 20:55 - What are your favorite restaurants?
#10 - 22:47 - Which food YouTuber would you want to have cook a meal for you (and then maybe sit down and enjoy it with you)? (excluding celebrity chefs)
23:45 - Adam talks about putting your personality out in media and having fans talk to you as if they're your friends (and how he does the same thing sometimes)
26:49 - Adam briefly talks about an old job
#11 - 27:19 - Do you play the Nintendo Switch, or is it just your kids' Nintendo Switch?
#12 - 29:27 - What's your favorite cocktail/beer/wine/etc.?
#13 - 32:31 - Why don't you use wooden cutting boards? (Is this a whole video?)
#14 - 34:33 - What kitchen gadget do you think is a waste of money?
#15 - 36:34 - You don't do many breakfast recipes; what do you like to eat for breakfast?
#16 - 38:25 - I always love fresh herbs in my food, but when I buy some, I end up only using a little bit before the whole bunch goes bad and I have to throw it out, then I feel like I just threw out money. Suggestions?
#17 - 39:57 - What injuries have you gotten from cooking?
#18 - 42:39 - Let's say you found a time machine and it would allow you to see any 3 gigs (musical acts) in time; what would they be? It has to be 1 gig, not an entire festival, though gigs at festivals would be allowed.
#19 - 44:33 - Do you ever worry about running out of video ideas? And related, would you ever make videos about something other than cooking?
#20 - 47:23 - What are your goals for the channel in 2020, and what do we have to look forward to?
#21 - 49:50 - How do you feel when people approach you in real life? Have you been recognized? Have people approached you? What's that like?
53:59 - Closing words. Every two months seems like a good pace for ASK ADAM.
2200
-
2200
-
2200
-
2200
-
2100
-
2100
-
2000
-
2000
-
1900
-
1900
-
1800
-
1800
-
1800
-
1700
-
1600
-
1600
-
1600
-
1600
-
1600
-
1400
-
1400
-
1400
-
1400
-
1300
-
1300
-
1300
-
1200
-
1200
-
1200
-
1200
-
1200
-
1200
-
1200
-
1200
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
974
-
945
-
942
-
922
-
Molasses: used on its own in many recipes. Comes in its own container
White sugar: useful on its own in everything, shelf stable
Brown sugar: made by combining the above, requires special container, purchased separately, not shelf stable without special treatment, takes up additional cabinet space, far less versatile than its components, multiple types compound the issue, saves the labor of mixing sugar and molasses in a bowl when you’re already mixing other things in a bowl.
This is neither rocket science nor hard work. You offered a simple, cost-saving solution with zero compromise (and, it can be argued, improvements) and people are up in arms. Wild.
919
-
914
-
911
-
891
-
Just a kazakh here being happy that finally somebody said something nice about our country without mentioning Borat.
Fun fact, there is a type (?) of apple called apórt, they are exclusive to Almaty and are a real national treasure. They are huge, juicy, crispy and sweet as candy, but it's hard to find them and they are usually expensive. But if you get your hands on some wild mountain apórt apples, it's an experience you will never forget. Just thinking about them makes me want to time travel to a chilly September noon in Almaty eating aport and qurt during a hike.
So yeah, we love our apples and we are very proud of them (we even named a city after apples lmao). If you by any chance are planning to visit Almaty, come in September, there is such an abundance of absolutely delicious apples, pears and wildberries casually growing in the mountains.
890
-
879
-
860
-
857
-
830
-
813
-
786
-
771
-
769
-
751
-
724
-
723
-
715
-
701
-
687
-
687
-
681
-
674
-
670
-
661
-
661
-
656
-
650
-
645
-
637
-
637
-
624
-
623
-
608
-
603
-
597
-
588
-
579
-
577
-
552
-
548
-
544
-
514
-
500
-
487
-
480
-
480
-
466
-
465
-
461
-
458
-
455
-
453
-
448
-
448
-
447
-
447
-
439
-
438
-
436
-
432
-
432
-
425
-
423
-
420
-
404
-
399
-
393
-
393
-
388
-
387
-
383
-
378
-
375
-
363
-
357
-
355
-
353
-
349
-
343
-
342
-
342
-
340
-
340
-
331
-
327
-
320
-
319
-
314
-
314
-
306
-
304
-
301
-
289
-
287
-
281
-
276
-
275
-
273
-
266
-
259
-
245
-
245
-
242
-
242
-
236
-
227
-
226
-
225
-
From what I can tell, what that article refers to as "carbon deposition" has to do with why seasoning turns black, w/c isn't just because of the polymerization of oil. Polymerized oil is primarily dark brown. It turns black because as you cook with it, tiny particles of the food burn and turn to carbon black, which mixes into the oils that get polymerized. This happens naturally to cast iron, especially since a lot of people don't wash their pans with soap, leaving a lot of those burnt food particles to season into the pan along with the oil. Presumably, the article is saying that thick applications of oil will make a smaller proportion of carbon black into each layer of seasoning. I'm not entirely sold on how much the carbon really helps with the integrity of the seasoning, but I do believe that it is what makes seasoning deep black as it accumulates. Indeed, thick applications of oil risk making the surface of the pan sticky because the oil didn't polymerize completely. It leaving it under heat will eventually harden everything, but by then the layer will probably be very uneven, counteracting the non-stick properties of the seasoning. Those are my observations. I may not have controlled every variable and published my work in a journal, but I've done this obsessively over the past few years and it's what I know, even if I may not know everything about the process definitively. That's really what we mean these days when we say lived experience.
219
-
218
-
217
-
214
-
212
-
211
-
209
-
207
-
204
-
201
-
196
-
196
-
195
-
191
-
190
-
189
-
188
-
The cocoa powder is essentially dried, ground-up plants which means, naturally, it's high in fiber. Some types of fiber act as a hydrocolloid (the food kind) so it is entirely possible that the reconstitution of the cocoa powder when also paired with heat results in the water soluble fiber forming a hydrocolloid in a similar fashion to the gelatinisation process in cornflour. The water would also help "push" some oils from the cocoa powder, which then also gets emulsified. This means that not only is the cocoa powder's water-soluble flavourings being dispersed but so is the fat-soluble ones, and in a more even and uniform manner than previously. By heating the water and cocoa powder mixture earlier on, the cocoa powder can soak up more water - which makes perfect sense as many other things also can reach higher saturation if they are heated first (the first thing that comes to mind being sugar in water).
Now, the obvious question: wouldn't this happen in the unbloomed cocoa powder too?
Well, yes and no. By blooming the cocoa, you are giving it perfect conditions to get saturated and to gelatinise, emulsify, push out oils... etc. In the unbloomed cake, the cocoa powder is mixed with the water but as it is unheated it cannot absorb as much so less oil displacement occurs and little/no gelatinisation happens. Then, it is mixed with the other ingredients. These other ingredients, especially the flour and the egg which absorb and trap water respectively, reduce the amount of water the cocoa powder is able to absorb. Also, even if it does manage to absorb and gelatinise (which is harder without proper hydration) it is then trapped in these tiny pockets and furthermore less of the flavouring oils have been pushed out overall too, which means that there is mostly the water-soluble flavourings, which are transfered rather inefficiently through the cake. Ultimately, this means that the cake with the better dispersal, and with more oils mixing with the ingredients (especially the fat from things like the egg yolk or even fat from the cocoa powder itself), tastes better.
Hopefully this made sense <3
184
-
184
-
184
-
184
-
179
-
177
-
175
-
169
-
168
-
167
-
166
-
164
-
163
-
161
-
161
-
155
-
155
-
151
-
148
-
144
-
143
-
142
-
141
-
139
-
139
-
138
-
138
-
137
-
134
-
133
-
131
-
130
-
129
-
126
-
125
-
125
-
124
-
124
-
120
-
119
-
118
-
117
-
116
-
114
-
113
-
113
-
113
-
113
-
112
-
111
-
110
-
110
-
109
-
108
-
103
-
100
-
98
-
98
-
96
-
96
-
95
-
94
-
93
-
92
-
92
-
91
-
91
-
90
-
89
-
88
-
87
-
87
-
87
-
86
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
83
-
83
-
82
-
81
-
80
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
75
-
74
-
73
-
73
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
As Adam says, quoting Paracelsus, the dose makes the poison.
The quantities of food that Adam are holding in front of Poptart are almost certainly not enough to cause death, let alone real danger. Some also aren’t necessarily very attractive for dogs to eat. For instance, those 100 grams of very dark chocolate are extremely bitter. Unless the dog can “sense” the high fat content and finds that its desirability outweighs the deterrent of the bitterness, the dog won’t regard it as food. The milk chocolate is high in sugar, so obviously the dog would find that taste desirable and gobble it down, but 100 grams of milk chocolates contains very little theobromine, even compared to what’d be dangerous to a much smaller dog. Likewise that garlic… It’s unlikely the dog would instinctively eat garlic, if given the chance, or onion. The biggest risk, relative to what the dog might try to eat, are probably those sweet, sweet sugar-rich grapes, so if that was to happen, Adam would have to intervene, but he’d have plenty of intervention options and plenty of time, especially if holding the grapes at the time.
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
32
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@aragusea They're kinda right. The heat flux curve for water is s shaped, so water will boil violently in two regions. The first occurs when it departs from nucleate boiling, which occurs around 130 Celsius for water (provided i'm actually recalling the temperature properly, that's not 'around' as in approximate, but around as in littrealy in the region of 130C). At that point the heat flux is probably as high as you're going to get in a home kitchen and water will boil away very quickly. As the temperature increases past that, the steam produced creates an insulating layer and the heat flux decreases to the minimum at the leidenfrost point of water around 200 Celsius, after which it enters the film boiling regime and the heat flux increase again. While you're not going to exceed that peak heat flux, once you're looking at ~a hundred degrees past the leidenfrost point, it's more than enough to cause a small droplet to evaporate quickly.
[speculative] This is presumably a good temperature for the controlled browning that pancakes need because of that insulating effect. To low and nothing browns. Around 130 C, you're going to have really poor cooking due to how the water in the batter boils violently and still may not be hot enough to brown (so steamed pancakes bacily). Higher and surface of the pancake will reach to high of a temperature and burn. At 200 Celsius, it'll heat the batter up enough to brown it but the the heat flux is at a minimum so it will take awhile to get to that temperature and give the heat more time to distribute through the batter for more consistent cooking.[/speculative]
for practical purposes, good luck
holding a frying pan at 130 celsius unless you go well out of your way to do so. I don't even know why you'd want to; you either want it a fair bit below that (bare simmer) or well above that.
also yea 200 Celsius is not hot in cooking terms. That's about what you bake cupcakes at. Your pan will get way hotter than that searing a steak.
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1