Hearted Youtube comments on Not A Pound For Air To Ground (@notapound) channel.

  1. 387
  2. 354
  3. 348
  4. 282
  5. 160
  6. 154
  7. 148
  8. Thanks for making this. My dad flew (RO) the D/H/J models so I had him watch it. Here's his response: "By far the most complete and accurate video on the 89 I have seen. The only tiny error I noticed, though not about the 89, was when he mentioned the interim F-94C, the picture was an F-94B. I knew the 89 was historic, but this video really brings this fact home, and I flew every version except the early gun armed models. Very possibly, I am the most experienced 89 crew member left in the world. I remember the first time I ever saw a Scorpion. The commander of AF ROTC at NMSY (Las Cruces) flew some 6 of us students to attend an AF ROTC conference at, I believe it was Peterson AFB, Colorado. While standing around on the ramp at Peterson an F-89D taxied by; I was very much impressed, not realizing at the time that I soon would be flying that aircraft. Incidentally, at that conference I met a general, don’t recall his name, maybe Scott, who had been a Flying Tiger. So in my lifetime I have met two Flying Tigers, him and Bonington." What dad left out is that he flew the F-89D/H/J with the 76th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron at McCoy AFB. The 76th, along with the 74th and 75th FIS, are the descendant units of Claire Chennault's 1st American Volunteer Group (nicknamed Flying Tigers). So, not only did he meet two of the Tigers, he technically flew with them too. They fly A-10s now, and retain the original patch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/76th_Fighter_Squadron#/media/File:76th_Fighter-Interceptor_Squadron_-_Emblem.png Dad's next assignment was as "scope wizard" in the F-101B. It'd be fantastic if you could review this next. I'm sure he'd get a kick out of providing information, if you do. (FYI, his later assignments were RF-4C (100 Missions N Vietnam), and the F-111A/F)
    141
  9. 135
  10. 130
  11. 127
  12. 109
  13. 92
  14. 91
  15. 87
  16. 71
  17. 67
  18. 64
  19. 60
  20. 58
  21. 57
  22. 56
  23. 54
  24. 54
  25. 53
  26. 50
  27. 50
  28. 48
  29. 47
  30. 45
  31. 44
  32. 43
  33. 41
  34. 39
  35. 36
  36. 36
  37. 33
  38. 33
  39. 33
  40. 29
  41. 28
  42. 27
  43. 27
  44. 27
  45. 26
  46. 26
  47. 26
  48. 24
  49. 24
  50. 24
  51. 24
  52. 23
  53. 23
  54. 22
  55. 22
  56. 22
  57. 19
  58. 16
  59. 16
  60. 16
  61. 16
  62. 15
  63. 15
  64. 14
  65. 14
  66. 14
  67. 14
  68. 14
  69. 13
  70. 13
  71. 12
  72. 12
  73. 12
  74. 12
  75. There was another event in the late 1950s that exposed a gaping flaw in the US military's preferred fighter aircraft, when they were put to the test against surrogates of the Warsaw Pact's most numerous fighters. During Project Feather Duster, the F-100 Super Sabre, F-102 Delta Dagger, F-104 Starfighter, F-105 Thunderchief, and the newly-introduced F-4 Phantom II were pitted against what were judged to be the most similar aircraft in the US inventory to the Mig-17 Fresco and Mig-21 Fishbed; the F-86H Sabre and the F-5. The F-86H and F-5 took all the other aircraft to the woodshed. The outcome of Feather Duster was quickly and quietly walked-away from, systemically un-learned, and seldom mentioned again by the establishment --- despite the fact that it foresaged how poorly the US military's new fighters would fare against the Mig-17 and Mig-21 in the Vietnam War, which was only a few years away. In 1972, all US aircraft of all types achieved only 34 kills against VPAF fighters, while VPAF Mig-21s shot-down 54 US aircraft (not even including VPAF Mig-19s and Mig-17s, which also achieved another 4 victories between them, despite both the Mig-17 and Mig-19 being armed only with guns in VPAF service). By the time the competence of active VPAF pilots had overtaken the maximum possible competence of US pilots (VPAF pilots fought all tours of duty as pilots, while US pilots were forced to take a desk job every other tour, causing the skills of US pilots to atrophy from a lack of regular practice), US airpower operating within range of Migs was in big trouble. (Gee, how could we POSSIBLY have seen it coming?)
    12
  76. 12
  77. 11
  78. 11
  79. 11
  80. 10
  81. 10
  82. 10
  83. 10
  84. 9
  85. 9
  86. 9
  87. 9
  88. 9
  89. 9
  90. 9
  91. 9
  92. 8
  93. 8
  94. 8
  95. 8
  96. 8
  97. 8
  98. 8
  99. 8
  100. 8
  101. 8
  102. 7
  103. 7
  104. 7
  105. 7
  106. 7
  107. 7
  108. 7
  109. 7
  110. 7
  111. 7
  112. 6
  113. 6
  114. 6
  115. 6
  116. 6
  117. 6
  118. 6
  119. 6
  120. 6
  121. 6
  122. 6
  123. 6
  124. 6
  125. 5
  126. 5
  127. 5
  128. 5
  129. 5
  130. 5
  131. 5
  132. 5
  133. 5
  134. 5
  135. 5
  136. 5
  137. 5
  138. 5
  139. 5
  140. 4
  141. 4
  142. 4
  143. 4
  144. 4
  145. 4
  146. 4
  147. 4
  148. 4
  149. 4
  150. 4
  151. 4
  152. 4
  153. 4
  154. 4
  155. 4
  156. 4
  157. 4
  158. 4
  159. 4
  160. 4
  161. 4
  162. 4
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. 3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229. 2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. 2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1