Hearted Youtube comments on Rick Beato (@RickBeato) channel.
-
3500
-
3500
-
3400
-
3400
-
3400
-
3400
-
3400
-
3300
-
3300
-
3200
-
3200
-
3100
-
3100
-
3100
-
2900
-
2900
-
2900
-
2900
-
2900
-
2900
-
2800
-
Hey dear friend, I know you probably won't see this. But as a fellow YouTuber who goes through this constantly (and wins), I would like to pose an opposing view: given your stature in the industry, could it be time to start disputing these claims?
Before you dismiss this outright, consider that given your huge fanbase, you could be the one who makes a difference here.
I know it sounds like a major hassle, but it's really not that difficult and I would be happy to share the language my lawyer drafted up so you can use it.
Now I know that the reason you don't file disputes is because you want the artist to get paid which is quite noble.
But the reason that I'm suggesting an alternative course here is that the record companies are quite terrified of this actually going to court.
Not only do you have a completely valid claim for fair use, but if they decide to take you to court and you demonstrate fair use, they are open to HUGE liabilities in anti-SLAPP lawsuits (strategic lawsuits against public participation--basically lawsuits that are designed to prevent the powerful from intimidating you into censoring yourself).
Honestly, if they were foolish enough to issue a takedown and file a claim against you, they could potentially get hurt so badly they would never do so again.
You are a giant in this field Rick, consider that you might have the power in this case to make things better for others out there.
Warm regards,
Matt Ramsey
2800
-
2700
-
This might be of help - I've gotten a copyright strike once and when you go to dispute section there should be an email contact of someone who is in charge of that particular copyright. I wrote them an e-mail and explained myself, I was doing something similar to you, talking about a certain live performance and teaching people about singing a song like that through that example. I apologized for not asking for permission, asked nicely if they would be kind enough to remove the strike, told them that I am willing to delete the video, or if they agree, they can leave the video up but demonetized it. In a few days I got the response - apology accepted and that I should send the ID of the video that got the strike. Miraculously, they removed the strike, allowed the video to get published and even agreed to - shared revenue. So that dispute function can really be helpful, I actually use it often for blocked videos. Sometimes they respond and say that it is still blocked but I never got a strike after they disagreed with me - so that's a good thing. In most cases, nobody response, and after 30 days the video is fully up and all the revenue goes to me because they failed to respond withing the time period they have to response (which is 30 days). After that I think they can't demonetize it, block it, or anything later. Hope this is helpful, I know how much that sucks...
2700
-
2700
-
2700
-
2600
-
2600
-
2600
-
2600
-
2600
-
2600
-
2500
-
2500
-
2500
-
2500
-
2400
-
2400
-
2400
-
2400
-
2300
-
2300
-
2300
-
2200
-
2200
-
2200
-
2200
-
2200
-
2100
-
2100