Hearted Youtube comments on Styrman (@styrman1337) channel.
-
1700
-
425
-
420
-
287
-
249
-
176
-
147
-
135
-
128
-
127
-
118
-
117
-
115
-
106
-
88
-
82
-
76
-
75
-
75
-
67
-
59
-
57
-
52
-
50
-
48
-
47
-
45
-
43
-
43
-
41
-
40
-
36
-
Thank you very much, this is quality! I actually believe the "hakkaa päälle" was not originally so much a "warcry" but a charge order. And I believe it is a bad translation from swedish "hacka på" with the preposition "på" very clumsily translated as "päälle", as it is not good finnish language per se, I mean it is nowadays due to history of the phrase, but not otherwise. And it is quite long for a warcry, even if you think it in sport context, as more effective shout for battle and sport fields would contain something like two or three syllables max. Finnish cavalry didn't, according to some sources, actually warcry at all, instead of said charge order, and that is why the enemy were freaked out by them also --they were used at this day and age to some kind of cries and shouts during the attack, but finnish troops just approached in full silence. So, perhaps the charge order "Hakkaa päälle" which was the only thing they were heard to shout, became their name. Please excuse me the length of this comment, Hackapells are just a subject matter I have been very much into for the last couple of years.
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
A wonderful video. It is very plausible that the region of Garðar referred to in old Norse sagas and runestones was not in fact Russia but Pomerania. It would have gotten this name from its many cities (garðr, городъ, гардъ). Many legendary Saga kings were described as kings of Garðar, including Odin. This, along with many other illogical factors including a lack of and the existence of evidence disproving it, leads me to believe that there was no real Slavic migration and that these Wends, doubtlessly connected to the Vandals, Lugi, Rugi, lived in these lands long before the 6th or 7th century. The truth is that in the past the line between "Slav" and "German" was blurred. These peoples lived together, mixed and mingled, had a common origin and languages that at the time were very close indeed.
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
A very well-made video! I have now watched it four times already, these four days. I like it how you present the varying view points made based on how sparse the evidence is, that leaves room for much legitimate speculation of highly differing viewpoints.
I myself am however biased due to my Swedish descent to lean towards the, here in this video, presented scale end of there indeed being a Norman influence. This because it is a source of pride. Very human indeed. I still can take joy in the great deeds of neighboring peoples such as the Slavs, that also does have a rich, interesting, glorious history as our own in many respects. That our histories are intertwined through the centuries, and even millennia, is something we are together exploring. On the road to knowledge, every view point is valid for consideration. Over time, more and more evidence is being unearthed. These waters are however highly politicized, and therefore muddied by these biases. Something we all have to keep in mind. Being watchful for science, remaining untainted from the sort of corruption that always want to enter there from political influences.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
No, there isn't, that's a speculation. The most probable ethymology of Gospodin/Gospodar:
"Most likely, related to Latin "hospes" (hospitable friend, host; a guest, a stranger) and comes from Indo-European "*ghosti-pot-s", in which the first component is "*ghostis" (guest), which has lost the ti within the word, as often happens in words of the title type;
The second component is Indo-European "*pot(i)s" (lord, ruler) (compare to related Lithuanian "pàts" (himself; man), Latin "potis" (mighty), Ancient Indian "pátiḥ" (lord, husband), which often acts as the second component of compound words, Greek "δεσ-πότησ" (master, lord, lit. "lord of the house"), Lithuanian "viẽš=pat(i)s" (lord).
The original meaning, therefore, should have been "master of the guests", which was connected with the ancient custom, according to which the guests enjoyed the protection and care of the master of the house, like other members of his family."
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1