Hearted Youtube comments on Anders Puck Nielsen (@anderspuck) channel.

  1. He didn't humiliate Zelensky. He just tried to.
    3800
  2. Europe needs to buy European made military equipment and not depend on the US equipment
    2600
  3. I remember in December 2021 and January 2022, the ‘alarmists’ were also claiming that Russia would invade Ukraine…
    2400
  4. As a retired economist in the UK I must commend your explanation Anders. They are basically suffering cost push inflation, due to shortages of labour, higher raw material costs mainly due to sanctions and higher interest charges on capital investment. But there is also the double whammy in some areas where huge wages being paid to workers in the industrial military complex and soldiers who sign a contract to fight are causing inflation on the basis of too much money chasing too few goods. There is now a massive structural problem in the economy. I have said to Russian friends since the invasion that the Central Bank Governor has done a very good job given the hand she was dealt and the tools at her disposal. But I have also said she can only perform a miracle for a short period of time. It is clear she is being set up for blame. Putin's words saying there must be another way to control inflation is disingenuous. He knows the only other way is to cut government spending, which he will not do whilst the war continues. I think if the war continues the Russian economy could go bust and crash in 2025. The west needs to keep up the pressure.
    2200
  5. Unfortunately, Mike Johnson knows exactly what he's doing. He can't say no to Ukrainian help outright so instead he's setting up conditions where it would be impossible to provide enough information to satisfy him so that the vote can happen and at the same time, he can blame the Dems / Admin that it's their fault for not providing sufficient information. It's not lack of understanding, it's despicable political tactic how to deny Ukraine the help and blame the administration for it.
    2100
  6. Rule 1 of war: Don't pick a fight with countries who are richer than you. Rule 2 if war: Don't pick a fight with countries whose friends are richer than you.
    2000
  7. The sad truth is that the USA has been a questionable ally for a long long time. We saw the writing on the wall 8 years ago. The real question is, why are we not prepared?
    1400
  8. Thank you for standing with Ukraine
    1300
  9. When you are right you are right, take the credit Anders. You are the most accurate commentator on this stupid war, thank you for your efforts.
    1300
  10. Speaker Johnson has no intention of ever allowing a vote in the House for Ukraine aid. He is just trying to sound reasonable by asking for a detailed strategy.
    1200
  11. As a dane, I am very proud we have people of your caliber in our defense
    1200
  12. Bro, Trump and Vance can't differentiate between internal politics and foreign affairs. They looked like two fools.
    1100
  13. Mr. Nielsen, as a Ukrainian, I want to thank you for being an advocate of freedom and Ukraine. This means a lot to me, and without people like you we would have a much tougher time dealing with evil
    1100
  14. SO important video! This is a must see for EVERYONE
    1100
  15. The reality is that, if Ukraine had just given up Bakhmut, the SAME battle (a strong Wagner v a strong Ukraine) would be happening in Khasiv Yar, or Kramatorsk etc. In other words, that battle HAD to happen somewhere. Wagner had to be stopped and destroyed somewhere. So better Bakhmut than the next town or the next...
    1100
  16. If Russia invades a piece of Finland, then Finland will go to war for it. We won't wait the Americans to come here and then go to war. And if Finland is at war, then article 5 will HAVE to be used, otherwise it's completely useless. And I have no trust issues, that at least Norway, who also has a border with Russia, and Sweden, who also has areas in the high north, would assist Finland, and I'm sure Poland would also contribute, alongside the Netherlands, and the UK. Maybe even Estonia and the Baltics would directly aid the war effort with troops, even when they themselves would be at real danger at that moment. Who knows what the US would do under Trump, but Finland also has bilateral agreements with countries, one of them being the US.
    1000
  17. John Mearsheimer in Feb 2022: "Putin has no reason to invade Ukraine, he doesn't need to, he's already won." Mearsheimer in 2023: "The Russian invasion of Ukraine was a rational act." For those wondering, the latter is the title of an article/book chapter Mearsheimer wrote, which was published by Yale University Press. How people (including those at prestigious universities) take this guy seriously I do not understand. His theory of politics involves ignoring the role of ideology, emotion, and incomplete/inaccurate information in decision making. In other words, he removes the essence of politics from his theory of political action. Can anyone think of a single political figure, current or historical, who was entirely unaffected by those factors?
    835
  18. Respect to you and Ben Hodges for making the right calls.
    746
  19. The reason TV cameras were there was to show an opponent submitting to Trump on TV. Trump is used to people submitting to him and kissing his ring. Republicans in Congress have reinforced this thinking. When Zelensky would not submit and kiss Trump's ring, Trump lost anything resembling composure that he had.
    738
  20. I am Ukrainian (originaly from Crimea), and all I want to say is - YES! Thank you for actually listening for what we are saying.
    726
  21. This channel is the voice of reason! Thank you Sir!
    604
  22. Very few people in the US are millionaires while everyone in Zimbabwe is millionaire. Clearly US needs to take lessons from Zimbabwe's economic model.
    556
  23. Anders, for a non-economist, you did a pretty good job connecting the dots on the Russian economy. Well done, sir.
    528
  24. Just one detail that I think is important: the algorithm is NOT open source. Some code for the algorithm was made public at some point last year but no updates have ever been published so we can safely assume that what is published and what is run have no relation to one another. This was all just a(nother) publicity stunt.
    517
  25. You are as always the voice of reason. Thank you 🙏
    472
  26. This gives me similarities from the Brusilov offensive in WWI, where using these human waves Russians managed to annihilate Austro-Hungarian army. But the cost was so high, that Russian army lost it's offensive capability and the morale in army and home front plummeted. At that time, the average number of kids in the Russian family was five. Now it is a little over one. The mothers of Russian soldiers are already rising their voices against the treatment of their sons and like in Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, this could become a real problem for Kremlin.
    446
  27. Thank you, Anders. Your videos are must watch productions.
    442
  28. Probably the best take on this topic I've ever heard. Many thanks from Ukraine!
    408
  29. Thank you Anders!
    408
  30. I am remined of Vlad Vexler saying that by attempting to predict a state's actions without looking at the internal functions of the state, Realist theorists are effectively trying to judge the quality of a restaurant by looking at photos of it on google maps
    386
  31. Great video Anders. Your channel continues to be the only one where I will never skip a video.
    383
  32. Fantastic Anders! The Kremlin will accept that we think we believe in these norms, but not that we actually believe in them.
    378
  33. Great analysis as always. The stubborn defense of Bakhmut has always been a great dilemma for the Ukrainians, but it may indeed have been worth it... and probably they were even hoping for a bigger collapse on the Russian side, which was another theoretical possibility...
    374
  34. For the media, the definition of an expert is - A person that will answer the phone early morning so the quote can hit the morning news.
    366
  35. Anders, please keep making predictions and analysis! You are honestly one of the only voices I feel I can trust on Ukraine.
    361
  36. "The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    325
  37. Thank you for the voice of reason. I've stopped bothering to follow or listen to sites that know nothing about how war works and the importance of logistics. Budanov told us months ago these months would be difficult and territory could be lost. Clearly content creators are more interested in hearing themselves talk than listen to Ukraine. Excellent analysis from you. Thanks again.
    319
  38. The great part of this channel is it doesn't overload. Concise and occasional videos. Would like to see more of the big picture view/analysis of the war. Thank you!
    301
  39. Thank you Anders!
    294
  40. Great analysis as always Anders - I also enjoyed your contributions on Jake Broe's podcasts - thanks for agreeing to be part of that.
    293
  41. BTW, your interview on John Fink’s Silicon Curtain should be required viewing for political leaders / advisors + military decision makers.
    291
  42. You are absolutely right. Mistakes need to be openly discussed to improve.
    283
  43. Always glad to see your content Anders regardless of its length. Your commentary on this war is one of my favorite sources for its accuracy and responsibility to be accurate. Thank you Anders , here’s your next beer on me
    275
  44. Tak, Anders. Det er godt at vide, at vi har så kompetente folk i Forsvaret som dig.
    273
  45. You give the best analysis on the war against Ukraine 🙌💪
    256
  46. Dear Sir, Do not stop making videos, please. Normal folks rarely have access to "professionals" such as yourself. Informing, the way you do, is appreciated. Thank you.
    255
  47. Thank you Mr. Nielsen for your intelligent content that is still transparent and honest. I wish I could give more. I feel more informed after every one of your posts. Good luck sir with your ongoing issues with YT. It is so unfortunate that YT does this because this platform is by far the best way to get your content to the masses and YT knows this
    243
  48. Few other issues which makes sea drones hard to target. 1. The curvature of the Earth. If your radar is 5m off the water, at 10km, 0.3m (over a foot) is obscured. If the drone is 1m high and you have 0.5m waves (pretty calm), the most you can see is 20cm of the craft. 2. Speed. A typical speed boat running 45 knots is closing at about 1 km ever 40 seconds. Even if you can "see" it at 2.5km, you could have less than two minutes for someone to scan a five or six square kms of ocean. 3. Vision. Darkness, fog, rain, sun in your eyes, etc. can all make it all but impossible to see those distances. Further, if you are in harbour and anchored you probably have coastline, rocks, islands, other ships, etc. 4. Other attacks/distractions. Air attacks, air drones nearby, etc. can easily get your attention. Naval drones can use smoke screens, flares, lights, radar reflecting panels, chaff dispensers, etc. to draw attention. A drone 5km out with a blinking light and aluminum panels is going to draw attention. 5. They are almost impossible to target. They are too small and moving too fast for missiles or large gun systems to target with any radar-based system. Something like a 50mm gun would need a thermal or night vision site and they are hard pressed to hit things the size of people moving quickly with single shot weapons and they pretty much need direct hits. A raid firing 30mm system might, but most of these are radar guided for use against aircraft. When aimed at something 3km away on the horizon, they can't easily spray and area. Most visually aimed heavy and machine guns typically don't have thermal sights, can't easily be aligned to radar or thermal directions (i.e. the gunner needs to visually see the target even if the ship's radar or thermals could see it), and realistic ranges are likely in the sub 1km range. (i.e. you have less than 45 seconds). etc. This said, there are things other navies can do which help -- staying out at sea, moving, using thermal imaging systems, smoke screens, patrol boats further out, nets and sea fencing around ports, or specific ships, proximity detonating mines/buoys around ships, laser grid detection, radar on smaller patrol ships, acoustic sensors, GPS/data sharing (so you know where your own ships are), etc.
    228
  49. So good to have you back, Anders. Saw your interview in Deadline which was very eye-opening for me :) You see the broader perspectives clearly, and is very good at explaining things in a way we civilians understand and thereby broadening at least my understanding of various topics. Thanks for that, and yes please keep it coming.
    214
  50. Just love it when a new post notification pops up from you.
    209
  51. To my mind, the "responsibility ownership" message was quite explicit. In the very opening of Prigozhin's "obituary" by Putin, one gets: "He was a man with a difficult fate, and he made serious mistakes in life" before falling into the "de mortuis nil nisi bonum" pattern. Besides, Putin could have chosen to say nothing publicly about Prigozhin's death, I think that his choice to do it brings even more significance into what he said.
    208
  52. Greetings and praise to Anders. You're certainly one of the best analysts on the war in Ukraine. Always intriguing and interesting to listen to and learn from. Kudos.
    191
  53. Always love your vids. Best analysis on YouTube
    190
  54. As always, I enjoy your insights into the chaos that is Russia and its war.
    156
  55. Thank You! I missed this kind of analysis in other media. You delivered it!
    154
  56. Thank you for this excellent analysis Anders!
    148
  57. You analysis is on point, concise, and enlightening. It's heartening to see your viewership has grown to 175K viewers. I can see it expanding to ten times that. All the best to you.
    143
  58. Western Media: I talked to 10 Ukrainian soldiers all saying that the war is difficult I talked to 0 Russian soldiers Clearly the Ukrainians are massively losing as 10 more Ukrainian soldiers told us they are struggling than Russian soldiers told us the same. It is depressing to see the defeatism that happens just because people hear more news from Ukraine than from Russia, every single one of these people would have said the Soviets would obviously lose ww2 if put in Moscow in 41.
    140
  59. Option 3: Large air cannon and frozen chickens. Next helicopter to cross the border gets a birdstrike.
    139
  60. One of your most enlightening videos so far. Thank you.
    137
  61. Oi, not the scary tranquil forest again, now YT is going to demonetise for sure for copyrighted singing birds.
    136
  62. Thank you, Anders! I really appreciate your analyses. Just hope that one day you would have more optimistic data for us.
    112
  63. We need more people like you explaining what's really happening. Thanks!
    107
  64. A maritime provocation is also possible. Would NATO go to war over some uninhabited rocks in the Baltic, for example?
    104
  65. A difficult video to make as there will be advocates who do not see this point of view. You have shown courage and that is a great thing.
    101
  66. Thank you very much for this report!😊
    100
  67. Brilliant Analysis, Anders. When people talk about empathy, what they really mean is often compassion. But that is really only one side of it, and people often neglect to talk about the other one, because it's a much darker one. Some people really do have bad intentions, some people really don't care about the well-being of others, some people really won't listen to reason, and understanding and acknowledging all of that is also a form of empathy. And regarding the bragging, we should never forget the wise words of Muhammad Ali: “It's not bragging if you can back it up!”
    97
  68. Keep up the good work Anders! Best voice on this conflict next to perun! 🙏
    95
  69. Great analysis as always. All supporters of Ukraine must do everything they can to ensure the next US president is Harris.
    92
  70. Thank you Anders!
    91
  71. Thank you very much Anders!
    90
  72. Jeg ser altid frem til dine videoer, som er så uddybende og oplysende. Vore nyhedsmedier belyser ikke krigen i Ukraine tilstrækkeligt, så tak fordi du deler din store viden og dine kompetencer med os.
    88
  73. Wow! That's exactly what I thought, when this comparison came out, but I wouldn't be able to analyze it as brilliant, as you did! Excellent!
    84
  74. Thank you Anders! Nourishingly sensible as always. It’s a good question how close Putin is to a certain recruitment limit, beyond which he will need to face new levels of evasion and resistance. I don’t know. But I think he is concerned about this, and knows the solution must be further politicisation. 🌻
    80
  75. “This video is probably going to be short”…12:50 min 😂 I could listen forever though so I’m not complaining.
    77
  76. Congratulations on 200k , been around since you had like 40k 🤯
    74
  77. Tak Anders for endnu en god video.
    73
  78. Thanks so much for your take Anders - you capture it.
    70
  79. I feel I am well informed and have thought about the ramifications of all that I know is in play, then I hear another Anders podcast and realize there are more layers to that onion. Thanks Anders, I appreciate your insight 👍 From a former US naval aviator, now a Texas resident watching closely from afar.
    68
  80. Tak for dine videoer! :)
    65
  81. Firstly, thank you for a great video once again! And to comment on the narratives as someone who moderates a semi-large discussion platform/forum and have therefore seen my share of the 'Internet Research Agency' spin-cycles during the last years especially. It seems that right now that there's increased Russian troll activity going on from what I've seen across the net at least on the English speaking side of things, and the narratives seem to swing every which way but mostly their goal right now seems to be to question and confuse the discussion as much as possible. Most of the clearest cases comments coming from the troll brigade of St. Petersburg I've seen disregard the narrative-side entirely and focus on criticising the channel or person presenting it (comments such as "western propaganda is insane", "The [host/journalist/expert] is such a loser" etc). The fact that they're not really even trying to come up with a plausible explanation about how and why this would be a Ukrainiann or a western operation and instead are essentially just s*hitposting at full speed is really telling to me: they're panicking (and by them I mean the information warfare side of the Kremlin). They have no plan, so the only remaining move is to just basically throw everything at the wall and hope that people move on and forgte that putin was warned and he publically laughed at the idea. This lack of any cohesion, any kind of plan of action is in my opinion very very revealing, and supports the theory that this is indeed not a false flag.
    60
  82. There are TWO channels I click LIKE before I've seen the full video. Yours and Peruns. Always fantastic quality 🙂
    58
  83. Very informative like always. Keep up the good work Anders!
    54
  84. Thank you, I was waiting for your take on this.
    52
  85. Tak for foredraget i Holstebro i går. Det var hyggeligt at møde dig. 🙂
    51
  86. Anders you are an all too rare voice of well-informed reason. Thank you for what you are doing, sharing your honest, balanced expertise.
    45
  87. I have watched your channel for two years, and appreciated all of your commentary on the Ukraine war. This was the most solid, useful, incisive of any of them. Thank you 🙂
    45
  88. Thank you 🙏 Your understanding and strong voice makes me feel better in this moment.
    39
  89. Wow! This is a really mindblowing video with an insight and understanding that is really on the spot. Thank you so much for your contribution Anders. Hilsen Sturla fra Norge
    35
  90. Can’t wait to see your colab with perun!
    35
  91. Tak!🙏
    35
  92. You are the best at analyzing the war in Ukraine. Raise your hand higher Mr. Nielsen, you were and continue to be right, your opinion needs to be heard. It is not bragging, it is pointing up facts. Keep up your excellent work, it´s always a pleasure to hear your opinion.
    34
  93. THank you Anders. I see you got rid of the atom bomb. I hope your tie is ok. Your discussion is gold.
    34
  94. Thank you !
    34
  95. Thanks! What would we do without you? Many You Tube channels are great, but far fewer are the ones like yours that we can watch without bias.
    32
  96. Tak for endnu en god analyse
    31
  97. Hi Anders, Thank you. Always clear precise logical thoughts on this current issue. I guess a better picture may present itself as each month passes. Great posts
    30
  98. Congratulations for your book. Quite an achievement !
    29
  99. Very insightful! Thanks Anders!
    27
  100. Great insights... thanks!! Highlighting the insight Putin has chosen his fight along half the border length Ukraine has had to defend is significant. As is highlighting the insight that, now that Ukraine has forced Putin to defend the full length of the border, the conscripts will join the fighting... death is now coming to Moscow. Although not highlighted, forcing Russia to defend the full length of the border also explains Lukashenko's recent vocal despair.... Belarus' border is also being pulled into the war.
    26
  101. Thank you for the warning Anders. For those who wish to put extra effort into fighting these scams: 1) Open the fake channel. Find the "report" option. Report them for "impersonating others". The process will ask about the original channel being impersonated. It's the channels address line that is to be used. See 2) 2) Open Anders' (or whoever is being impersonated) channel. Copy the adress line at the top. Note: It has to be the front channel page, only that will work, not any sub-page ending with "../videos" or such. 3) Back in the reporting process, at the end you can add extra info like that "the real channel itself warns about these scams" or such, if you wish. After reporting the fake channel I go back to my notification and any nearby fake posts from the scammer and report them as "unwanted commercial/ spam" since the posts are "copy-paste" spammed everywhere. If you have the time you can go through the comment section and report all those you find. To do this first "sort by newest" to find them bunched together. There's a chance it helps but we can't know, and it does take time. Please do be careful only to report the fake posts and not accidentally report some real comment, it can be a difficult task to reverse a report. Good hunting.
    25
  102. Thank you for your insightful videos, sounds spot on!
    23
  103. Living not far from one of the landing site of US troops during the invasion of Panama, we are getting connected in a very unexpected way...
    23
  104. Tack!
    22
  105. Outstanding analysis, thank you so much Anders!
    22
  106. On reflection I agree with your assessment not Michael’s
    20
  107. Excellent as always, thanks Anders.
    20
  108. Tillykke med bogen😊 den skal læses
    16
  109. Thanks for sharing your expertise and analysis with everyone!
    14
  110. Thanks!
    13
  111. Thanks!
    13
  112. Thanks!
    13
  113. Obrigado!
    13
  114. Hi Anders, Thanks very much for your discussion concerning Twitter & social media platforms. I found it fascinating and in depth, but presented in a way that a non-expert could fully understand and appreciate. I learned a lot from your short video and encourage you to make other videos not focused solely on the Ukraine war. I eagerly await and seek your videos because of your thorough and in depth knowledge of the subject matter. You are doing an excellent job and I want to encourage to keep up the great work. Congratulations! John Murphy
    13
  115. Thanks!
    13
  116. Thank you.
    12
  117. Thanks!
    12
  118. I would've been very surprised to hear something else from you. Great to see myself on your side once more.
    12
  119. Thanks a lot for your work, Anders! Much appreciated.
    11
  120.  @anderspuck  Good on you for staying in your own lane and not BSing everyone.
    11
  121. Great video. And apparently you speak Russian, too. You keep impressing me. :)
    11
  122. Thanks! I was expecting you to also talk about the possibility of using a deterrence strategy against sabotage.
    11
  123. Bedankt
    11
  124. Great video.
    11
  125. Thanks for sticking with it despite YouTube siding with the trolls. You add clarity, and that's what keeps your real audience coming back
    10
  126. Tak!
    10
  127. Thank you for the great analytical work!
    10
  128. Just finished your book. Thanks for a easy updated read about modern war.
    10
  129. Thanks
    9
  130. It is the main thing I don't understand with the Kharkiv and talk of maybe another Sumy attack, Ukraine have large forces tied up on borders where they were not able to be used efficiently. I keep hearing that Russia has a manpower advantage along the active frontline because it has 4-500k against Ukraine's 3-400k, but that Russia has just around 500k+ in total for the war and Ukraine has 900k active soldiers. Why allow Ukraine to use its larger force and on defensive actions as well. I could maybe see an argument for Russia thinking it has a large enough material advantage to believe spreading out would force Ukraine to prioritise supplying some fronts over others, but even if that ended up working the result of that would be a siege of large cities that Russia just does not have the manpower to encircle or fight trough. Extension of the frontline just isn't something Russia can get a long term advantage off, it allows Ukraine to utilize more men that were tied up and ineffective for the war effort. Personally I don't see Russia as having a chance to win the war as I hold the 2 key beliefs that Ukraine will never give up and the West will never stop supplying Ukraine, the west will in my opinion just keep increasing capacity and eventually go far beyond what Russia has the capacity for. But with that note out of the way, if I were Russia and I absolutely wanted to keep going and trying for victory this Kharkiv attack just does not make any sense with the resources dedicated for it. It has to be just a propaganda move, throwing away resources and putting Russia in an even worse position just to show that it is still capable of taking territory. Whether to show Ukraine/The West, internal population or both how Russia is still "winning", some commander wanted to show off how good he was or to show that it is taking the incursions into Belgorod seriously idk, but it definitely is not because it is a viable offensive.
    9
  131. For a military nerd you did well explaining macroeconomics
    9
  132. Tak!
    9
  133. Thanks, really appreciate your analysis of all this
    9
  134. Thanks! Appreciate your perspective.
    9
  135. Thanks!
    8
  136. Alas, I cannot read Danish. However, I will lobby some of our publishers, the book sounds interesting.
    8
  137. ¡Gracias!
    8
  138.  @anderspuck  Perun is awesome, can't wait to see the conversation
    8
  139. Interesting analysis, i agree, but i think the situation was not much different in WW2. The main axis members were there for convenience reasons and not really helping each other too much. If your ideology is that tour nation is the best, that it’s special, that kinda hinders any real alliance, intended as sincere collaboration to find win-win and help each other.
    8
  140. Very informative, thank you so much! I just subscribed to your newsletter to support your work
    8
  141. Thanks! You are doing an amazing job informing and explaining!😊
    7
  142. Tak!
    7
  143. Thanks for talking about this
    7
  144. Analysis of such quality and critical insight is what i would love to see established as standard for public broadcast journalism. You're doing a great job, thank you.
    7
  145. Thanks! Jeg takker også Anders. og håber at flere vil sende private donationer mod Ukraine. Jeg syntes det ser lidt sort ud lige nu, men det er jo altid mørkest lige før solopgang.
    7
  146. Thanks!
    7
  147. As always, thank you for the consistent, up-to-date, logical analysis.
    7
  148. This is a great video. At first, I didn't really care about the Russian state's view of the ICC and wasn't planning on viewing the video. However, it's a very pertinent and interesting analysis and I'm very happy to have seen it. Great job!! 👍👍
    7
  149. Tak!
    6
  150. Thanks! Knowledge is power. Thanks for helping me understand Russia in a way that no other source does.
    6
  151. People are, not is. Love your analysis.😊
    6
  152. Very, very well described! I circumnavigated the world on a sailboat. Seaclutter is a real problem if one wants to detect small to mid sized objects in any kind of weather.
    6
  153. Thanks so much Anders, this was needed!
    6
  154. Thanks!
    6
  155. Danke!
    6
  156. Takk!
    6
  157. Thanks
    6
  158. Thanks!
    6
  159. Danke!
    6
  160. Thank you for taking a step back from the headlines and giving a sober perspective of the bigger picture. I wish more people heard your voice!
    6
  161. The estimates for Ukraine include civilian deaths btw. That 70k number way overestimates the number od dead Ukrainian SOLDIERS. The estimates for Russia do not. This is extremely important when estimating force availability.
    5
  162. Appreciate the depth of your analysis
    5
  163. Danke!
    5
  164. This book needs to be released in English! I want it!!
    5
  165. Your content is destination-viewing for me! Thank you for the clear, sober, well-researched analysis.
    5
  166. Thanks!
    5
  167. 0:27 I'm glad you make these type of videos. Not commenting on the specific information within this video, I'm talking in general which is why I didn't put it in the main post body
    5
  168. Found you through Perun and your upcoming collab. Crazy how ive been following Perun (who is also brilliant) from the other side of the globe, and I necer found you that is basically my neighbour... And what a find, you are a gem. Salutes from Sweden, always nice with rational voices having an outlet. Wonderful stuff, subscribed!
    4
  169. Thanks!
    4
  170. Thanks!
    4
  171. Thanks! :trophy-yellow-smiling: Deep understanding is difficult and precious.
    4
  172. Thanks!
    4
  173. Thanks!
    4
  174. Thanks a lot for this insightful overview!
    4
  175. I'm no expert but what if Ukraine manages to reach the Crimea border and suddenly threatens to liberate Crimea. Imagine Putin telling his audience, that they conquered a village in Donbass, but at the same time lost Crimea. I believe when the first Ukrainian soldier steps foot on Crimea, Putin will start to negotiate and withdraw his troops.
    4
  176. Thanks!
    4
  177. Fantastic thank you Anders!
    4
  178. Payload and radar superiority.
    4
  179. Thanks
    4
  180. Thanks!
    4
  181. Thanks for the thoughtful analysis. Nathan from Portland, Oregon
    4
  182. I appreciate your thoughts.
    4
  183. Thanks! You are my only trusted source of analysts in this "fog of war."
    4
  184. Thanks!
    4
  185. I wanted to make a video like this. Now how do I do it without sounding I just copied your homework? Great video, as always!
    4
  186. Thanks!
    4
  187. Thanks
    4
  188. Thanks!
    4
  189. Thanks!
    4
  190. Kiitos!
    4
  191. Russia is making a mistake... nooooo, that can not be.
    4
  192. Thanks!
    4
  193. Tak!
    3
  194. Thanks!
    3
  195. Thanks!
    3
  196. Ser frem til at læse din bog som jeg var så heldig, at få i julegave😂
    3
  197.  @anderspuck  The U.S. Navy retired the MQ-8B and replaced it with the MQ-8C. THe MQ-8C designation is interesting given that the 8B was based off of the Schwiezer 333 helicopter wheras the 8C is based off of the Bell 407.
    3
  198. Tak!
    3
  199. Thanks!
    3
  200. Tak!
    3
  201. Tak!
    3
  202. Hej Anders. 🇩🇰 Tak for dine video og den tid du gider at ligge i alt det arbejde du gør. Vi er mange der er utrolig glad for det. Din troværdighed, ærlighed, viden og baggrund. Du evner at få alle til at forstå hvad der sker og til at give et større overblik over hvad der sker, for almindelig mennesker uden erfaring inden for krig. Stort super tak for det. Knus fra Charlotte fra Brønshøj 👍🏼🥰🇩🇰
    3
  203. Tak!
    3
  204. Thanks
    3
  205. ​@anderspuck I believe I heard that on the telegraph podcast, Ukraine: The Latest, but I couldn't provide you with a specific episode
    3
  206. Takk!
    3
  207. My Ukrainian War knowledge goes up 10% every time you post. And yes, buy a beer for a couple friends,,,
    3
  208. Thanks!
    3
  209. Thanks!
    3
  210. Thanks!
    3
  211. Merci !
    3
  212. Thanks!
    3
  213. Your insight is much appreciated. Please run for office someday. Ben Hodges should have.
    3
  214. Tak!
    3
  215. Thanks!
    3
  216. Thanks!
    3
  217. Thank you for your work, Anders! 🙏
    3
  218. Thank you! As usual, I agree 100%. I think you can be proud that you have pretty reasonable comments here in on YT, not like some other posts, I have seen in the last days here. Let me say this: Ultimately, Ukraine will have to pay for its own Air Force. So Ukraine needs its industrial East and access to Black Sea in oder to pay for its air force.
    3
  219.  @anderspuck  Thanks again for the analysis, KD Nielsen. FYI, I'm already subscribed to your Logic of War newsletter, but I didn't receive a notification from it for this video. BTW, are power plants legitimate military targets?
    3
  220. Thanks!
    3
  221. Thanks!
    3
  222. I like your unbiased opinions. Thanks!
    3
  223. Thanks Anders!
    3
  224. Thanks!
    3
  225. Thanks!
    3
  226. Thanks!
    3
  227. Your analysis of the dynamics around military analysis was ballsy and rang true.
    3
  228. Tak!
    3
  229. Be well, and thanks for your excellent work. Slava Ukraini!🇺🇦🌻🇺🇦
    3
  230. Thanks!
    3
  231. Thank you.
    3
  232. Tack!
    3
  233. Thanks!
    3
  234. Please publish an english version!
    3
  235. Grazie.
    3
  236. Tak!
    2
  237. Thanks!
    2
  238. Thanks!
    2
  239. Very informative and brilliant analysis as always. Thank you
    2
  240. Thanks!
    2
  241. Thanks
    2
  242. Tak!
    2
  243. Thanks! Worth the cup of coffee.
    2
  244. Thanks!
    2
  245. Thanks!
    2
  246. Tak!
    2
  247. Tak!
    2
  248. Hotel Lord Nelson is sooo cosy 😊 God bedring!
    2
  249. Tak!
    2
  250. Thanks!
    2
  251. Tak!
    2
  252. Thanks!
    2
  253. Tak!
    2
  254. Thanks!
    2
  255. Thanks!
    2
  256. Thanks!
    2
  257. Kiitos!
    2
  258. Great video, once more!
    2
  259. 4:22 How can you say americans don't have a plan? Did you not hear our VP, JD Vance, say that he has seen some clips of the war on TV?
    2
  260. So Ukrainians are literally fighting for Niu York… That’s a tragically beautiful reflection of reality that they are also fighting for the benefit of New York
    2
  261. Several aircraft taken down and some dozen servicemen killed is not "unisono" sign.
    2
  262. Thanks!
    2
  263. Tak!
    2
  264. Thanks
    2
  265. Dear Anders, Witkoff already admitted that the russian Istanbul protocol will be considered the guidepost for the current Trump Administration.
    2
  266. Thanks
    2
  267. Kiitos!
    2
  268. Thanks
    2
  269. Thank you Anders!
    2
  270. Thanks!
    2
  271. Thanks
    2
  272. Thanks
    2
  273. Thanks!
    2
  274. ✅
    2
  275. Thanks!
    2
  276. Congrats to your book. Long time since I watched Deadline on DR, but with you on it, the now soft and somehow missing backbone moderators wouldn't stop me from watching :)
    2
  277. Thanks
    2
  278. Tak!
    2
  279. Thanks!
    2
  280. Thanks!
    2
  281. Thanks!
    2
  282. Thanks
    2
  283. Thanks!
    2
  284. Tak!
    2
  285. Tak!
    2
  286. Tak!
    2
  287. Thanks!
    2
  288. Thanks!
    2
  289. Thanks!
    2
  290. Thanks!
    2
  291. Thanks
    2
  292. Thank you.
    2
  293. I have a half written script for a video that the "alliance" between Russia and China is overrated. Now I'd just look like a copycat as you already mention a sizeable part of my arguments. 😆
    2
  294.  @anderspuck  at least I have the proof of having mentioned that at least ten times in my streams so far. :)
    2
  295. if the west decides... Thank you for that video.
    2
  296. Tak!
    2
  297. Thanks
    2
  298. Thank you.
    2
  299. Tak!
    2
  300. Thank you.
    2
  301. Thanks!
    2
  302. Thanks!
    2
  303. An offensively bad offensive. It’s like Putin’s throwing valuable resources in a wood chipper. He’s not going to get his politically useful win. He’s been smart to basically announce his candidacy yesterday w/out actually announcing.
    1
  304. Thank you
    1
  305. Thanks!
    1
  306. Thanks
    1
  307. Danke!
    1
  308. Very interesting persepctive.
    1
  309. Great update Anders. Thx a lot! Cheers from Aarhus.
    1
  310. Thank you for that important video.
    1
  311. Thank you
    1
  312. Thanks!
    1
  313.  @anderspuck I came here after Jake referenced you; I am so glad he did. Your facts and straight up discussion are wonderfully presented. I’m now subscribed and look forward to your next video release! Cheers from New Orleans… 🥃
    1
  314. Thanks!
    1
  315. Thanks
    1
  316. Dear Anders. After 4,5 hours straight of reading and commenting I made it throught the first round. We met outside DR-byen some months ago. You may remember. I'm happy to see the well-deserved fame you have. Other creators post three times a week without getting your noteriety. The happy smile is well earned. And as I said then, your cool military models and anti-hype analysis is much sought after. And rightly so. 'Ro på folkens. Far er hos jer.'
    1
  317. Thanks!
    1
  318. Thanks!
    1
  319. Thank you, Anders. Pro Putin trolls are aktiv again. Must be a good video, when they hate the content.
    1
  320. Thanks
    1
  321. Thanks!
    1
  322. [⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐] Thank you Sir Puck - Master of "Military Strategy .. You R wise beyond your years. I heistate to gush like a motar wound :cat-orange-whistling: but your unique "journalism & insights" would be a welcomed change to our western news outlets. I feel like I "get it". Yes, I'm sHoCkEd too. Thank you. Cheers from So.Ca.USA 3rd House On the Left (pls call before stopping by).
    1
  323. Danke!
    1
  324. Thanks!
    1
  325. Thanks!
    1
  326. Thanks!
    1
  327. Tak!
    1
  328. Dear Anders, thank you for the perfect explanation! Cheers! 🫡
    1
  329. Thank you for this take Anders!
    1
  330. Thanks!
    1
  331. Thanks!
    1
  332. Send by Vlad Vexler to check you out . Im happy i did 💙🤟
    1
  333. Thanks!
    1
  334. Thanks!
    1
  335. Thanks!
    1
  336. Thanks!
    1
  337. Thanks!
    1
  338. Thanks!
    1
  339. Tak!
    1
  340. Thanks!
    1
  341. Thanks!
    1
  342. Thank you for your continued reporting on Ukraine. Wouldn't an offensive from the north be less likely due to the special incursion operation in Belgorod Oblast?
    1
  343. Thanks!
    1
  344. Thanks!
    1
  345. Thanks!
    1
  346. Great, as usually. Lapland is probably even better than the well-known Narwa szenario, you're right.
    1
  347. Thanks!
    1
  348. Thanks!
    1
  349. The russians have already begun the genocide in Ukraine. The abduction of children as you mention, burning ukranian books and not accepting children speaking ukranian in schools in the occupied territories, denying the existence of a legal ukranian state. Also forcing ukranians to get russian passports in the occupied parts of Ukraine.., the list is much longer, and it's all aimed at making them russians again.
    1
  350. Thanks!
    1
  351. Thanks!
    1
  352. Merci!
    1
  353. Thanks!
    1
  354. God bedring!
    1
  355. Thanks!
    1
  356. Thanks!
    1
  357. Thank you for your insight.
    1
  358. I called that "managing defeat" when Sullivan first said "wherever the lines are drawn in the end". It also reminds me about the weird withdrawal of Russian troops from Kherson, when the Ukrainians didn't even seem to shell the crossing points. What a tragedy for Ukraine
    1
  359. Thanks!
    1
  360. Thx a lot for your insights!
    1
  361. Thanks!
    1
  362. Thanks!
    1
  363. Tak!
    1
  364. Hi, as someone whose job it is to write angry comments on the internet, I wanted tot his this is a pretty good video.
    1
  365. Thanks!
    1
  366. Thanks!
    1
  367. Grazie.
    1
  368. As always, an excellent video.
    1
  369. Bedankt
    1
  370. Thanks!
    1
  371. Thanks!
    1
  372. Plus it allows them to threaten to retake it, which Russia cannot let happen, effectively creating yet another front that Russia has to defend. If they had given up Bahkmut, Russia would have taken the surrounding areas (Chasiv-Yar and beyond), making it impossible to retake.
    1
  373. Tak!
    1
  374. Det ser ud som om du er ude på nordøst Amager idag. 😊
    1
  375. Thanks!
    1
  376. Danke!
    1
  377. Thanks!
    1
  378. Thanks!
    1
  379. Thanks
    1
  380. Anders anden Fed og hør og se at danske officer har føling på det som sker i verden
    1
  381. Thanks
    1
  382. Another brilliant video from you. And see, no dangerous south German background and no demonitarization. ;-) Regards from a south German
    1
  383. Anders, does the West have anything to counter the continuous use of Glide Bombs?
    1
  384. Thanks!
    1
  385. Thanks, Anders, for getting these things out in the public domain. It helps understand why Europe needs to step up military wise, and why we need to commit to international missions - e.g. by sending a frigate to the Red Sea.
    1
  386. Thanks!
    1
  387. Thanks!
    1
  388. Thank you for your excellent work. 🫡
    1
  389. Tak!
    1
  390. Which Putin? There are at least half a dozen of 'Putins' 😅
    1
  391. Thanks
    1
  392. Tak!
    1
  393. Thanks!
    1
  394. As always excellent input and food for thought!
    1
  395. Danke!
    1
  396. Thanks!
    1
  397. Thanks!
    1
  398. Thanks!
    1
  399. Thanks!
    1
  400. Thanks!
    1
  401. Tak!
    1
  402. Thanks!
    1
  403. Congrats on a successful elephant hunt. :)
    1
  404. Thanks!
    1
  405. Tak!
    1
  406. Takk!
    1
  407. Thanks!
    1
  408. Thanks!
    1
  409. Thanks
    1
  410. Danke!
    1
  411. Thanks! Putin must be singing the old Rolling Stones song: "Time is on my side..." WK
    1